Another 25 Years of AIED? Challenges and Opportunities for Intelligent Educational Technologies of the Future

Article

Abstract

This paper attempts an analysis of some current trends and future developments in computer science, education, and educational technology. Based on these trends, two possible future predictions of AIED are presented in the form of a utopian vision and a dystopian vision. A comparison of these two visions leads to seven challenges that AIED might have to face in the future: intercultural and global dimensions, practical impact, privacy, interaction methods, collaboration at scale, effectiveness in multiple domains, and the role of AIED in educational technology. The paper discusses these challenges and the associated risks and opportunities.

Keywords

Aied Educational technologies Future Risks Challenges 

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (2013). The architecture of cognition. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101–108.Google Scholar
  3. Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. K. (Eds.) (2011). New perspectives on affect and learning technologies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cerf, C., & Navasky, V. (1984). The experts speak: The definitive compendium of authoritative misinformation. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  5. Core, M., Traum, D., Lane, H. C., Swartout, W., Gratch, J., VAN Lent, M., & Marsella, S. (2006). Teaching negotiation skills through practice and reflection with virtual humans. Simulation, 82(11), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DE Groot, R., Drachman, R., Hever, R., Schwarz, B. B., Hoppe, U., Harrer, A., DE Laat, M., Wegerif, R., McLaren, B. M., & Baurens, B. (2007). Computer supported moderation of e-discussions: the ARGUNAUT approach. In Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 168–170). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Hoppe, H. U. (1995). The use of multiple student modeling to parameterize group learning. In J. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of AI-ED'95, 7th world conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 234–241). Charlottesville, Virginia: AACE.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  9. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43.Google Scholar
  10. Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A data repository for the EDM community: the PSLC DataShop. Handbook of Educational data Mining, 43.Google Scholar
  11. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitrovic, A., & Koedinger, K. R. (Eds.) (2009). International journal of artificial intelligence in education, special issue on authoring intelligent tutoring systems, 19(2). Google Scholar
  13. Morgan, C., & Langford, D. (1981). Facts and fallacies: A book of definitive mistakes and misguided predictions. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: an analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98–129.Google Scholar
  15. Ogan, A., & Johnson, W. L. (Eds.) (2015). International journal of artificial intelligence in education, special issue on culturally aware educational technologies, 25(2). Google Scholar
  16. Ohlsson, S. (1994). Constraint-based student modeling, In Student modelling: the key to individualized knowledge-based instruction (pp. 167–189). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pea, R. (2014). The learning analytics workgroup. A report on building the field of learning analytics for personalized learning at scale. Available at https://ed.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/law_report_complete_09-02-2014.pdf
  18. Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread-The lessons from a New science. Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., & Aleven, V. (Eds.) (2009). International journal of artificial intelligence in education, special issue on aied applications for ill-defined domains, 19(3 + 4). Google Scholar
  20. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations