Going Global: Understanding English Language Learners’ Student Motivation in English-Language MOOCs

  • Judith Odili UchidiunoEmail author
  • Amy Ogan
  • Evelyn Yarzebinski
  • Jessica Hammer


Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) offer high quality, free courses to anyone with an Internet connection. However, these courses may be relatively inaccessible to the large global population of students who are English Language Learners (ELLs). Current efforts to understand student motivation in MOOCs do not take into account the specific needs of ELL students. Through interviews with 12 ELL online students, and a survey with 20,084 ELL respondents, we investigate ELL students’ motivations for taking online courses. We show that ELL students’ motivations are highly socialized strategies for achieving long-term goals of economic, social, and geographic mobility. Although research studies show that ELLs interact sparingly with other students in MOOCs, we present evidence that they have unmet needs for interaction, and discuss how student interaction systems in MOOCs can better address these needs. Finally, we show evidence that ELLs deliberately use English MOOCs to improve their language skills, even when the content is not language-related. This implies that meeting ELL students’ needs and access to MOOCs involves translating MOOCs to their local languages, but also providing language support in English-language MOOCs.


MOOCs Collaborative learning platforms English language learners Learning motivations Designing for multiple stakeholders 


  1. Aborisade, P. A. (2013). Investigating African “digital-immigrant”students’ reactions to Moodle resources. Higher Education of Social Science, 4(3), 68–77.Google Scholar
  2. Al Lily, A. E., Borovoi, L., & Vlaev, I. (2016). Social informatics in education societal cultures versus educational technologies. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society.
  3. Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Natural learning in higher education. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2426–2433). Chicago: Springer US.Google Scholar
  4. Boga, S., & McGreal, R. (2014). Introducing MOOCs to Africa: New economy skills for Africa Program Retrieved from
  5. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Google Scholar
  7. Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, L., & Oller Jr., J. (2005). Indexical relations and sound motion pictures in L2 curricula: The dynamic role of the teacher. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(2), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, G., & Alcorn, B. (2014, March). The Revolution Is Not Being MOOC-ized. Slate. Accessed 14 Oct 2015.
  10. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Available at SSRN 2350964. Retrieved from
  11. Collins, E. D. (2013). SJSU plus augmented online learning environment pilot project report. The Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges.Google Scholar
  12. Conversational English Skills. (2016, February 25). Retrieved from Accessed 22 May 2016.
  13. Coursera. (2013). A new partnership to bring Coursera to the hundreds of millions of Chinese learners across the world. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Oct 2015.
  14. Cutrell, E., Bala, S., Bansal, C., Cross, A., Datha, N., John, A., et al. (2013). Massively empowered classroom: Enhancing technical education in India. Micrsoft Research India.Google Scholar
  15. Czerniewicz, L., & Naidoo, U. (2013). MOOC-less in Africa Retrieved from Accessed 14 Oct 2015.
  16. Dillahunt, T. R., Ng, S., Fiesta, M., & Wang, Z. (2016). Do Massive Open Online Course Platforms Support Employability? In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 233–244). ACM. Retrieved from
  17. Dolan, K. (2013). Carlos Slim’s Foundation Puts Its Weight Behind Khan Academy. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Oct 2015.
  18. Etienne, C., & Vanbaelen, S. (2006). Paving the way to literary analysis through TV commercials. Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finkelstein, S., Yarzebinski, E., Vaughn, C., Ogan, A., & Cassell, J. (2013). The effects of culturally congruent educational technologies on student achievement. In Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 493–502). Springer. Retrieved from
  20. Geographic mobility. (2016, February 8). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from
  21. Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014a). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. L@S 2014, March 4–5, 2014. Retrieved from
  22. Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014b). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference - L@S ‘14, 21–30.
  23. Hammarström, H. (2015). Ethnologue 16/17/18th editions: A comprehensive review. Language, 91(3), 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 150–166.Google Scholar
  25. Kasunic, A., Hammer, J., Kraut, R., Massimi, M., & Ogan, A. (2016). A preliminary look at MOOC-associated Facebook groups: Prevalence, geographic representation, and Homophily. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 205–208). ACM. Retrieved from
  26. Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotturi, Y., Kulkarni, C. E., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. (2015). Structure and messaging techniques for online peer learning systems that increase stickiness. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 31–38). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Kuksenok, K., Brooks, M., Wang, Q., & Lee, C. P. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for technology in foreign language classrooms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘13 (p. 1011). New York: ACM.
  29. Kulkarni, C., Cambre, J., Kotturi, Y., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. (2016). Talkabout: Making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In Design Thinking Research (pp. 67–92). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Williams, S., & Adams, A. A. (2014). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers, 38-46.Google Scholar
  31. Machine Learning - Stanford University. (2015). Retrieved from Accessed 6 Aug 2016.
  32. McGuire, J. (2011). The Benefits of Having a College Education are Numerous. Retrieved from Accessed 29 Oct 2015.
  33. Noack, Rick, and Lazaro Gamio. "The world’s languages, in 7 maps and charts." The Washington Post 4.23 (2015): 65-70.Google Scholar
  34. Nyoni, J. (2013). The viral nature of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in open and distance learning: Discourses of quality, mediation and control. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 665.Google Scholar
  35. Oura, H., Anzai, Y., Fushikida, W., & Yamauchi, Y. (2015). What would experts say about this? An analysis of student interactions outside MOOC platform. Retrieved from
  36. Reilly, E. D., Wiliams, K. M., Stafford, R. E., Corliss, S. B., Walkow, J. C., & Kidwell, D. K. (2016). Global times call for global measures: Investigating automated essay scoring in linguistically-diverse MOOCs. Online Learning, 20(2), 217-229.Google Scholar
  37. Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2008, April). Predicting user interface preferences of culturally ambiguous users. In CHI'08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 3261-3266). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, D. M., Klemmer, S., Fox, A., Latulipe, C., Duneier, M., & Losh, E. (2013). Will massive online open courses (moocs) change education? CHI ‘13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA ‘13, 2395.
  39. Schmid, L., Manturuk, K., Simpkins, I., Goldwasser, M., & Whitfield, K. E. (2015). Fulfilling the promise: Do MOOCs reach the educationally underserved? Educational Media International, 52(2), 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2014). Why did you enroll in this course?: developing a standardized survey question for reasons to enroll. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 147–148). ACM. Retrieved from
  41. Snyder, S., & Writer, I. S. (2013). Study shows who’s taking open online college courses. Retrieved from Accessed 14 Oct 2015.
  42. Social mobility. (2017, September 1). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from
  43. Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC. Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending Boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter Open, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar
  44. Tomar, G. S., Sankaranarayanan, S., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Intelligent Conversational Agents as Facilitators and Coordinators for Group Work in Distributed Learning Environments (MOOCs). In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Retrieved from
  45. Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3–4), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Economic Mobility: The dream and the data. (2015). Retrieved from Accessed 23 May 2016.
  47. Uchidiuno, J., Ogan, A., Hammer, J., Koedinger, K., & Yarzebinski, E. (2016a). Browser Language Preferences as a Metric for Identifying ESL Speakers in MOOCs. Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale 2016. Google Scholar
  48. Uchidiuno, J., Ogan, A., Yarzebinski, E., & Hammer, J. (2016b). Understanding ESL Students’ Motivations to Increase MOOC Accessibility. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 169–172). ACM. Retrieved from
  49. Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1882–1895). ACM. Retrieved from
  50. Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Ask the Instructors: Motivations and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 206–221). ACM. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Odili Uchidiuno
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amy Ogan
    • 1
  • Evelyn Yarzebinski
    • 1
  • Jessica Hammer
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations