Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 233–241

Television’s “Crazy Lady” Trope: Female Psychopathic Traits, Teaching, and Influence of Popular Culture

  • Cathleen Cerny
  • Susan Hatters Friedman
  • Delaney Smith
Column: Media

Abstract

Objective

This article describes notable illustrations of female psychopathy on modern television to review various characters that will have utility in teaching students about female psychopathy in distinction to male psychopathy and to encourage consideration of the potential effects that viewing these countless examples may have on a generation of young women.

Methods

The authors use examples from soap operas, crime procedurals, reality television, fantasy, comedies, and young adult programs to illustrate gender differences in psychopathy and make specific teaching points. They also review the research literature related to popular culture’s impact on behavior and gender roles.

Results

Gender differences in real-world psychopathy are mirrored in television portrayals. For example, female psychopaths, on TV and in reality, use sexual manipulation, demonstrate unstable emotions, and employ social aggression to achieve their ambitions. The examples of female psychopathic traits are prevalent on TV and easily accessible for teaching purposes. Research does give some support for a popular culture impact on behavior and gender roles.

Conclusions

As compared to male psychopathy, female psychopathy is less recognized, and there are some notable differences in how the psychopathic traits manifest. Television provides myriad teaching examples that can highlight the gender distinctions such as use of sexual manipulation, emotional instability, and social aggression. Research suggests that the prevalence of “crazy ladies” on television may be negatively impacting gender stereotypes and normalizing bad behavior in young women.

Keywords

Media Young adults Television Female psychopathy 

References

  1. 1.
    Harris T. The Silence of the Lambs. New York: St Martin’s Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Logan C. La femme fatale: the female psychopath in fiction and clinical practice. Ment Health Rev J. 2011;16:118–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LaSalle M. Complicated women: Sex and power in pre-code Hollywood. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Double Indemnity. Paramount Pictures, 1944Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snyder S. Personality disorder and the film noir femme fatale. J Crim Justice Pop Cult. 2001;8:155–68.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Manchurian Candidate. MGM, 1962.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Fantasy Films, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mommie Dearest. Paramount Pictures, 1981Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fatal Attraction. Paramount Pictures, 1987Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Misery. Castle Rock Entertainment, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basic Instinct. Carolco Pictures, 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malice. Castle Rock Entertainment, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Back to Basics: ESPN, The Magazine, November 29, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Criminal Minds. CBS, 2005–present.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    CSI (Crime Scene Investigation): Las Vegas. CBS, 2000–present.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pretty Little Liars. ABC Family, 2010–present.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gossip Girl. The CW, 2007–2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedman SH, Cerny CA, Soliman S, et al. Reel forensic experts: forensic psychiatrists as portrayed on screen. J Am Acad Psychiatry and the Law. 2011;39:412–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friedman SH, Cerny CA. From Hannibal Lecter to Alex Cross: forensic mental health experts in popular fiction. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:345–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition—Text Revision Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing Inc, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wynn R, Hoiseth MH, Pettersen G. Psychopathy in women: theoretical and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2012;4:257–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing Inc, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cleckley HM. The mask of sanity: an attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. Oxford: England, Mosby; 1941.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedman SH. Psychopathic personality. In: Loue S, Sajatovic M, editors. Encyclopedia of immigrant health. New York: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hare RD. Psychopathy: a clinical and forensic overview. Psych Clin N Amer. 2006;29:709–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dolan M, Vollm B. Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in women: a literature review on the reliability and validity of assessment instruments. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;3:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nicholls TL, Ogloff JRP, Brink J, et al. Psychopathy in women: a review of its clinical usefulness for assessing risk and aggression in criminality. Behav Sci Law. 2005;23:779–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soderstrom H. Psychopathy as a disorder of empathy. Eur Child Adol Psychiatr. 2003;12:249–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schulte-Ruther M, Markowitch H, Shah H, et al. Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. Neuroimag. 2008;42:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Honk J, Schutter D, Bos P, et al. Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3448–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Welborn B, Papademetris X, Reis D, et al. Variation in orbitofrontal cortex volume: relation to sex, emotion regulation and affect. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Adv Access. 2009;4:328–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raine A, Yang Y, Narr KL, et al. Sex differences in orbitofrontal gray as a partial explanation for sex differences in antisocial personality. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:227–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fritz G, Poe R. The role of a cinema seminar in psychiatric education. Am J Psychiatry. 1979;136:207–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hyler S, Moore J. Teaching psychiatry? Let Hollywood help: suicide in the cinema. Acad Psychiatry. 1996;20:212–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schlozman S. Vampires and those who slay them: using the television program Buffy the Vampire Slayer in adolescent therapy and psychodynamic education. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24:49–54.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wong R, Saber S, Ma I, et al: Using television shows to teach communication skills in internal medicine residency. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/9/9
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Berk R. Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. Int J Tech Teach Learn. 2009;5:1–21.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gross J, Levenson R. Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion. 1995;9:87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neilsen: Factsheet: The US media universe, 2011; http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2011/factsheet-the-u-s-media-universe.html Last accessed 11/26/13
  41. 41.
    Law and Order. NBC, 1990–2010.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Coyne SM, Archer J. Indirect aggression in the media: a content analysis of British television programs. Aggressive Behavior. 2004;30:254–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    All My Children. ABC, 1970–2011.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dynasty. Aaron Spelling Productions, 1981–1989.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    General Hospital. ABC, 1963–present.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Desperate Housewives. ABC, 2004–2012.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Revenge. ABC, 2011–present.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dexter. ShowTime, 2006–present.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Real Housewives of New Jersey. Bravo, 2009–present.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    The Apprentice. NBC, 2004–present.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Survivor. CBS, 2000–present.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    The Hills. MTV, 2006–2010.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    The Bachelor. ABC, 2002–present.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Game of Thrones. HBO, 2011–present.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Once Upon A Time. ABC, 2011–present.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stack T: The Witching Hour. Entertainment Weekly 2013 available at http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20690850,00.html. Last accessed 11/26/2013.
  57. 57.
    Vampire Diaries. CW, 2009–present.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    The Originals. CW, 2013–present.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    American Horror Story: Coven. FX, 2013.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Witches of East End. Lifetime, 2013.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Arrested Development. Imagine Entertainment, 2003–2013.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Glee. Fox, 2009–present.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jermyn D. Rereading the bitches from Hell: a feminist appropriation of the female psychopath. Screen. 1996;37:251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thompson CY. The psycho-femme: identity norm violations and the interactional dynamics of assignment. Deviant Behav. 1998;19:207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pozner JL. Reality bites back: the troubling truth about guilty pleasure TV. Berkley, CA: Seal Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Collins RL, Elliot MN, Berry SH, et al. Watching sex on television predicts adolescent initiation of sexual behavior. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e280–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    O’Hara RE, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, et al. Greater exposure to sexual content in popular movies predicts earlier sexual debut and increased sexual risk taking. Psychol Sci. 2012;23:984–93.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rivadeneyra R, Lebo M. The association between television-viewing behaviors and adolescent dating role attitudes and behaviors. J Adol. 2008;31:291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Phillips DP. The influence of suggestion on suicide: substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. Am Sociol Rev. 1974;39:340–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schmidtke A, Hafner H. The Werther effect after television films: new evidence for an old hypothesis. Psychol Med. 1988;18:665–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hawton K, Simkin S, Bulstrode C. Effects of a drug overdose in a television drama on presentations to hospital for self poisoning: Time series and questionnaire study. BMJ. 1999;318:1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Veysey M, Kamanyire R, Volans G. Effects of drug overdose in television drama on presentations for self poisoning. BMJ. 1999;319:972–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hall RCW, Friedman SH: Guns, schools, and mental illness: potential concerns for physicians and mental health professionals. Mayo Clin Proceed. 2013;88:1272–1283.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Krahe B, Busching R, Moller I. Media violence use and aggression among German adolescents: associations and trajectories of change in a three-wave longitude study. Psychol Popular Media Cult. 2012;1:152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Coyne SM, Archer J. Indirect aggression in the media: a content analysis of British television programs. Aggressive Behavior. 2004;30:254–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Coyne SM, Archer J. The relationship between indirect and physical aggression on television and in real life. Soc Dev. 2005;14:324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Coyne SM, Archer J, Eslea M. “We’re not friends anymore! Unless…:” The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational and social aggression. Aggressive Behavior. 2006;32:294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Coyne SM, Nelson DA, Graham-Kevan N, Tew E, Meng KN, Olsen JA. Media depictions of physical and relational aggression: connections with aggression in young adults’ romantic relationships. Aggressive Behavior. 2011;37(1):56–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Coyne SM, Robinson SL, Nelson DA. Does reality bite back? Physical, verbal and relational aggression in reality television programs. J Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2010;54:282–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathleen Cerny
    • 1
  • Susan Hatters Friedman
    • 1
  • Delaney Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations