Frame-based terminology applied to military science: transforming a glossary into a knowledge resource
- 33 Downloads
This paper describes a Frame-Based Terminology approach to the military terminology of the Spanish Armed Forces. The alphabetically organized (PD0-000) glossary of military terms of the Spanish Armed Forces was transformed into MiliMarco [MiliFrame], a bilingual terminological knowledge base in which each concept appears within a hierarchy of conceptual categories and a semantic network. Frame-based resources enhance access to domain knowledge in a contextualized way, since embedding concepts in a knowledge structure activates associative information in semantic memory and promotes context availability. The design and population of MiliMarco involved the analysis and transformation of the content in the glossary entries as well as the extraction of new information. For this purpose, specialized knowledge structures were elaborated from the definitions in the glossary and from the lexicalization of semantic relations in the corpus. New concepts were added to fill the gaps in the glossary and additional data categories were included, such as images, collocations, and contexts. Previous work on military ontologies, usually in the form of controlled, structured vocabularies, is limited to a specific domain (e.g., military intelligence). MiliMarco has the advantage of providing an expanded view of the military domain in the form of conceptual networks combined with linguistic contexts that go far beyond simple hierarchies. Although still an ongoing project, the resulting knowledge base is currently a concept-oriented resource where users can browse through the conceptual hierarchy and semantic networks based on their cognitive and communicative needs.
KeywordsTerminology knowledge base Military science Frame-based terminology Corpus linguistics
This research was carried out as part of the projects FFI2017-89127-P, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; and PIN 5/18, funded by the CEMIX UGR-MADOC.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bowman, Michael, Antonio López Jr., and Gheorghe Tecuci. 2001. Ontology development for military applications. In Proceedings of the Southeastern Regional ACM Conference, Atlanta, GA, March 16–17.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, A. (ed.). 2011. Concise Oxford english dictionary, 12th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2007. Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Faber, Pamela (ed.). 2012. A cognitive linguistics view of terminology and specialized language. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Jones, Ian. 2011. The NATO terminology programme and NATOTerm. In Proceedings of the 33rd Translating and the Computer Conference, London. http://www.mt-archive.info/Aslib-2011-Jones.pdf.
- León-Araúz, Pilar, and Antonio San Martín. 2018. The EcoLexicon semantic sketch grammar: from knowledge patterns to word sketches. In Proceedings of the LREC 2018 workshop “Globalex 2018 – Lexicography and WordNets”, ed. I. Kerneman, and S. Krek, 94–99. Globalex: Miyazaki.Google Scholar
- León-Araúz, Pilar, Antonio San Martín, and Pamela Faber. 2016. Pattern-based word sketches for the extraction of semantic relations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Terminology (Computerm 2016), Osaka, Japan, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
- Marshman, Elizabeth. 2002. The cause-effect relation in a biopharmaceutical corpus: English knowledge patterns. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Nancy, France, pp 89–94.Google Scholar
- NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). 2011. Linguistic Support for Operations, ALING P-1. http://nso.nato.int/nso/zPublic/ap/alingp-1.pdf.
- Nguyen, Duc N., Joseph B. Kopena, Thau Loo Boon, and William C. Regli. 2010. Ontologies for distributed command and control messaging. In Proceedings of the 2010 conference on formal ontology in information systems: proceedings of the sixth international conference (FOIS 2010), ed. A. Galton and R. Mizoguchi, 373–384. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Rey, Alan (ed.). 2019. Le Petit Robert de la Langue Française. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
- Sager, Juan C., David Dungworth, and Peter F. McDonald. 1980. English Special Languages. Principles and Practice in Science and Technology. Wiesbaden, Germany: Oscar Brandstetter Verlag.Google Scholar
- Tolk, Andreas, and Barry Smith. 2011. Command and Control Ontology. International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems 4: 209.Google Scholar