Learning at Scale

  • Ido RollEmail author
  • Daniel M. Russell
  • Dragan Gašević
Introductory Article


Learning at Scale is a fast growing field that affects formal, informal, and workplace education. Highly interdisciplinary, it builds on solid foundations in the learning sciences, computer science, education, and the social sciences. We define learning at scale as the study of the technologies, pedagogies, analyses, and theories of learning and teaching that take place with a large number of learners and a high ratio of learners to facilitators. The scale of these environments often changes the very nature of the interaction and learning experiences. We identify three types of technologies that support scale in education: dedicated content-agnostic platforms, such as MOOCs; dedicated tools, such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems; and repurposed platforms, such as social networks. We further identify five areas that scale affects: learners, research and data, adaptation, space and time, and pedagogy. Introducing the papers in this special issue on the topic, we discuss the characteristics, affordances, and promise of learning at scale.


Learning at scale MOOCs Learning analytics Intelligent tutoring systems 


  1. Aleven, V., Sewall, J., Popes cu, O., van Velsen, M., Demi, S., & Leber, B. (2015). Reflecting on twelve years of ITS authoring tools research with CTAT. Design recommendations for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems, 3, 263–283.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chuang, I., & Ho, A. D. (2016). HarvardX and MITx: Four years of open online courses--fall 2012-summer 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J., Beenen, M., et al. (2010). Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature, 466(7307), 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2015). The Arizona state global freshman academy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(6), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Escobar-Rodrguez, T., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2014). Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool: An extension of the UTAUT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2).Google Scholar
  9. Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: Lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1).
  10. Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E., Brauneis, A., Diaz, M., Saltarelli, A., Blikstein, P., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2017). Design Guidelines and Empirical Case Study for Scaling Authentic Inquiry-based Science Learning via Open Online Courses and Interactive Biology Cloud Labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  13. Hurt, N. E., Moss, G. S., Bradley, C. L., Larson, L. R., & Lovelace, M. (2012). The -Facebook Effect- College Students Perceptions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2).
  14. Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., et al. (2017). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kizilcec, R. F. R. F., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(17), 4348–4353. Scholar
  16. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. na.Google Scholar
  17. Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A., & Gasevic, D. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of learning analytics. SOLAR, Society for Learning Analytics and Research.Google Scholar
  18. Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC (2012). The New York Times. Retrieved on Feb 15, 2018 from:
  19. Rapp, C., & Kauf, P. (2018). Scaling Academic Writing Instruction: Evaluation of a Scaffolding Tool (Thesis Writer). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  20. Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. L. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. Scholar
  22. Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., et al. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 1–28.Google Scholar
  23. Schuwer, R., & Kusters, R. (2014). Mass customization of education by an institution of HE: What can we learn from industry? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2).Google Scholar
  24. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1, 1–8 Scholar
  26. Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., & Brawner, K. (2015). Design recommendations for intelligent tutoring systems: Authoring tools and expert modeling techniques. In Robert Sottilare.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, C. (2011). How khan academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, 126, 1–5.Google Scholar
  28. Uchidiuno, J., Koedinger, K., Hammer, J., Yarzebinski, E., & Ogan, A. (2017a). How Do English Language Learners Interact with Different Content Types in MOOC Videos? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  29. Uchidiuno, J. O., Ogan, A., Yarzebinski, E., & Hammer, J. (2017b). Going Global: Understanding English Language Learners’ Student Motivation in English-Language MOOCs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  30. Vie, J.-J., Popineau, F., Bruillard, É., & Bourda, Y. (2018). Automated Test Assembly for Handling Learner Cold-Start in Large-Scale Assessments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
  31. von Ahn, L. (2013, March). Duolingo: learn a language for free while helping to translate the web. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 1–2). ACM.Google Scholar
  32. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yeomans, M., Stewart, B. M., Mavon, K., Kindel, A., Tingley, D., & Reich, J. (2017). The Civic Mission of MOOCs: Engagement across Political Differences in Online Forums. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Copyright information

© International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Google Inc.Menlo ParkUSA
  3. 3.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations