Implementation of Online Suicide-Specific Training for VA Providers
- 450 Downloads
Due to the gap in suicide-specific intervention training for mental health students and professionals, e-learning is one solution to improving provider skills in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system. This study focused on the development and evaluation of an equivalent e-learning alternative to the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) in-person training approach at a Veteran Health Affairs medical center.
The study used a multicenter, randomized, cluster, and three group design. the development of e-CAMS was an iterative process and included pilot testing. Eligible and consenting mental health providers, who completed a CAMS pre-survey, were randomized. Provider satisfaction was assessed using the standard VA evaluation of training consisting of 20 items. Two post training focus groups, divided by learning conditions, were conducted to assess practice adoption using a protocol focused on experiences with training and delivery of CAMS.
A total of 215 providers in five sites were randomized to three conditions: 69 to e-learning, 70 to in-person, 76 to the control. The providers were primarily female, Caucasian, midlife providers. Based on frequency scores of satisfaction items, both learning groups rated the trainings positively. In focus groups representing divided by learning conditions, participants described positive reactions to CAMS training and similar individual and institutional barriers to full implementation of CAMS.
This is the first evaluation study of a suicide-specific e-learning training within the VA. The e-CAMS appears equivalent to the in-person CAMS in terms of provider satisfaction with training and practice adoption, consistent with other comparisons of training deliveries across specialty areas. Additional evaluation of provider confidence and adoption and patient outcomes is in progress. The e-CAMS has the potential to provide ongoing training for VA and military mental health providers and serve as a tutorial for psychiatrists in preparation for specialty boards.
KeywordsSuicide Intervention training Mental health students Mental health residents Veteran Health Affairs medical center
We want to acknowledge the actors and script authors: Keith Jennings, Catholic University of America; Delia Chariker, VA SATC Addictioin Therapist; David Koerner, VA Social Worker; Denise O'Neil, VA SATC Therapist; Jeff Walker, Veteran, Jonathan Coutas, Medical University of South Carolina Videographer, and Dan Gross, VA Psychologist.
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. Office of Research and Development. Health Services Research and Development. The study was approved by the joint University and VA IRB site and VA office of Research in the primary site and VA IRBs of the four satellite sites.
- 2.Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Services. Strategies for suicide prevention in veterans. Washington DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2009.Google Scholar
- 3.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. 2012 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action. Washington, DC: HHS, September 2012. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/national-strategy Accessed October 16, 2012. suicide-prevention/full-report.pdf.
- 4.Department of Veterans Affairs. VA issues new report on suicide data. Febuary 13, 2013. http://www.va.gov/opa/docs/Suicide-Data-Report-2012-final.pdf.
- 5.Knesper DJ, American Association of Suicidology, Suicide Prevention Resource Center. Continuity of care for suicide prevention and research: Suicide attempts and suicide deaths subsequent to discharge from the emergency department or psychiatry inpatient unit. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. 2010. http://www.sprc.org Accessed January 3, 2012.
- 6.National Action Alliance: Care and Critical Intervention Task Force. Suicide Care and Systems Framework. National Action Alliance; 2011. http://actionallianceforsuicideprevevention.org/ Accessed February 8, 2012.
- 7.Schmitz W, Allen M, Feldman B, et al. Preventing suicide through improved training in suicide risk assessment and care: an American Association of Suicidology Task Force Report addressing serious gaps in U.S. mental health training. Suicide Life Threat. 2012;42(3):292–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00090.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, et al. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Center for Technology in Learning, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education 2009. http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf Accessed May 30, 2012.
- 10.Jobes D. Managing suicidal risk: a collaborative approach. New York, NY: Guilford; 2006.Google Scholar
- 11.Magruder K, York J, Jobes D, et al. Patient and provider outcomes of e-learning training in CAMS. EDU 08-424. Health Services R&D, Department of Veterans Affairs. 8/1/09-9/30/13.Google Scholar
- 19.Jobes D, Comtois K, Brenner L, et al. Clinical trial feasibility studies of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS). In: O’Connor R, Platt S, Gordon J, editors. International handbook of suicide prevention: research, policy & practice. West Sussex, UK: Wiley–Blackwell; 2011. p. 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Shoenbaum M, Heissen R, Pearson J. Opportunities to improve interventions to reduce suicidality: civilian “best practices” for army consideration. Washington DC: Department Health Human Services, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health; 2009.Google Scholar
- 24.Joint Commission. Behavioral Health Care 2013 National Patient Safety Goals http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx Accessed June 15, 2013.
- 31.Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10(12). http://www.biomedcentral.com1472-6920/10/12.
- 35.Hrastinski S. A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educ Quart. 2008;4:51–5.Google Scholar
- 36.Magruder K, York J, Marshall E, et al. Can web-based training improve management of suicidal patients? Presentation. 141st American Public Health Annual Meeting, Boston MA, November, 2013.Google Scholar
- 38.Brouwers M, Makarski J, Durocher L, et al. E-learning interventions are comparable to user’s manual in a randomized trial of training strategies for the AGREE II. Imp Sci. 2011;681:3–10.Google Scholar
- 43.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar