Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 424–428 | Cite as

Career Development Institute with Enhanced Mentoring: A Revisit

  • David J. Kupfer
  • Alan F. Schatzberg
  • Leslie O. Dunn
  • Andrea K. Schneider
  • Tara L. Moore
  • Melissa DeRosier
Empirical Report



The need for innovative methods to promote training, advancement, and retention of clinical and translational investigators in order to build a pipeline of trainees to focus on mental health-relevant research careers is pressing. The specific aim of the Career Development Institute for Psychiatry is to provide the necessary skill set and support to a nationally selected broad-based group of young psychiatrists and PhD researchers to launch and maintain successful research careers in academic psychiatry. The program targets such career skills as writing, negotiating, time management, juggling multiple demanding responsibilities, networking, project management, responsible conduct of research, and career goal setting. The current program builds on the previous program by adding a longitudinal, long-distance, virtual mentoring, and training program, seen as integral components to sustaining these career skills.


Career development activities occur in four phases over a 24-month period for each annual class of up to 18 participants: online baseline career and skills self-assessment and goal setting, preparations for 4-day in-person workshop, long-distance structured mentoring and online continued learning, peer-mentoring activities, and post-program career progress and process evaluation. Program instructors and mentors consist of faculty from the University of Pittsburgh and Stanford University as well as successful past program graduates from other universities as peer mentors.

A comprehensive website facilitates long-distance activities to occur online. Continued training occurs via webinars every other month by experts discussing topics selected for the needs of each particular class. Personally assigned mentors meet individually bimonthly with participants via a secure web-based “mentor center” that allows mentor dyads to collaborate, share, review, and discuss career goals and research activities.


Preliminary results after the first 24 months are favorable. Almost uniformly, participants felt the program was very helpful. They had regular contact with their long-distance mentor at least every 2 months over the 2-year period. At the end of the 2-year period, the majority of participants had full-time faculty appointments with K-award support and very few were doing primarily clinical work.


The longitudinal program of education, training, mentoring, peer support, and communications for individuals making the transition to academic research should increase the number of scientists committed to research careers in mental health.


Career development Careers in psychiatry Academic careers 



The authors would like to thank Megan DeBertrand for her efforts in the success of the Career Development Institute


Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institutes of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R25MH09047. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.


  1. 1.
    Kupfer DJ, Schatzberg AF, Grochocinski VG, Dunn LO, Kelley KA, O’Hara RM. The Career Development Institute for Psychiatry: an innovative, longitudinal program for physician-scientists. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balon R, Singh S. Status of research training in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2001;25:34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). Training scientists to make the right moves: a practical guide to developing programs in scientific management. Research Triangle Park, NC and Chevy Chase, MD, 2006. Available
  4. 4.
    National Research Council. Addressing the nation’s changing needs for biomedical and behavioral scientists, committee on national needs for biomedical and behavioral scientists. Washington: National Academies Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yager J, Greden J, Abrams M, Riba M. The Institute of Medicine’s report on research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform—background, results, and follow up. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:267–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kupfer DJ, Hyman SE, Schatzberg AF, Pincus HA, Reynolds CF. Recruiting and retaining future generations of physician scientists in mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:657–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynolds CF, Pilkonis PA, Kupfer DJ, Dunn L, Pincus HA. Training future generations of mental health researchers: devised strategies for tough times. Acad Psychiatry. 2007;31:152–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nash JM. Transdisciplinary training. Key components and prerequisites for success. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2Supp):S133–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pololi L, Knight S. Mentoring faculty in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:866–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee A, Dennis C, Campbell P. Nature’s guide for mentors. Nature. 2007;447:791–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine. Syst Rev JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84:135–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, Lovett M, O’Sullivan P. Does mentoring matter: results from a large survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:5063. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nathan DG. Careers in clinical translational research—historical perspectives. Futur Chall JAMA. 2002;287:2424–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson AM. Charting a course for a successful research career: a guide for early career researchers. 2nd ed. The Netherlands: Elsevier, B.V; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeRosier ME, Kameny RR, Hehman CT. Web-based training and networking tool to promote broader dissemination of mental health research training and educational programs. Unpublished final report. Bethesda: National Institute for Mental Health; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Kupfer
    • 1
  • Alan F. Schatzberg
    • 2
  • Leslie O. Dunn
    • 1
  • Andrea K. Schneider
    • 3
  • Tara L. Moore
    • 1
  • Melissa DeRosier
    • 4
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Marquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.3-C Institute for Social DevelopmentCaryUSA

Personalised recommendations