Advertisement

Current Environmental Health Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 405–415 | Cite as

Tungsten: an Emerging Toxicant, Alone or in Combination

  • Alicia M. Bolt
  • Koren K. Mann
Metals and Health (A Barchowsky, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Metals and Health

Abstract

Purpose of review

Tungsten is an emerging environmental toxicant, yet our understanding of the potential risks of exposure on human health is still limited.

Recent findings

In this review, we will discuss populations most at risk of exposure to high concentrations of tungsten. In addition, we will highlight what is known about the toxicity profile of tungsten compounds, based on epidemiological, in vitro, and in vivo studies, focusing on bone, immune, pulmonary, and cancer outcomes. Of note, emerging evidence indicates that tungsten can augment the effects of other stimulants, stressors, and toxicants. Of particular importance may be tungsten-cobalt mixtures that seem to be more toxic than either metal alone. This is important because it means that we cannot just evaluate the toxicity of tungsten in isolation. Finally, we still have limited information of how many of the in vitro and in vivo findings translate to human populations, so it will be important to conduct epidemiology studies in highly exposed populations to adequately address the potential risks of tungsten exposure on human health.

Summary

Together, we discuss recent findings that support further investigation into the toxicities of tungsten alone and in combination with other metals.

Keywords

Tungsten Tungsten carbide Cobalt Metals Toxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-137149 and MOP-142227 and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2015-04919.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    EPA, Emerging contaminant tungsten. Fact sheet, in 505-F-070-005. 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    NTP, Priority substance list nomination summary—tungsten. 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, A., Toxicological profile for tungsten. 2005. www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp186.pdf. Last Accessed: April 29th, 2016.
  4. 4.
    Keith LS et al. ATSDR evaluation of potential for human exposure to tungsten. Toxicol Ind Health. 2007;23(5-6):309–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin CS et al. Investigating childhood leukemia in Churchill County, Nevada. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(1):151–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.••
    Bolt AM et al. Tungsten targets the tumor microenvironment to enhance breast cancer metastasis. Toxicol Sci. 2015;143(1):165–77. This study showed that tungsten remained in the human body years after the original source of the exposure was removed, suggesting that a secondary storage site for tungsten exists. In addition, tungsten promoted murine breast cancer metastasis to the lung by modulating the tumor microenvironment rather than the primary tumor cells.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaitens JSK, Condon M, Centeno J, McDiarmid M. Mobilization of metals from embedded fragments in a cohort of US veterans. Society of Toxicology 2015 Annual Meeting abstract 345 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kraus T et al. Exposure assessment in the hard metal manufacturing industry with special regard to tungsten and its compounds. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(10):631–4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemus R, Venezia CF. An update to the toxicological profile for water-soluble and sparingly soluble tungsten substances. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2015;45(5):388–411.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lassner ESWD. Tungsten—properties, chemistry, technology of the element, alloys, and chemical compounds. New York: Kluwer; 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weast RC. Handbook of chemistry and physics. 54th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1973.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CDC, NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Tungsten. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0645.html. Last Accessed: April 29th, 2016.
  13. 13.
    OECD SIDS, Tungsten carbide. 2005: [Unpublished Report] Washington, DC. http://www.inchem.org/documents/sids/sids/12070121.pdf. Last Accessed: April 29th, 2016.
  14. 14.
    RCC NOTOX BV, Determination of the water solubility of sodium metatungstate. 1992: [Unpublished Report] Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baes Jr CFMRE. The hydrolysis of cations. New York: Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Official (ASTSWMO), Tungsten Issues Paper. 2011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dermatas DBW, Christodoulatos C. Solubility, sorption, and soil respiration effects of tungsten and tungsten alloys. Environ Forensics. 2004;5(1):5–13. www.astswmo.org/Files/Policies_and_Publications/Federal_Facilities/2011-02_FINAL_Tungsten_Issues_2-0.pdf. Last Accessed: April 29th, 2016.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koutsospyros A et al. A review of tungsten: from environmental obscurity to scrutiny. J Hazard Mater. 2006;136(1):1–19.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armstead AL, Arena CB, Li B. Exploring the potential role of tungsten carbide cobalt (WC-Co) nanoparticle internalization in observed toxicity toward lung epithelial cells in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;278(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lombaert N et al. Evaluation of the apoptogenic potential of hard metal dust (WC-Co), tungsten carbide and metallic cobalt. Toxicol Lett. 2004;154(1-2):23–34.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lombaert N et al. In vitro expression of hard metal dust (WC-Co)—responsive genes in human peripheral blood mononucleated cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;227(2):299–312.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lombaert N et al. Hard-metal (WC-Co) particles trigger a signaling cascade involving p38 MAPK, HIF-1alpha, HMOX1, and p53 activation in human PBMC. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87(2):259–68.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anard D et al. In vitro genotoxic effects of hard metal particles assessed by alkaline single cell gel and elution assays. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(1):177–84.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lison D, Lauwerys R. In vitro cytotoxic effects of cobalt-containing dusts on mouse peritoneal and rat alveolar macrophages. Environ Res. 1990;52(2):187–98.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller AC et al. Neoplastic transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by heavy metal-tungsten alloy particles: induction of genotoxic effects. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22(1):115–25.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harris RM et al. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative DNA damage mediate the cytotoxicity of tungsten-nickel-cobalt alloys in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;250(1):19–28.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verma R et al. In vitro profiling of epigenetic modifications underlying heavy metal toxicity of tungsten-alloy and its components. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;253(3):178–87.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ding M et al. Size-dependent effects of tungsten carbide-cobalt particles on oxygen radical production and activation of cell signaling pathways in murine epidermal cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;241(3):260–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Emond CA et al. Induction of rhabdomyosarcoma by embedded military-grade tungsten/nickel/cobalt not by tungsten/nickel/iron in the B6C3F1 mouse. Int J Toxicol. 2015;34(1):44–54.Google Scholar
  30. 30.••
    Emond CA, Vergara VB, Lombardini ED, Mog SR, Kalinich JF. The role of the component metals in the toxicity of military-grade tungsten alloy. Toxics. 2015;3(4):499–514. This study demonstrated that tungsten/nickel/cobalt pellets were more potent inducers of rhabdomyosarcoma tumors than individual metal components alone or two metal combinations, providing evidence of synergy between tungsten and other metals to promote cancer.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kalinich JF et al. Embedded weapons-grade tungsten alloy shrapnel rapidly induces metastatic high-grade rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(6):729–34.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mezentseva N, Tungsten. In: Izreal’son ZI, ed. Toxicology of the rare metals. (Toksikologiya redkikh metallov). Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations. 1967. AEC-tr 6710: 28–35.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lasfargues G et al. Comparative study of the acute lung toxicity of pure cobalt powder and cobalt-tungsten carbide mixture in rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992;112(1):41–50.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roedel EQ et al. Pulmonary toxicity after exposure to military-relevant heavy metal tungsten alloy particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;259(1):74–86.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rengasamy A et al. Effects of hard metal on nitric oxide pathways and airway reactivity to methacholine in rat lungs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999;157(3):178–91.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    De Boeck M et al. In vivo genotoxicity of hard metal dust: induction of micronuclei in rat type II epithelial lung cells. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24(11):1793–800.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Coates Jr EO, Watson JH. Diffuse interstitial lung disease in tungsten carbide workers. Ann Intern Med. 1971;75(5):709–16.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Naqvi AH et al. Pathologic spectrum and lung dust burden in giant cell interstitial pneumonia (hard metal disease/cobalt pneumonitis): review of 100 cases. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2008;63(2):51–70.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Figueroa S et al. Hard metal interstitial pulmonary disease associated with a form of welding in a metal parts coating plant. Am J Ind Med. 1992;21(3):363–73.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moulin JJ et al. Lung cancer risk in hard-metal workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(3):241–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wild P et al. Lung cancer mortality in a site producing hard metals. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(8):568–73.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Richter VVRM. On hardness and toughness of ultrafine and nanocrystalline hard materials. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 1999;17(1-3):141–52.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Machado BI et al. Characterization and cytotoxic assessment of ballistic aerosol particulates for tungsten alloy penetrators into steel target plates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(9):3313–31.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheppard PR et al. Temporal variability of tungsten and cobalt in Fallon, Nevada. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(5):715–9.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abraham JL, Hunt A. Environmental contamination by cobalt in the vicinity of a cemented tungsten carbide tool grinding plant. Environ Res. 1995;69(1):67–74.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xu S et al. Tungsten- and cobalt-dominated heavy metal contamination of mangrove sediments in Shenzhen. China Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;100(1):562–6.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pang Y et al. Metal mixtures in urban and rural populations in the US: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Strong Heart Study. Environ Res. 2016;147:356–64.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    NIOSH, Occupational exposure to tungsten and cemented carbide. 1977. pp. 21–171.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bachthaler M et al. Corrosion of tungsten coils after peripheral vascular embolization therapy: influence on outcome and tungsten load. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;62(3):380–4.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Barrett J et al. Endovascular embolization of varicoceles: resorption of tungsten coils in the spermatic vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23(6):457–9.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Barbera A et al. Tungstate is an effective antidiabetic agent in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: a long-term study. Diabetologia. 2001;44(4):507–13.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Claret M et al. Tungstate decreases weight gain and adiposity in obese rats through increased thermogenesis and lipid oxidation. Endocrinology. 2005;146(10):4362–9.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hanzu F et al. Proof-of-concept trial on the efficacy of sodium tungstate in human obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12(11):1013–8.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Clausen JLTS, Larson SL, Bednar AJ, Ketterer M, Griggs CS, Lambert DJ, Hewitt AD, Ramsey CA, Bigl SR, Bailey, RN, Perron NM. Fate and transport of tungsten at Camp Edwards Small Arms Ranges. 2007.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sadiq MMAA, Althagafi KM. Inter-city comparison of metals in scalp hair collected after the Gulf War 1991. J Environ Sci Health Part A. 1992;27(6):1415–31.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mamuro TMY, Mizohata Y. Activation analysis of polluted river water. Radioisotopes. 1971;20(3):111–6.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pang Y et al. Association of geography and ambient air pollution with urine metal concentrations in six US cities: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(3).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schell J, Pardus M. Tungsten and cobalt in Fallon, Nevada: association with childhood leukemia. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(5):A196–7. author reply A197.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Seiler RL, Stollenwrk KG, Garbarino JK. Factors controlling tungsten concentrations in ground water, Carson Desert, Nevada. Appl Geochem. 2005;20(2):423–41.Google Scholar
  60. 60.•
    Tyrrell J et al. High urinary tungsten concentration is associated with stroke in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e77546. This study investigated the association between urinary tungsten concentrations and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease or stroke using data from the NHANES database. They found a strong association between elevated urinary tungsten concentrations and increased prevalence of stroke.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Menke A, Guallar E, Cowie CC. Metals in urine and diabetes in U.S. adults. Diabetes. 2016;65(1):164–71.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Feng W et al. Association of urinary metal profiles with altered glucose levels and diabetes risk: a population-based study in China. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123742.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Navas-Acien A et al. Metals in urine and peripheral arterial disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(2):164–9.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Massachusetts “Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)., Fact sheet: tungsten and tungsten compounds. 2006.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sanitary rules and norms of Russian Federation. 1996: Moscow.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    CDC, Second national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals, in HSDHHS, CDC, National Center for Environmental Health. 2003.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Canada H. Second report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada. 2013.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Paschal DC et al. Trace metals in urine of United States residents: reference range concentrations. Environ Res. 1998;76(1):53–9.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration, O., Tungsten and cobalt in workplace atmospheres (ICP Analysis). 2013. www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/inorganice/id213/id213.html. Last Accessed: April 29th, 2016.
  70. 70.
    Lagarde F, Leroy M. Metabolism and toxicity of tungsten in humans and animals. Met Ions Biol Syst. 2002;39:741–59.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kaye SV. Distribution and retention of orally administered radiotungsten in the rat. Health Phys. 1968;15(5):399–417.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Guandalini GS et al. Tissue distribution of tungsten in mice following oral exposure to sodium tungstate. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24(4):488–93.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kelly AD et al. In vivo tungsten exposure alters B cell development and increases DNA damage in murine bone marrow. Toxicol Sci. 2013;131(2):434–46.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rajendran N et al. Toxicologic evaluation of tungsten: 28-day inhalation study of tungsten blue oxide in rats. Inhal Toxicol. 2012;24(14):985–94.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Leggett RW. A model of the distribution and retention of tungsten in the human body. Sci Total Environ. 1997;206(2-3):147–65.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bolt AM et al. Tungsten promotes sex-specific adipogenesis in the bone by altering differentiation of bone marrow-resident mesenchymal stromal cells. Toxicol Sci. 2016.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ferguson VL et al. Bone development and age-related bone loss in male C57BL/6J mice. Bone. 2003;33(3):387–98.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Osterburg AR et al. Sodium tungstate (Na2WO4) exposure increases apoptosis in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Immunotoxicol. 2010;7(3):174–82.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fastje CD et al. Exposure to sodium tungstate and Respiratory Syncytial Virus results in hematological/immunological disease in C57BL/6J mice. Chem Biol Interact. 2012;196(3):89–95.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Frawley RP et al. Immunotoxic effects of sodium tungstate dihydrate on female BCF/N mice when administered in drinking water. J Immunotoxicol. 2016; 1–10.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Guilbert C et al. Exposure to tungsten induces DNA damage and apoptosis in developing B lymphocytes. Leukemia. 2011;25(12):1900–4.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Dunnick KM et al. The effect of tungstate nanoparticles on reactive oxygen species and cytotoxicity in raw 264.7 mouse monocyte macrophage cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2014;77(20):1251–68.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Mazus B, Krysiak C, Buchowicz J. Tungsten particle-induced nicking of supercoiled plasmid DNA. Plasmid. 2000;44(1):89–93.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ulitzur S, Barak M. Detection of genotoxicity of metallic compounds by the bacterial bioluminescence test. J Biolumin Chemilumin. 1988;2(2):95–9.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Singh I. Induction of reverse mutation and mitotic gene conversion by some metal compounds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1983;117(1-2):149–52.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sora S et al. Disomic and diploid meiotic products induced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the salts of 27 elements. Mutagenesis. 1986;1(1):21–8.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Miller AC, Page N. Mutagenicity of heavy metals used in military application: comparison of depleted uranium, tungsten, and nickel. Environ Mutagen. 1999. 141.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Laulicht F et al. Tungsten-induced carcinogenesis in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015;288(1):33–9.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Schroeder HA, Mitchener M. Life-term studies in rats: effects of aluminum, barium, beryllium, and tungsten. J Nutr. 1975;105(4):421–7.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wei HJ, Luo XM, Yang SP. Effects of molybdenum and tungsten on mammary carcinogenesis in SD rats. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;74(2):469–73.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Luo XM, Wei HJ, Yang SP. Inhibitory effects of molybdenum on esophageal and forestomach carcinogenesis in rats. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983;71(1):75–80.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Gunnison AF et al. The effect of inhaled sulfur dioxide and systemic sulfite on the induction of lung carcinoma in rats by benzo[a]pyrene. Environ Res. 1988;46(1):59–73.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tellez-Plaza M et al. Association of global DNA methylation and global DNA hydroxymethylation with metals and other exposures in human blood DNA samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(9):946–54.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Johnson JL, Rajagopalan KV, Cohen HJ. Molecular basis of the biological function of molybdenum. effect of tungsten on xanthine oxidase and sulfite oxidase in the rat. J Biol Chem. 1974;249(3):859–66.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Johnson DR et al. Tungsten effects on phosphate-dependent biochemical pathways are species and liver cell line dependent. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116(2):523–32.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Salto R et al. Activation of ERK by sodium tungstate induces protein synthesis and prevents protein degradation in rat L6 myotubes. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(14):2246–54.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Raza R et al. Polyoxometalates as potent and selective inhibitors of alkaline phosphatases with profound anticancer and amoebicidal activities. Dalton Trans. 2012;41(47):14329–36.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Rodriguez-Hernandez CJ et al. Sodium tungstate modulates ATM function upon DNA damage. FEBS Lett. 2013;587(10):1579–86.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Fernandez-Ruiz R et al. Role of sodium tungstate as a potential antiplatelet agent. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2015;9:2777–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Department of OncologyMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations