Advertisement

Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices Towards Clean Air and Active Transportation

  • Andrew Glazener
  • Haneen KhreisEmail author
Air Pollution and Health (S Adar and B Hoffmann, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Air Pollution and Health

Abstract

Purpose of Review

By 2050, 70% of the global population will live in urban areas, exposing a greater number of people to specific city-related health risks that will only be exacerbated by climate change. Two prominent health risks are poor air quality and physical inactivity. We aim to review the literature and state the best practices for clean air and active transportation in urban areas.

Recent Findings

Cities have been targeting reductions in air pollution and physical inactivity to improve population health. Oslo, Paris, and Madrid plan on banning cars from their city centers to mitigate climate change, reduce vehicle emissions, and increase walking and cycling. Urban streets are being redesigned to accommodate and integrate various modes of transportation to ensure individuals can become actively mobile and healthy. Investments in pedestrian, cycling, and public transport infrastructure and services can both improve air quality and support active transportation. Emerging technologies like electric and autonomous vehicles are being developed and may reduce air pollution but have limited impact on physical activity. Green spaces too can mitigate air pollution and encourage physical activity.

Summary

Clean air and active transportation overlap considerably as they are both functions of mobility. The best practices of clean air and active transportation have produced impressive results, which are improved when enacted simultaneously in integrated policy packages. Further research is needed in middle- and low-income countries, using measurements from real-world interventions, tracing air pollution back to the sources responsible, and holistically addressing the entire spectrum of exposures and health outcomes related to transportation.

Keywords

Cities Air pollution Active transportation Clean air Physical activity Best practices Public health 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    WHO. Air pollution. WHO. 2018. https://www.who.int/airpollution/ambient/health-impacts/en/. Accessed 13.10.2018.
  2. 2.
    Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10082):1907–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tonne C, Basagaña X, Chaix B, Huynen M, Hystad P, Nawrot TS, et al. New frontiers for environmental epidemiology in a changing world. Environ Int. 2017;104:155–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Bank. Reducing pollution. 2018. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/environment/brief/pollution. Accessed on 12.09.2018.
  5. 5.
    Patz JA, Grabow ML, Limaye VS. When it rains, it pours: future climate extremes and health. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80(4):332–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gouldson A, Sudmant A, Khreis H, Papargyropoulou E. The economic and social benefits of low-carbon cities: a systematic review of the evidence. London: Coalition for Urban Transitions; 2018. http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/cities-working-papers.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    WHO. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: physical activity. WHO. 2018. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/. Accessed 13.10 2018.
  8. 8.
    WHO. Physical inactivity: a global public health problem. 2018. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/. Accessed 12.09 2018.
  9. 9.
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E, Gerike R, et al. Health impact assessment of active transportation: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2015;76:103–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Khreis H, Verlinghieri E, Rojas-Rueda D. Transport and health: a marriage of convenience or an absolute necessity. Environ Int. 2016;88:150–2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    UN. 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 12.09.2018.
  12. 12.
    Hoffmann B. Air pollution in cities: urban and transport planning determinants and health in cities. In: Nieuwenhuijsen M, Khreis H, editors. Integrating human health into urban and transport planning: a framework. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li W, Kamargianni M. Air pollution and seasonality effects on mode choice in China. Transp Res Rec. 2017;2634:101–9.  https://doi.org/10.3141/2634-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    WHO. WHO Global Ambient Air Quality Database. 2018. https://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/cities/en/. Accessed 15.08 2018.
  15. 15.
    EPA. Air quality—cities and counties. 2017. https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-cities-and-counties. Accessed 10.09 2018.
  16. 16.
    BBC. Indian Cities Dominate World Air Pollution List. 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-43972155. Accessed 08.08 2018.
  17. 17.
    Requia WJ, Mohamed M, Higgins CD, Arain A, Ferguson M. How clean are electric vehicles? Evidence-based review of the effects of electric mobility on air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions and human health. Atmos Environ. 2018;185:64–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    EEA. Air quality in europe—2017 report. 2017. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2017. Accessed 27.08.2018.
  19. 19.
    WHO. Health effects of transport-related air pollution. 2005. Accessed 10.08.2018.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Health Effects Institute. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. HEI special report 17. 2010. Accessed on 10.10.2018.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu F, Xu D, Cheng Y, Dong S, Guo C, Jiang X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the adverse health effects of ambient PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in the Chinese population. Environ Res. 2015;136:196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beelen R, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Stafoggia M, Andersen ZJ, Weinmayr G, Hoffmann B, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on natural-cause mortality: an analysis of 22 European cohorts within the multicentre ESCAPE project. Lancet. 2014;383(9919):785–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62158-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Beelen R, Samoli E, Stafoggia M, Weinmayr G, et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(9):813–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70279-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    MacIntyre EA, Gehring U, Mölter A, Fuertes E, Klümper C, Krämer U, et al. Air pollution and respiratory infections during early childhood: an analysis of 10 European birth cohorts within the ESCAPE Project. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;122(1):107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khreis H, Kelly C, Tate J, Parslow R, Lucas K, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2017;100:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumar P, Patton AP, Durant JL, Frey HC. A review of factors impacting exposure to PM2.5, ultrafine particles and black carbon in Asian transport microenvironments. Atmos Environ. 2018;187:301–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Manzanares S, Dadvand P, Schembari A, Rankin J, et al. Ambient air pollution and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(5):598–606.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robert D, Brook SR, Arden Pope C 3rd, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. American Heart Association Circulation. 2010;121(21):2331–78.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eze IC, Hemkens LG, Bucher HC, Hoffmann B, Schindler C, Künzli N, et al. Association between ambient air pollution and diabetes mellitus in Europe and North America: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(5):381–9.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307823.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jerrett M, McConnell R, Wolch J, Chang R, Lam C, Dunton G, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and obesity formation in children: a longitudinal, multilevel analysis. Environ Health. 2014;13:49.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Raz R, Roberts AL, Lyall K, Hart JE, Just AC, Laden F, et al. Autism spectrum disorder and particulate matter air pollution before, during, and after pregnancy: a nested case–control analysis within the Nurses’ Health Study II Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(3):264–70.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Power MC, Adar SD, Yanosky JD, Weuve J. Exposure to air pollution as a potential contributor to cognitive function, cognitive decline, brain imaging, and dementia: a systematic review of epidemiologic research. Neurotoxicology. 2016;56:235–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.06.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sapkota A, Chelikowsky AP, Nachman KE, Cohen AJ, Ritz B. Exposure to particulate matter and adverse birth outcomes: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. 2012;5(4):369–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-010-0106-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EEA. Emissions of the main air pollutants in Europe. 2018. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/main-anthropogenic-air-pollutant-emissions/assessment-4. Accessed 09.10 2018.
  35. 35.
    IARC. Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths. Press release 221 ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Accessed on 14.09.2018Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Straif K, Cohen AJ, Samet J. Air pollution and cancer. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Contract No.: 161. Accessed on 17.09.2018.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Pertega S, Garnelo L, Castro TP, Sampedro M, Lastres JS, et al. Truck traffic related air pollution associated with asthma symptoms in young boys: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2013;127(3):275–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Svendsen ER, Gonzales M, Mukerjee S, Smith L, Ross M, Walsh D, et al. GIS-modeled indicators of traffic-related air pollutants and adverse pulmonary health among children in El Paso, Texas. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(suppl_7):S131–S41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gruzieva O, Bergström A, Hulchiy O, Kull I, Lind T, Melén E, et al. Exposure to air pollution from traffic and childhood asthma until 12 years of age. Epidemiology. 2013;24(1):54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318276c1ea.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McConnell R, Islam T, Shankardass K, Jerrett M, Lurmann F, Gilliland F, et al. Childhood incident asthma and traffic-related air pollution at home and school. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(7):1021–6.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hime N, Marks G, Cowie C. A comparison of the health effects of ambient particulate matter air pollution from five emission sources. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Berger K, Malig BJ, Hasheminassab S, Pearson DL, Sioutas C, Ostro B, et al. Associations of source-apportioned fine particles with cause-specific mortality in California. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;29(5):639–48.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khreis H, de Hoogh K, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Full-chain health impact assessment of traffic-related air pollution and childhood asthma. Environ Int. 2018;114:365–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Di Q, Wang Y, Zanobetti A, Wang Y, Koutrakis P, Choirat C, et al. Air pollution and mortality in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(26):2513–22.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    WHO. Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. 2018. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health. Accessed 14.07 2018.
  46. 46.
    Pinault LL, Weichenthal S, Crouse DL, Brauer M, Erickson A, Donkelaar AV, et al. Associations between fine particulate matter and mortality in the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort. Environ Res. 2017;159:406–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    European Commission E. Air quality standards. European Commission. 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm. Accessed on 15.09.2018.
  48. 48.
    Environmental Protection Agency E. NAAQS Table. Criteria Air Pollutants. EPA. 2016. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table. Accessed on 12.10.2018.
  49. 49.
    Josh Miller LD, Kodjak D. Impacts of world-class vehicle efficiency and emissions regulations in select G20 countries. The International Council on Clean Transportation. 2017. Accessed on 15.10.2018.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nesbit M, Fergusson M, Colsa A, Ohlendorf J, Hayes MC, Paquel K, Schweitzer JP. Comparative study on the differences between the EU and the US legislation on emissions in the automotive sector: European Parliament 2016. Accessed on 15.10.2018.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    EEA. Air Pollution. EEA. 2017. https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/intro. Accessed 12.09 2018.
  52. 52.
    Chossière GP, Malina R, Allroggen F, Eastham SD, Speth RL, Barrett SRH. Country- and manufacturer-level attribution of air quality impacts due to excess NOx emissions from diesel passenger vehicles in Europe. Atmos Environ. 2018;189:89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dieselnet. United States: cars and light-duty trucks: tier 3. 2016. https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php. Accessed on 13.10.2018.
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Smith M, Hosking J, Woodward A, Witten K, MacMillan A, Field A, et al. Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport—an update and new findings on health equity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):158.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang L, Wen C. The relationship between the neighborhood built environment and active transportation among adults: a systematic literature review. Urban Sci. 2017;1(3):29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cascetta E, Cartenì A. A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: theory and a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2014;8(1):84–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.758532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wang L, Li L, Wu B, Bai Y. Private car switched to public transit by commuters, in Shanghai, China. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;96:1293–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Winters M, Buehler R, Götschi T. Policies to promote active travel: evidence from reviews of the literature. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4(3):278–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Raza W, Forsberg B, Johansson C, Sommar JN. Air pollution as a risk factor in health impact assessments of a travel mode shift towards cycling. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1429081.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1429081.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tainio M, de Nazelle AJ, Götschi T, Kahlmeier S, Rojas-Rueda D, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Prev Med. 2016;87:233–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    de Nazelle A, Bode O, Orjuela JP. Comparison of air pollution exposures in active vs. passive travel modes in European cities: a quantitative review. Environ Int. 2017;99:151–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ham W, Vijayan A, Schulte N, Herner JD. Commuter exposure to PM2.5, BC, and UFP in six common transport microenvironments in Sacramento, California. Atmos Environ. 2017;167:335–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    • Cepeda M, Schoufour J, Freak-Poli R, Koolhaas CM, Dhana K, Bramer WM, et al. Levels of ambient air pollution according to mode of transport: a systematic review. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(1):e23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30021-4 A systematic review of air pollution exposure differences by transportation mode. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Apparicio P, Gelb J, Carrier M, Mathieu M-È, Kingham S. Exposure to noise and air pollution by mode of transportation during rush hours in Montreal. J Transp Geogr. 2018;70:182–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    MacNaughton P, Melly S, Vallarino J, Adamkiewicz G, Spengler JD. Impact of bicycle route type on exposure to traffic-related air pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2014;490:37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Khreis H. Car free cities: pathway to healthy urban living. Environ Int. 2016;94:251–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    C40. Green and healthy streets: fossil-fuel-free streets declaration—planned ACtions to Deliver Commitments. C40. 2018. https://c40-production-images.s3.amazonaws.com/other_uploads/images/1426_C40_FFF_260918.original.pdf?1537953007. Accessed 4.12 2018.
  69. 69.
    Bliss L. The war on cars, Norwegian edition. 2018. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/05/oslos-race-to-become-a-major-bike-haven/559358/. Accessed 10.10 2018.
  70. 70.
    Plastrik PCJ. Game changers: bold actiongs by cities to accelerate progress toward carbon neutrality. 2018. http://carbonneutralcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CNCA-Game-Changers-Report-2018.pdf. Accessed 10.10 2018.
  71. 71.
    Garfield L. Cities that are starting to ban cars. Business Insider. 2017. https://www.businessinsider.com/cities-going-car-free-ban-2017-8. Accessed on 10.09.2018.
  72. 72.
    Khreis H, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Nairobi is planning car-free days. They could bring many benefits. The Conversation. 2018. https://theconversation.com/nairobi-is-planning-car-free-days-they-could-bring-many-benefits-99301. Accessed on 15.10.2018.
  73. 73.
    Torres A, Sarmiento OL, Stauber C, Zarama R. The Ciclovia and Cicloruta programs: promising interventions to promote physical activity and social capital in Bogotá, Colombia. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(2):e23–30.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sarmiento OL, Díaz del Castillo A, Triana CA, Acevedo MJ, Gonzalez SA, Pratt M. Reclaiming the streets for people: insights from Ciclovías Recreativas in Latin America. Prev Med. 2017;103:S34–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shu S, Batteate C, Cole B, Froines J, Zhu Y. Air quality impacts of a CicLAvia event in downtown Los Angeles, CA. Environ Pollut. 2016;208:170–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hipp JA, Bird A, van Bakergem M, Yarnall E. Moving targets: promoting physical activity in public spaces via open streets in the US. Prev Med. 2017;103:S15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jiang W, Boltze M, Groer S, Scheuvens D. Impacts of low emission zones in Germany on air pollution levels. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;25:3370–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cavallaro F, Giaretta F, Nocera S. The potential of road pricing schemes to reduce carbon emissions. Transp Policy. 2018;67:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wu K, Chen Y, Ma J, Bai S, Tang X. Traffic and emissions impact of congestion charging in the central Beijing urban area: a simulation analysis. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2017;51:203–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Millard-Ball A, Weinberger RR, Hampshire RC. Is the curb 80% full or 20% empty? Assessing the impacts of San Francisco’s parking pricing experiment. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2014;63:76–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ciccone A. Is it all about CO2 emissions? The environmental effects of a tax reform for new vehicles in Norway: University of Oslo, Department of Economics 2014. Accessed on 12.09.2018.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zimmer A, Koch N. Fuel consumption dynamics in Europe: tax reform implications for air pollution and carbon emissions. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2017;106:22–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Soret A, Guevara M, Baldasano JM. The potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality in the urban areas of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain). Atmos Environ. 2014;99:51–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Sabel CE, Hiscock R, Asikainen A, Bi J, Depledge M, van den Elshout S, et al. Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change: findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project. Environ Health. 2016;15(1):S25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    EPA. Sources of greenhouse gas emissions. EPA, EPA.gov. 2016. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions#main-content. Accessed on 10.12.2018.
  86. 86.
    Lorentzen E, Haugneland P, Bu C, Hauge E. Charging infrastructure experience in Norway—the worlds most advanced EV market. 2017. https://wpstatic.idium.no/elbil.no/2016/08/EVS30-Charging-infrastrucure-experiences-in-Norway-paper.pdf. Accessed on 21.10.2018.
  87. 87.
    Figenbaum E. Perspectives on Norway’s supercharged electric vehicle policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2017;25:14–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Timmers VRJH, Achten PAJ. Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. Atmos Environ. 2016;134:10–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Eckart J. Batteries can be part of the fight against climate change—if we do these five things. World Economic Forum. 2017. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/battery-batteries-electric-cars-carbon-sustainable-power-energy/. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
  90. 90.
    • Milakis D, van Arem B, van Wee B. Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J Intell Transp Syst. 2017;21(4):324–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351 A study on the air quality benefits of autonomous vehicles. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Woolsgrove C. Cycling and motor vehicle and safety. European Cyclists’ Federation 2017. https://ecf.com/sites/ecf.com/files/ECF_position_RSafety_Programme_2020-2030.pdf
  92. 92.
    • Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2207–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2 A review of active transportation impacts determined by built environment designs. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Boulange C, Gunn L, Giles-Corti B, Mavoa S, Pettit C, Badland H. Examining associations between urban design attributes and transport mode choice for walking, cycling, public transport and private motor vehicle trips. J Transp Health. 2017;6:155–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    • Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Andersen ZJ, Braun-Fahrländer C, Bruha J, Bruhova-Foltynova H, et al. Health impacts of active transportation in Europe. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149990.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149990 A health impact analysis of active transportation in European cities. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Salmon M, Martinez D, Ambros A, Brand C, et al. Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities. Prev Med. 2018;109:62–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rueda S. Superblocks for the design of new cities and renovation of existing ones: Barcelona’s case. In: Nieuwenhuijsen M, Khreis H, editors. Integrating human health into urban and transport planning: a framework. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Brass K. Redesigning the grid: Barcelona’s experiment with superblocks. Urban Land Institute. 2017. https://urbanland.uli.org/planning-design/barcelonas-experiment-superblocks/. Accessed October, 29 2017.
  98. 98.
    Kostandinovic N. The implementation of the superblock programme in Barcelona: filling our streets with life. 2018. https://www.c40.org/case_studies/barcelona-superblocks. Accessed on 12.11.2018.
  99. 99.
    Skilton S. The best complete street policies of 2016. National Complete Streets Coalition. 2017. https://smartgrowthamerica.org/app/uploads/2017/06/best-complete-streets-policies-of-2016-1.pdf. Accessed on 10.10.2018.
  100. 100.
    Schlossberg M, Rowell J, Amos D, Sanford K. Rethinking streets: an evidence-based guide to 25 complete street transformations. 2015. Accessed 10.09.2018. https://pages.uoregon.edu/schlossb/ftp/RS/RethinkingStreets_All_V2_high_wCover.pdf. Accessed on 21.10.2018.
  101. 101.
    Brown BB, Smith KR, Tharp D, Werner CM, Tribby CP, Miller HJ, et al. A complete street intervention promote walking to transit, non-transit walking, and bicycling: a quasi-experimental demonstration of increased use. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(11):1210–9.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0066.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Yifang Zhu RW, Shu S, McGuckin N. Effects of complete streets on travel behavior and exposure to vehicular emissions. 2016. https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/11-312.pdf. Accessed 11.09.2018.
  103. 103.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health—new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. Environ Health. 2016;15(Suppl 1):38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0108-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res. 2018;166:628–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Zijlema WL, Avila-Palencia I, Triguero-Mas M, Gidlow C, Maas J, Kruize H, et al. Active commuting through natural environments is associated with better mental health: results from the PHENOTYPE project. Environ Int. 2018;121:721–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yli-Pelkonen V, Setälä H, Viippola V. Urban forests near roads do not reduce gaseous air pollutant concentrations but have an impact on particles levels. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;158:39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Selmi W, Weber C, Rivière E, Blond N, Mehdi L, Nowak D. Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France. Urban For Urban Green. 2016;17:192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Jayasooriya VM, Ng AWM, Muthukumaran S, Perera BJC. Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality. Urban For Urban Green. 2017;21:34–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    McDonald RKT, Boucher T, Longzhu T, Salem R. Planting healthy air: a global analysis of the role of urban trees in addressing particulate matter pollution and extreme heat. Arlington County: The Nature Conservancy; 2016.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Lee ACK, Jordan HC, Horsley J. Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015;8:131–7.  https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S61654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Hartig T, Mitchell R, Vries SD, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):207–28.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    de Vries S, van Dillen SME, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P. Streetscape greenery and health: stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:26–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Batista Ferrer H, Cooper A, Audrey S. Associations of mode of travel to work with physical activity, and individual, interpersonal, organisational, and environmental characteristics. J Transp Health. 2018;9:45–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Patterson R, Webb E, Millett C, Laverty AA. Physical activity accrued as part of public transport use in England. J Public Health. 2018:fdy099.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy099.
  115. 115.
    Martin A, Panter J, Suhrcke M, Ogilvie D. Impact of changes in mode of travel to work on changes in body mass index: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(8):753–61.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-205211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Flint E, Webb E, Cummins S. Change in commute mode and body-mass index: prospective, longitudinal evidence from UK Biobank. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1(2):e46–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30006-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    USDOT. Cleaner air—relationship to public health. USDOT, Transportation.gov. 2015. https://www.transportation.gov/mission/health/cleaner-air. Accessed October 23 2018.
  118. 118.
    FTA. Transit’s role in environmental sustainability. 2016. https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/environmental-programs/transit-environmental-sustainability/transit-role. Accessed October 15 2018.
  119. 119.
    Basagaña X, Triguero-Mas M, Agis D, Pérez N, Reche C, Alastuey A, et al. Effect of public transport strikes on air pollution levels in Barcelona (Spain). Sci Total Environ. 2018;610–611:1076–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Bauernschuster S, Hener T, Rainer H. When labor disputes bring cities to a standstill: the impact of public transit strikes on traffic, accidents, air pollution, and health. Am Econ J Econ Pol. 2017;9(1):1–37.  https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Gilliland F, Avol E, McConnell R, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Lurman F et al. The effects of policy-driven air quality improvements on children’s respiratory health: Health Eff Inst. 2017. Accessed on 10.10.2018.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Zhang J, Zhu T, Kipen H, Wang G, Huang W, Rich D, et al. Cardiorespiratory biomarker responses in healthy young adults to drastic air quality changes surrounding the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2013;(174):5–174.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Berger J. Copenhagen, striving to be carbon-neutral: part 1, the economic payoffs. 2017. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/copenhagen-striving-to-be-carbon-neutral-part-1-the_us_589ba337e4b061551b3e0737. Accessed on 11.10.2018.
  124. 124.
    Copenhagen Co. Copenhagen: city of cyclists facts and figures 2017. http://www.cycling-embassy.dk/2017/07/04/copenhagen-city-cyclists-facts-figures-2017/. Accessed on 10.09.2018.
  125. 125.
    Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1930–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    • Franco JF, Segura JF, Mura I. Air pollution alongside bike-paths in Bogotá-Colombia. Front Environ Sci. 2016;4(77).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00077 This study details the air quality and physical activity benefits of a successful active transportation policy.
  127. 127.
    Glazener A, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Mindell JS, Khreis H. Mobility and public health: a conceptual model and literature review. In Progress. 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advancing Research in Transportation, Emissions, Energy, and Health (CARTEEH)Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI)College StationUSA
  2. 2.Langford College of ArchitectureTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL)BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)BarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations