Advertisement

Current Environmental Health Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 370–378 | Cite as

The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Through the Lens of Human Health and the Ecosystem

  • Maureen Lichtveld
  • Samendra Sherchan
  • Kaitlyn B. Gam
  • Richard K. Kwok
  • Christopher Mundorf
  • Arti Shankar
  • Lissa Soares
Global Environmental Health and Sustainability (W Al-Delaimy, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Global Environmental Health and Sustainability

Abstract

This review examines current research ascertaining the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on human health and ecosystems. Driven by the need to strategically focus research funding, the authors also assess the implications of those findings and promote a transdisciplinary research agenda addressing critical gaps.Epidemiologic studies conducted in workers and vulnerable communities in the spill’s aftermath showed that non-chemical stressors affect resilience. Ecosystem-wise salt marsh species showed variability in structural and functional changes, attributed to species-specific tolerance, oil exposure, and belowground plant organs damage.Lacking baseline exposure assessment data hampers assessing the impact of chemical stressors. Research priorities include leveraging existing women/child dyads and worker cohorts to advance exposure characterization and counter early adverse effects in most vulnerable populations. Key policy gaps include mandated just-in-time emergency resources to ascertain immediate post-event exposures and contemporary legislation addressing human and ecosystem health in an integrated rather than silo fashion.

Keywords

Human health Ecosystem Exposure Non-chemical stressors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grant number 5U19ES020677. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

This research was supported in part by the Gulf Region Health Outreach Program, which is funded from the Deepwater Horizon Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement approved by the US District Court in New Orleans on January 11, 2013 and made effective on February 12, 2014.

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Maureen Lichtveld reports grants from NIH/NIEHS and GRHOP. Christopher Mundorf reports grants from National Institutes of Health. Samendra Sherchan, Kaitlyn B. Gam, Richard K. Kwok, Arti Shankar, and Lissa Soares declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. 1.
    Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative. Investigating the effect of oil spills on the environment and human health. 2013. http://gulfresearchinitiative.org/. Accessed 08/21/2016.
  2. 2.
    National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation—where discoveries begin. https://www.nsf.gov/. Accessed 08/21/2016.
  3. 3.
    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gulf Research Program. 2016. http://www.nationalacademies.org/gulf/index.html. Accessed 08/21/2016.
  4. 4.•
    Goldstein BD, Osofsky HJ, Lichtveld MY. The gulf oil spill. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1334–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1007197. This manuscript provides a more comprehensive description of clinical and public health consequences and attention to the vulnerable populations on the US Gulf Coast. The manuscript also examines how the research agenda set by the IOM/NAS can advance addressing health concerns. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwok RK, Engel LS, Miller AK, et al. (in press) The GuLF STUDY: a prospective study of persons involved in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and clean-up. Environ Health Perspect. doi:  10.1289/EHP715
  6. 6.
    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia. http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/centers/gulfconsortium/. Accessed 08/22/2016.
  7. 7.
    Deepwater Horizon Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement Agreement. Case 2:12-cv-00968-CJB-SS. EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. https://deepwaterhorizonmedicalsettlement.com/en-us/courtbrdocuments/MedicalClassActionComplaint.aspx. Accessed 04/16/2012.
  8. 8.
    Mendelssohn IA, Andersen GL, Baltz DM, et al. Oil impacts on coastal wetlands: implications for the Mississippi River Delta ecosystem after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Bioscience. 2012;62(6):562–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elliot D. 5 Years after BP oil spill, Effects linger and recovery is slow. Morning Edition 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams A. Summary of Information concerning the Ecological and Economic Impacts of the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Disaster. Nat Res Def Counc 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson C, editor. Ecology, ecosystems services and related methodologies. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill & Ecosystem Science Conference 2016; Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biedron SE. Time for action: six years after Deepwater Horizon Washington DC. USA: Oceana; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beyer J, Trannum HC, Bakke T, et al. Environmental effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: a review. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;110:28–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin Q, Mendelssohn IA, Graham SA, et al. Response of salt marshes to oiling from the Deepwater Horizon spill: implications for plant growth, soil surface-erosion, and shoreline stability. Sci Total Environ. 2016;557:369–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turner RE, McClenachan G, Tweel AW. Islands in the oil: quantifying salt marsh shoreline erosion after the Deepwater Horizon oiling. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;110(1):316–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNutt MK, Camilli R, Crone TJ, et al. Review of flow rate estimates of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(50):20260–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    US Coast Guard. On scene coordinator report Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Submitted to the National Response Team, September 2011. Retrieved October. 2011;10:2014.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Middlebrook AM, Murphy DM, Ahmadov R, et al. Air quality implications of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(50):20280–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Allan SE, Smith BW, Anderson KA. Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Gulf of Mexico coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(4):2033-9. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/pacs/index.html. Accessed 08/21 2016.
  20. 20.
    Roberts JR, Reynolds JS, Thompson JA, et al. Pulmonary effects after acute inhalation of oil dispersant (COREXIT EC9500A) in rats. J Toxic Environ Health A. 2011;74(21):1381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roberts JR, Anderson SE, Kan H, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary and systemic toxicity of oil dispersant (COREXIT EC9500A((R))) following acute repeated inhalation exposure. Environ Health Insights. 2014;8 Suppl 1:63–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson SE, Franko J, Lukomska E, et al. Potential immunotoxicological health effects following exposure to COREXIT 9500A during cleanup of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. J Toxic Environ Health A. 2011;74(21):1419–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harville EW, Xiong X, Smith BW, et al. Combined effects of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Gustav on the mental health of mothers of small children. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18(4):288–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.•
    McCoy MA, Salerno JA. Assessing the effects of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on human health. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences; 2010. Assessing the effects of the home oil spill on human health, this article sets the first national human health research agenda shortly after the oil spill. Noteworthy is the prominent placement of the psychosocial and behavioral effects and the emphasis on resilience as a key area of study alongside more traditional chemical stressors. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldman L, Mitchell A, Patlak M. Review of the proposal for the gulf long-term follow-up study: highlights from the September 2010 workshop: workshop report. National Academies Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lowe SR, Kwok RK, Payne J, et al. Mental health service use by cleanup workers in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:125–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Canfield C, Angove, R., Boselovic, J., et al. Developing a community-based participatory research curriculum to support environmental health research partnerships: an initiative of the GROWH Community Outreach and Dissemination Core. Int J Nursing Clin Practice. 2016;3(187).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson MJ, Frickel S, Nguyen D, et al. A targeted health risk assessment following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in Vietnamese-American shrimp consumers. Environ Health Perspect(Online). 2015;123(2):152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jacobs MB, Harville EW, editors. Long-term mental health among low-income, minority women following exposure to multiple natural disasters in early and late adolescence compared to adulthood. Child & Youth Care Forum; 2015: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grattan LM, Roberts S, Mahan Jr WT, et al. The early psychological impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on Florida and Alabama communities. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):838.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rung AL, Gaston S, Oral E, et al. Depression, mental distress and domestic conflict among Louisiana women exposed to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the WaTCH Study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2016.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rung AL, Oral E, Fontham E, et al. Mental health impact of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill among wives of clean-up workers. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2015;26(4):e44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.•
    Lichtveld MY, Shankar A, Mundorf C, et al. Measuring the Developing Therapeutic Relationship Between Pregnant Women and Community Health Workers Over the Course of the Pregnancy in a Study Intervention. J Comm Health. 2016:1-10. This manuscript describes for the first time a quantitative strategy to measure the impact of the relationship between a community health worker and a pregnant woman participant in a non-clinical setting using a modified Scale to Assess the Therapeutic Relationship (STAR) assessment tool. To date, the STAR has been exclusively used in clinical settings. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mundorf CA, Lichtveld MY. Using community-based, ethnographic methods to examine risk perceptions and actions of low-income, first-time mothers in a post-spill environment. J Risk Res. 2016:1-15Google Scholar
  35. 35.•
    Laffon B, Pasaro E, Valdiglesias V. Effects of exposure to oil spills on human health: updated review. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B, Crit Rev. 2016;19(3-4):105–28. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2016.1168730. This article is the most updated comprehensive review of human health effects of oil spill exposure. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Palinkas LA. A conceptual framework for understanding the mental health impacts of oil spills: lessons from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Psychiatry. 2012;75(3):203–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buttke D, Vagi S, Bayleyegn T, et al. Mental health needs assessment after the Gulf Coast oil spill—Alabama and Mississippi, 2010. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2012;27(5):401–8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x12001100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gill DA, Picou JS, Ritchie LA. The Exxon Valdez and BP oil spills: a comparison of initial social and psychological impacts. Am Behav Sci. 2011:0002764211408585.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cherry KE, Sampson L, Nezat PF, et al. Long-term psychological outcomes in older adults after disaster: relationships to religiosity and social support. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(5):430–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lyons RA, Temple JM, Evans DF, et al. Acute health effects of the Sea Empress oil spill. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(5):306–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gallacher J, Bronstering K, Palmer S, et al. Symptomatology attributable to psychological exposure to a chemical incident: a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(6):506–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carrasco JM, Pérez-Gómez B, García-Mendizábal MJ, et al. Health-related quality of life and mental health in the medium-term aftermath of the Prestige oil spill in Galiza (Spain): a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huynh T, Ramachandran G, Banerjee S, et al. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014;58(9):1126–42. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baccarelli A, Pfeiffer R, Consonni D, et al. Handling of dioxin measurement data in the presence of non-detectable values: overview of available methods and their application in the Seveso chloracne study. Chemosphere. 2005;60(7):898–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lubin JH, Colt JS, Camann D, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;1691–6.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hewett P, Ganser GH. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(7):611–32.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Juarez PD, Matthews-Juarez P, Hood DB, et al. The public health exposome: a population-based, exposure science approach to health disparities research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(12):12866–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Langston MA, Levine RS, Kilbourne BJ, et al. Scalable combinatorial tools for health disparities research. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2014;11(10):10419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lichtveld M, Kennedy S, Krouse RZ, et al. From design to dissemination: implementing community-based participatory research in postdisaster communities. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(7):1235–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Manly BJ. Statistics for environmental science and management. Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2001.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gilbert RO. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1987.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abramson DM, Grattan LM, Mayer B, et al. The resilience activation framework: a conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post-disaster settings. J behav Health Serv Res. 2015;42(1):42–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mundorf C, Shankar A, Peng T, et al. Therapeutic relationship and study adherence in a community health worker-led intervention. Journal of Community Health. 2016:1-9Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Birkland TA, DeYoung SE. Emergency response, doctrinal confusion, and federalism in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Publius: J Federalism. 2011;41(3):471–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ngo D, Gibbons JL, Scire G, et al. Mental health needs in Vietnamese American communities affected by the gulf oil spill. Psychology. 2014;5(2):109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mayer B, Running K, Bergstrand K, et al. Compensation and community corrosion: perceived inequalities, social comparisons, and competition following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Sociological Forum; 2015: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    The Gulf Research Program. A strategic vision. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peres LC, Trapido E, Rung AL, et al. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill and physical health among adult women in Southern Louisiana: the Women and Their Children’s Health (WaTCH) study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gulf Coast Health Alliance. Project 1: Community health assessment of health risks associated with the Macondo Spill: increasing resilience in diverse vulnerable communities. https://www.utmb.edu/GCHARMS/project_1.asp. Accessed 09/25/2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maureen Lichtveld
    • 1
  • Samendra Sherchan
    • 1
  • Kaitlyn B. Gam
    • 2
    • 3
  • Richard K. Kwok
    • 2
  • Christopher Mundorf
    • 4
  • Arti Shankar
    • 5
  • Lissa Soares
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Global Environmental Health SciencesTulane School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  3. 3.Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  4. 4.Hiram CollegeHiramUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsTulane School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations