The Men’s Story Project: Promoting Healthy Masculinities via Men’s Public, Personal Narrative-Sharing
The Men’s Story Project (MSP) is a scalable social and behavior change communication initiative that fosters critical reflection and dialogue about masculinities by creating public forums where men share non-fiction, personal narratives that challenge male norms and model healthy, gender-equitable masculinities. Via focus groups and in-depth interviews, this qualitative evaluation study examined impacts of the MSP for 20 MSP presenters and 31 college audience members who attended an MSP production at a public university in California in the Spring 2009 semester. Key thematic findings for MSP presenters included value placed on the men’s group experience; having their stereotypes and prejudices challenged; empowerment and healing; reinforced commitment to cease/prevent men’s violence; and expanded gender justice engagement. For audience members, key thematic findings included gaining an expanded conceptualization of masculinity; learning about intersectionality; having their stereotypes and prejudices challenged; and finding significant overall educational and social value in the MSP. The MSP’s effects on audience members were facilitated by experiences of emotion, empathy, parafriendship and role modeling elicited by the first-person narratives, and the social learning environment fostered by the collective, public experience. Directions for further international research and practice are discussed.
KeywordsMasculinity Masculinities Narratives Testimonials Gender-based violence Intersectionality Role models
This research was supported by Award Number T32MH019105 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest Statements
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures involved in this study, which involved human participants, were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Casey, Erin, and Tyler Smith. (2010). “How can I not?’ Men’s pathways to involvement in anti-violence against women work. Violence Against Women 16:953-973.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, S. L. (2015). Men at risk: masculinity, heterosexuality and HIV prevention. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, S. L., Hatcher, A. M., Colvin, C., & Peacock, D. (2013). Impact of a gender-transformative HIV and antiviolence program on gender ideologies and masculinities in two rural, South African communities. Men and Masculinities, 16(2), 181–202.Google Scholar
- Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Greig A, Abdur-Rahman A, Seyoum Alemu B. (2015). Working with men and boys to end violence against women and girls: approaches, challenges, and lessons. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
- Kimmel, M. S. (Ed.). (1987). Changing men: new directions in research on men and masculinity. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Lehrer, J. (2009, 2017). The Men’s Story Project: tips and guidelines for creating local productions. Washington, DC: Men’s Story ProjectGoogle Scholar
- Lofland, J., & Lofland, J. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth: Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
- Messner, M. A., Greenberg, M. A., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Noar, S. M., & Morokoff, P. J. (2002). The relationship between masculinity ideology, condom attitudes, and condom use stage of change: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Men’s Health, 1(1), 43–58.Google Scholar
- Sabo, D. (2005). The study of masculinities and men’s health. In Kimmel M. S., Hearn J, Connell R.W. (Eds.), Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities (pp 326–352). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Singhal, A., Sharma, D., Papa, M. J., & Witte, K. (2004). Air cover and ground mobilization: integrating entertainment-education broadcasts with community listening and service delivery in India. In A. Singhal et al. (Eds.), Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice (pp. 351–376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Sociocultural Research Consultants, LLC. (2016). Dedoose Version 7.0.23. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed-method research data. Los Angeles, CA. www.dedoose.com.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar