Parenting Programs for Underserved Populations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues of Scientific Integrity and Social Justice
- 209 Downloads
Research suggests that parenting programs are effective for preventing behavioral and emotional difficulties in children, but a lot more attention needs to be paid to issues of context and culture during the development, testing, and implementation of these interventions. The views and needs of underserved and disenfranchised communities in the USA and the Global South are often not taken into account for the development and testing of interventions. The successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for vulnerable children and families in underserved and marginalized communities requires careful consideration of how existing paradigms of prevention, evaluation, and implementation science impact issues of social justice and equity. This paper will describe how a team of parenting program researchers has been collaborating with their partners globally in generating local knowledge by balancing the need for rigorous scientific methods with issues of power. Authors from the USA, Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia draw on their experiences regarding challenges and successes with issues regarding study design and measurement, the transferability and adaptation of interventions, and the dissemination and implementation of different parenting interventions while placing communities at the center of their efforts through participatory methods. We describe innovative approaches that span the continuum of intervention development, adaptation, optimization, evaluation, implementation, and scale-up of different parenting programs for vulnerable children and families across the world. We conclude by offering specific and pragmatic recommendations to increase access of culturally relevant and effective parenting programs in these communities.
KeywordsGlobal mental health Parenting Scale up Scale out Implementation
This study was funded by 3U01HL133994-02S1, 1U24HL136790-01, 1R01HG009351-01A1, 3 UL1 RR024992-09, K01-MH066297, K01 DA036747;South African National Lottery , UNICEF Philippines, UNICEF Tanzania, and UBS Optimus Fund  .
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baumann, A., Domenech Rodríguez, M., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2011). Community-based applied research with Latino immigrant families: informing practice and research according to ethical and social justice principles. Family Process, 50, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01351.x.Google Scholar
- Baumann, A. A., Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Amador, N. G., Forgatch, M. S., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2014). Parent Management Training-Oregon Model (PMTOTM) in Mexico City: integrating cultural adaptation activities in an implementation model. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12059.Google Scholar
- Baumann, A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. E., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: a systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025.Google Scholar
- Baumann, A., Cabassa, L. J., & Wiltsey Stirman, S. (2017). Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 285–300). London, UK: Oxford Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.
- Bayetti, C., & Jain, S. (2017). Problematising global mental health. In B. M. Z. Cohen (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of critical mental health. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Walsh, L., Lucas, S., Downey, M. M., Jackson, K., Fernandez, T., & Mandell, D. S. (2015). Free, brief, and validated: standardized instruments for low-resource mental health settings. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.02.002.Google Scholar
- Bernal, G., Bonilla, J., & Bellido, C. (1995). Ecological validity and cultural sensitivity for outcome research: issues for the cultural adaptation and development of psychosocial treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447045.Google Scholar
- Bhattacharyya, O., Wu, D., Mossman, K., Hayden, L., Gill, P., Cheng, Y.-L., et al. (2017). Criteria to assess potential reverse innovations: opportunities for shared learning between high- and low-income countries. Globalization and Health, 13(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0225-1.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H., Chamberlain, P., Saldaña, L., Padgett, C., Wang, W., & Cruden, G. (2014). Evaluation of two implementation strategies in 51 child county public service systems in two states: results of a cluster randomized head-to-head implementation trial. Implementation Science, 9(134), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0134-8.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., et al. (2017). An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215.Google Scholar
- Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2017). Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed.). London: Oxford Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.Google Scholar
- Cabassa, L. J., & Baumann, A. A. (2013). A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science, 8(90). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-90.
- Chambon, J. L., David, A., & Devevey, J. M. (1982). Les Innovations Sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
- Collins, L. M. (2014). Optimizing family intervention programs: the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). In S. M. McHale, P. R. Amato, & A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 231–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Collins, L. M. (2018). Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.Google Scholar
- Dixon, L., Salinas, M., & Marques, L. (2016). Advances and challenges in conducting research with diverse and vulnerable populations in a healthcare setting: reducing stigma and increasing cultural sensitivity. In R. Parekh & E. W. Childs (Eds.), Stigma and prejudice: touchstones in understanding diversity and healthcare (pp. 303–324). Switzerland: Humana Press.Google Scholar
- Fernando, S. (2011). A ‘global’ mental health program or markets for Big Pharma? OpenMind. Retrieved from: http://www.sumanfernando.com/Global%20Program%20&%20Big%20Pharma.pdf.
- Gardner, F., Leijten, P., Mann, J., Landau, S., Harris, V., Beecham, J., Bonin, E. M., Hutchings, J., & Scott, S. (2017). Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective. Public Health Research, 5(10), 1–144. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr05100.Google Scholar
- Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419.Google Scholar
- Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(11), 858–866.Google Scholar
- Landsverk, J., Brown, C. H., Smith, J. D., Chamberlain, P., Curran, G. M., Palinkas, L., et al. (2017). Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (pp. 201–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leijten, P., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Gardner, F., van Aar, J., Schulz, S., & Overbeek, G. (2018a, online first). Are relationship enhancement and behavior management “the golden couple” for disruptive child behavior? Two meta-analyses. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13051.
- Leijten, P., Raaijmakers, M., Wijngaards, L., Matthys, W., Menting, A., Hemink-van Putten, M., & Orobio de Castro, B. (2018b). Understanding who benefits from parenting interventions for children’s conduct problems: an integrative data analysis. Prevention Science, 19(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0864-y.Google Scholar
- Lyon, A. R., Lau, A. S., McCauley, E., Vander Stoep, A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2014). A case for modular design: implications for implementing evidence-based interventions with culturally diverse youth. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035301.Google Scholar
- Mazzucca, S., Tabak, R. G., Pilar, M., Ramsey, A. T., Baumann, A. A., Kryzer, E., Lewis, E. M., Padek, M., Powell, B. J., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Variation in research designs used to test the effectiveness of dissemination and implementation strategies: a review. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(32). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00032.
- Mejia, A., Calam, R., & Sanders, M. R. (2015b). Examining delivery preferences and cultural relevance of an evidence-based parenting program in a low-resource setting of Central America: approaching parents as consumers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9911-x.Google Scholar
- Mills, C., & White, R. G. (2017). Global mental health spreads like bush fire in the global south’: Efforts to scale up mental health services in low- and middle-income countries. In R. G. White, S. Jain, D. M. R. Orr, & U. M. Read (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sociocultural perspectives on global mental health (pp. 187–209). London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
- Parra-Cardona, R., Leijten, P., Lachman, J. M., Mejía, A., Baumann, A. A., Buenabad, N. G. A., & Ward, C. L. (2018). Strengthening a culture of prevention in low-and middle-income countries: balancing scientific expectations and contextual realities. Prevention Science, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.Google Scholar
- Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2017). Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In R. Brownson, G. Colditz, & E. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 19–45). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Roberts, M. C., Blossom, J. B., Evans, S. C., Amaro, C. M., & Kanine, R. M. (2017). Advancing the scientific foundation for evidence-based practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(6), 915–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1152554.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2016). Defining “evidence based”. Retrieved from: https://www.samhsa.gov/capt/applying-strategic-prevention-framework/step3-plan/defining-evidence-based
- Trimble, C., & Govindarajan, V. (2012). Reverse innovation: create far from home, win everywhere. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
- van Aar, J., Leijten, P., de Castro, B. O., & Overbeek, G. (2017). Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.11.006.Google Scholar
- Weiss, B., Ngo, V. K., Dang, H. M., Pollack, A., Trung, L. T., Tran, C. V., et al. (2012). A model for sustainable development of child mental health infrastructure in the lmic world: Vietnam as a case example. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027316.Google Scholar
- Weisz, J. R., & Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization, & ExpandNet. (2011). Beginning with the end in mind: Planning pilot projects and other programmatic research for successful scaling up. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/strategic_approach/9789241502320/en/
- Yancey, A., Ortega, A., & Kumanyika, S. (2006). Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113. Google Scholar
- Yancey, A. T., Glenn, B. A., Ford, C. L., & Bell-Lewis, L. (2017). Dissemination and implementation research among racial/ethnic minority and other vulnerable populations. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 449–470). London: Oxford Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.Google Scholar