My thinking about eugenics for the past decade has drawn both on my experiences in working together with a relatively small number of eugenics survivors in the Canadian province of Alberta, where eugenic sexual sterilization legislation was in place until 1972 (Wilson 2018a), as well as on a broad range of works by historians, biologists, sociologists, philosophers, bioethicists, and journalists. Central to that thinking has been reflection on the contemporary significance of the eugenic past and on the continuing power of diverse forms of eugenic thinking (Wilson 2018b, 2019). I thus read with interest a freely-available version of “Defending Eugenics” early in 2018, although I was very surprised to see a minimally modified version of the paper appear shortly thereafter in this journal.
- Ambler, J. 2014. Immigration. EugenicsArchives.ca. http://eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/tree/53480910132156674b0002b6. Retrieved 2 Jan 2019.
- Anomaly, J. 2014. Genes, Race, and the Ethics of Belief. Hastings Center Report (Sept-Oct 2014), 50–51.Google Scholar
- Asch, A. 2003. Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible? Florida State University Law Review 30 (2): 315–342.Google Scholar
- Brock, D. 2005. Preventing Genetically Transmitted Disabilitis while Respecting Persons with Disabilities. In Quality of Life and Human Difference edited by D. Wasserman, J. Bickenbach, and R. Wachbroit, 67–100. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bruinius, H. 2006. Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America’s Quest for Racial Purity. New York: Alfred J. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Cochran, G., and H. Harpending. 2009. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Cohen, A. 2016. Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. New York: Penguin USA.Google Scholar
- Duster, Troy. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge. (first edition 1990).Google Scholar
- Evans, G. 2018. The Unwelcome Revival of ‘Race Science’. The Guardian 2nd March, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science.
- Ferguson, R.B. 2008. How Jews Became Smart: Anti- ‘Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence’. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273369474_How_Jews_Became_Smart_Anti-Natural_History_of_Ashkenazi_Intelligence.
- Galton, F. 1908. Race Improvement. In his Memories of My Life, 310-323. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Goering, Sarah. 2014. Eugenics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/eugenics/.
- Janis, I. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, J. 2006. Misinformation, Misrepresentation, and Misuse of Human Behavioral Genetics Research. Law and Contemporary Problems 69: 47–80.Google Scholar
- Kevles, D. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewontin, R. 1972. The Apportionment of Human Diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 381–398.Google Scholar
- Lombardo, P. 2008. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck vs Bell. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Parens, E. and Asch, A. 1999. Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations. Hastings Center Report, Sept-Oct 1999, S1-22. Reprinted in E. Parens and A. Asch (Eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, 3–43. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Rafter, N. 1988. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies 1977-1919. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Rafter, N. 1997. Creating Born Criminals. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Saxton, M. 2000. Why Members of the Disability Community Oppose Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion. In Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, ed. E. Parens and A. Asch, 147–164. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Turkheimer, E., and K.P. Harden. 2014. Behavior Genetic Research Methods: Testing Quasi-Causal Hypotheses with Multivariate Twin Data. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, ed. H.T. Reis and C.M. Judd, 159–187. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wade, N. 2014. A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, D. 2009. Ethical Constraints on Allowing or Causing the Existence of PEOPLE with Disabilities. In Disability and Disadvantage, edited by Kimberley Brownless and Adam Cureton, 319–351. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, R.A. 2018a. The Eugenic Mind Project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, R.A. 2018b. “Eugenics Never Went Away”, Aeon Magazine. https://aeon.co/essays/eugenics-today-where-eugenic-sterilisation-continues-now.
- Wilson, R.A. 2019. The Staying Power of Eugenic Dehumanization. In Routledge Handbook on Dehumanization, ed. M. Kronfeldner. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wilson, R.A., and J. St Pierre. 2016. Eugenics and Disability. In Rethinking Disability: World Perspectives in Culture and Society, ed. P. Devlieger, B. Mirandaa-Galarza, S. Brown, and M. Strickfaden, 93–112. Antwerp: Garant Publishing.Google Scholar