Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 451–454 | Cite as

Preclinical Medical Student Attitudes Toward Use of Psychiatry Residents as Actors in a Suicide and Violence Risk Assessment Simulation Activity

  • Mary E. SteinmannEmail author
  • Gretchen A. Case
  • Sean Ferrell
Feature: Educational Case Report

It is important to prepare medical students for the transition to clinical work during their preclinical years and to transform classroom knowledge into clinical skills. Suicide and violence risk assessment is an essential clinical skill that is infrequently taught deliberately in medical education [1]. Experience working with real patients at risk of suicide or violence is critical to gain during clinical years and difficult to gain during preclinical years. When teaching broad psychiatry concepts, simulation offers the advantages of being logistically and economically convenient and more predictable and poses less risk of harm done to real patients [2]. Simulation training can be an effective modality to prepare students for analogous clinical scenarios [3]. Other studies describing simulation-based skills training in mental health care have shown some success in developing clinical skills in psychiatry, including managing agitated patients [4], assessing psychiatric illness [5],...

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Utah School of Medicine for ongoing support of this educational activity.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Considerations

The student and resident feedback used in this case report was obtained from standard end-of-course evaluations and unsolicited feedback, and was exempt from IRB approval.

References

  1. 1.
    Silverman B. Training for suicide risk assessment and suicide risk formulation. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:526–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brenner A. Uses and limitations of simulated patients in psychiatry education. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35:e844–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zigman. 2011Using simulation to train junior psychiatry residents to work with agitated patients: a pilot study. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ballon B, et al. Headspace theater: an innovative method for experiential learning of psychiatric symptomatology using modified role playing and improvisational theater techniques. Acad Psychiatry. 2007;31:380–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisenberg AR, Schulessel YR. Medicine as a performing art: what we can learn about empathic communication from theater arts. Acad Med. 2015;90:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larson ED, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293:1100–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skye E, et al. Use of interactive theater and role play to develop medical students skills in breaking bad news. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29:704–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations