Global Social Welfare

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 125–136 | Cite as

Indigenous Adaptation Practices for the Development of Climate Resilient Ecosystems in the Hail Haor, Bangladesh

  • Md. Mostafa Monwar
  • Md. Golam Mustafa
  • Niaz Ahmed Khan
  • M. Shahadat Hossain
  • Mohammad Mosarof Hossain
  • Monoj Kumar Majumder
  • Ruhul Mohaiman Chowdhury
  • Mohammad Amirul Islam
  • Moniruzzaman Chowdhury
  • Mohammed Shahidul Alam
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Human communities inhabiting remote and geomorphically fragile flood plain areas are particularly vulnerable to climate change-related hazards and hydrometeorological extremes. This study presents the community livelihood structure, perception of climate change, and indigenous coping strategies adopted by the local communities in the flood plain areas especially at the Hail haor. Field observations reveal that there have been several recent phenomena that are identified and reported on the manifestations of climate change by the respondent community members. These phenomena includes the following: loss of income (90 %), reduced fish availability (80 %), reduced fish diversity (70 %), reduced migratory bird’s availability (70 %), decreased crop production (70 %), food crisis (70 %), reduced aquatic plants availability (60 %), sudden flood (60 %), increased storm (60 %), decreased water-retaining capacity of beels and haor (60 %), increased drought (50 %), temperature rise (50 %), drying of water supply canal (50 %), scattered rainfall patterns (40 %), increased fish diseases during winter season (40 %), increased human viral diseases (20 %), and introduction of unknown paddy diseases (red coloration of plant, 20 %). The indigenous adaptation and coping strategies were identified. The correlations between coping strategies and physical, human, financial, natural, and social assets were significant. From the present field observation, it is evident that livestock rearing, homestead vegetable gardening, increased fishing time, and change in livelihood options found as most effective options to cope with the adverse effect of climate change. By identifying localized climate change disasters with intensity of impacts and analyzing indigenous coping mechanisms, this study attempts to address the community-based adaptation practices in climate change challenges.

Keywords

Climate change Climate resilient ecosystems Community livelihood Indigenous adaptation practices Hail haor 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was carried out through the applied research fellowship program of the Integrated Protected Area Co-management (IPAC) Project and WorldFish Centre, Bangladesh with funding by the US Agency for International Development. I would like to acknowledge the IPAC –WorldFish Centre for providing me this research opportunity.

References

  1. AAI. (2005). Participatory vulnerability analysis: a step-by-step guide for field staff. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Action Aid International (AAI).Google Scholar
  2. Abramovitz, J. (2001). Unnatural disasters. Worldwatch Paper, 158. Washington, DC: World Watch Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed, N., Troell, M., Allison, E. H., & Muri, J. F. (2008). Prawn post larvae fishing in coastal Bangladesh: challenges for sustainable livelihoods. Marine Policy, 34, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali, M. Y. (1997). Fish, water and people. Dhaka: University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ali, A. (2005). Livelihood and food security in rural Bangladesh: the role of social capital. PhD Dissertation, Germany: Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Allison, E. H., & Ellis, F. (2001). The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 25, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey, C., & Pomeroy, C. (1996). Resource dependency and development options in coastal Southeast Asia. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BBS. (1999). Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).Google Scholar
  10. BirdLife International. (2004). Important bird areas in Asia: key sites for conservation. Cambridge: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
  11. Byg, A., & Salick, J. (2009). Local perspectives on a global phenomenon—climate change in Eastern Tibetan villages. Global Environmental Change, 19, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carney, D. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. London, UK: Department for International Development (DFID).Google Scholar
  13. Chakraborty, T. R., Adrika, A. & Hussain, M. B. (2005). Fish and wildlife of Chanda Beel Area. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Bangladesh Country Office.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, R. (1992). Rapid and participatory rural appraisal. Africanus, 22, 6–15.Google Scholar
  15. Das, N. G., & Hossain, M. S. (2005). Livelihood and resource assessment for aquaculture development in waterlogged paddy lands: remote sensing, GIS and participatory approach. Chittagong: Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, University of Chittagong.Google Scholar
  16. Dev, B. K. (2011). Co-management participation, livelihood, and status among fisheries in Baikka Beel, Bangladesh. In J. Fox, M. G. Mustafa, S. A. Quazi, W. B. Miles, E. J. Cunningham, & M. Chassels (Eds.), Rural livelihoods and protected landscapes: co-management in the wetlands and forests of Bangladesh (pp. 66–84). Dhaka: Integrated Protected Area Co-management Project-USAID.Google Scholar
  17. DFID. (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London, UK: Department for International Development (DFID).Google Scholar
  18. DoF. (2011). An overview of fisheries resources of Bangladesh (In Bangla). Bangladesh: Department of Fisheries (DoF), Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Government of BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  19. DoF. (2012). National Fish Week 2012 Compendium (In Bangla). Bangladesh: Department of Fisheries (DoF), Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Government of BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebdon, D. (1985). Statistics in geography (2nd ed.). Kundli: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. FAO. (2009). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: 2008. Rome, Italy: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department.Google Scholar
  22. FAP. (1995). Potential impacts of flood control on the biological diversity and nutritional value of subsistence fisheries in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Flood Action Plan (FAP) 16 Environmental Study, (Report prepared by Irrigation Support Project for Asia and the Near East), Flood Plan Coordination Organization, Ministry of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferdousi, U. K. (2013). Sustainable rural livelihoods and co-management intervention: the case of Mokosh Beel, Gazipur, Bangladesh. In J. Fox, M. G. Mustafa, B. R. Bushley, S. M. Brennan, & L. Durand (Eds.), Connecting communities and conservation: co-management initiatives implemented by IPAC in wetlands and forests of Bangladesh (pp. 115–130). Dhaka: Integrated Protected Area Co-management Project-USAID.Google Scholar
  24. Fine, B. (1999). The development state is dead: long live social capital. Development and Change, 30, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaillard, J. C., Maceda, E. A., Stasiak, E., Berre, I. L., Victoria, I. L., & Espaldon, O. M. (2009). Sustainable livelihoods and people’s vulnerability in the face of coastal hazards. Journal of Coast. Conservation, 13, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gittleson, J., & Mookherji, S. (1997). The application of anthropological methods to study the intra household resource allocation. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intra household resource allocation in development countries: models, methods, and policy. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University press.Google Scholar
  27. Hossain, M. S. (2009). Coastal community resilience assessment: using analytical hierarchy process. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Participatory Research and Development Initiative (PRDI)Google Scholar
  28. Hossain, M. S. (2012). Fishermen resilience modeling of Hatia. Chittagong: University of Chittagong.Google Scholar
  29. Hossain, M. S., Khan, Y. S. A., Chowdhury, S. R., Saifullah, S. M., Kashem, M. B., & Jabbar, S. M. A. (2004). Environment and socio-economic aspects: a community based approach from Chittagong Coast, Bangladesh. Jahangirnagar University Journal of Science, 27, 155–176.Google Scholar
  30. Hossain, M. A., Haque, M. E., & Ullah, A. M. (2010). Food security and income generation through access to common property water bodies in monga-affected areas of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Final Report, National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Program.Google Scholar
  31. Hossain, M. S., Rahman, M. F., Thompson, S., Nabi, M. R., & Kibria, M. M. (2013). Climate change resilience assessment using livelihood assets of coastal fishing community in Nijhum Dwip, Bangladesh. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 21, 397–422.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, R., Adnan, S., & Bdalal-Clayton, B. (1994). Floodplains or flood plans? London: International Institute for Environment and Development and Research and Advisory Services.Google Scholar
  33. IIRR. (1998). Participatory method in community based coastal resource management. 3 vols. Silang, Cavite, Philippines: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR).Google Scholar
  34. Islam, M. M. (2008). Living on the margin: the poverty fisheries nexus in Bangladesh. Norway: MSc Dissertation, Department of Social & Marketing Studies, Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  35. IUCN Bangladesh. (2000). Red book of threatened fishes of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  36. Kabeer, F. (2013). Impacts of co-management and related institutions on fish biodiversity and livelihoods of fishers of Baikka Beel. In J. Fox, M. G. Mustafa, B. R. Bushley, S. M. Brennan, & L. Durand (Eds.), Connecting communities and conservation: co-management initiatives implemented by ipac in wetlands and forests of Bangladesh (pp. 115–130). Dhaka: Integrated Protected Area Co-management Project-USAID.Google Scholar
  37. MACH. (2007). MACH (Management of Aquatic Resources through Community Husbandry) project completion report (Vol. 1). Dhaka: Winrock International.Google Scholar
  38. Majumder, T. M. K., Mazumder, S. K., Monwar, M. M., & Basak, L. R. (2013). Towards climate change resilient of Hail Haor, Sylhet: reviewing the role of the co-management approach. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 5, 59–66.Google Scholar
  39. Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A., & Williams, L. (2006). The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics, 11, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mettrick, H. (1993). Development oriented research in agriculture: An ICRA textbook, Wageningen, The Netherlands: International Centre for Development Oriented Research in Agriculture (ICRA)Google Scholar
  41. Mikkelsen, B. (1995). Methods for development work and research: a guide for practitioners. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Mitch. (1993). Wetlands. New York, USA: Van Nostrand ReindholdGoogle Scholar
  43. Monwar, M. M. (2013). Community livelihood and indigenous adaptation practices in the Hail haor, Moulavibazar, Bangladesh. In M. G. Mustafa, N. A. Khan, A. F. M. Akhtaruzzaman, A. K. Y. Haroon, & R. M. Chowdhury (Eds.), Co-managed and climate resilient ecosystems (pp. 420–436). Dhaka: Integrated Protected Area Co-management Project-USAID.Google Scholar
  44. Mozumder, P. (2005). Coping with a natural disaster: understanding household and social responses. New Mexico, USA: PhD Dissertation, The University of New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  45. Nkem, J. (2007). Methodological framework for vulnerability assessment of climate change impacts on forest-based development sectors, Center for International Forestry Research. Available at:http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/trofcca/attachment/03 TroFCCA Annual Report - Year 2 -web.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Pido, M. D. (1995). The application of Rapid Rural Appraisal Techniques in Coastal resources planning: experience in Malampaya Sound, Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management, 26, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pido, M. D., Pomeroy, R. S., Carlos, M. B., & Garces, L. R. (1996). A handbook for rapid appraisal of fisheries management systems (version 1). Manila, Philippines: ICLARM (The International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management).Google Scholar
  48. Rahman, A. K. A. (1989). Fresh water fish of Bangladesh. Bangladesh: Dhaka University.Google Scholar
  49. Sarker, S., & Hossain, M. S. (2012). Climate change disaster and community based mitigation options at Ramgati Coast, Bangladesh. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 2, 346–354.Google Scholar
  50. Schrimshaw, S. (1990). Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in the study of intra household resource allocation. In B. L. Rogers & N. P. Schlossman (Eds.), Intra household resource allocation: issues and methods for policy and planning. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Theis, J., & Grady, H. M. (1999). Participatory rapid appraisal for community development, a training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and Save the Children Federation.Google Scholar
  52. Townsley, P. (1996). Rapid rural appraisal, participatory rural appraisal and aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 358. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  53. Trap, N. (2006). Vulnerability of fishing communities in Vietnam: an exploration of the scope to adapt to environmental change. Amsterdam: Vrije University.Google Scholar
  54. UN. (2006). On better terms, a glance at key climate change and disaster risk reduction concepts. Consultation Version, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations (UN)Google Scholar
  55. UNDP. (2004). Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Mostafa Monwar
    • 1
  • Md. Golam Mustafa
    • 2
  • Niaz Ahmed Khan
    • 3
  • M. Shahadat Hossain
    • 1
  • Mohammad Mosarof Hossain
    • 4
  • Monoj Kumar Majumder
    • 5
  • Ruhul Mohaiman Chowdhury
    • 6
  • Mohammad Amirul Islam
    • 6
  • Moniruzzaman Chowdhury
    • 7
  • Mohammed Shahidul Alam
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Sciences and FisheriesUniversity of ChittagongChittagongBangladesh
  2. 2.The WorldFish CenterDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.Department of Development StudiesUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh
  4. 4.Department of Coastal and Marine FisheriesSylhet Agricultural UniversitySylhetBangladesh
  5. 5.Department of Agricultural EconomicsSher-e-Bangla Agricultural UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  6. 6.Integrated Protected Area Co-Management ProjectDhakaBangladesh
  7. 7.Integrated Protected Area Co-Management ProjectMoulavibazarBangladesh

Personalised recommendations