Advertisement

Thermal cracking simulation of functionally graded materials using the combined finite–discrete element method

  • Lei SunEmail author
  • Giovanni Grasselli
  • Quansheng Liu
  • Xuhai Tang
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The functionally graded materials (FGMs), characterized by spatially varying material properties, have been used in a wide range of engineering applications (i.e., aerospace, nuclear reactor and microelectronics) in high temperature and high-temperature gradient environments. The prediction of crack behavior under severe temperature conditions is essential for the safety and long-term service life of such critical components. In this paper, a novel thermal–mechanical coupling model for FGMs is proposed, which consists of a thermal part for the temperature field computation and the combined finite–discrete element method part for the crack evolution modeling. The spatially dependent material characteristics of the FGMs are captured in this model, together with typical property variation functions (quadratic, exponential and trigonometric). The accuracy and robustness of the proposed coupled TM model are validated by numerical tests. Then, this model is applied to investigate the thermal cracking process in FGMs under different kinds of thermal loads. The influence of the crack interaction on crack growth pattern is also discussed. The results show that the proposed method is useful to the fracture mechanics analysis and design of the FGMs structures.

Keywords

Functionally graded materials (FGMs) Thermal–mechanical coupling problem Thermal cracking Crack interaction Combined finite–discrete element method (FDEM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC1501300), NSERC/Energi Simulation Industrial Research Chair program and Ph.D. Short-time Mobility Program of Wuhan University. The authors would like to thank Prof. Munjiza for the use of the Y code. The proposed Y-FGM™ is based on the Y code. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Koizumi M (1997) FGM activities in Japan. Composites 28:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birman V (2007) Modeling and analysis of functionally graded materials and structures. Appl Mech Rev 60(5):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shukla A, Jain N, Chona R (2007) A review of dynamic fracture studies in functionally graded materials. Strain 43(2):76–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clémence Petit, Palmero P (2018) Functionally graded ceramics for biomedical application: concept, manufacturing, properties. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 15:820–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corni I, Ryan MP, Boccaccini AR (2008) Electrophoretic deposition: from traditional ceramics to nanotechnology. J Eur Ceram Soc 28(7):1353–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babaei MH, Chen Z (2015) Transient hyperbolic heat conduction in a functionally graded hollow cylinder. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 24(2):325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim Jeong-Ho, Paulino G (2007) On fracture criteria for mixed-mode crack propagation in functionally graded materials. Mech Compos Mater Struct 14(4):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zamani A, Eslami MR (2009) Coupled dynamical thermoelasticity of a functionally graded cracked layer. J Therm Stresses 32(10):969–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang ZW, Zhang Q, Xia LZ, Wu JT, Liu PQ (2015) Stress analysis and parameter optimization of an fgm pressure vessel subjected to thermo-mechanical loadings. Proc Eng 130:374–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noda N, Wang BL (2002) Transient thermoelastic responses of functionally graded materials containing collinear cracks. Eng Fract Mech 69(14–16):1791–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo LC, Noda NWuL (2008) Thermal fracture model for a functionally graded plate with a crack normal to the surfaces and arbitrary thermomechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 68(3–4):1034–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrova V, Schmauder S (2012) Interaction of a system of cracks with an interface crack in functionally graded/homogeneous bimaterials under thermo-mechanical loading. Comput Mater Sci 64(64):229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eshraghi I, Soltani N, Dag N (2018) Hyperbolic heat conduction based weight function method for thermal fracture of functionally graded hollow cylinders. Int J Press Vessels Pip 165:249–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawasaki A, Watanabe R (2002) Thermal fracture behavior of metal/ceramic functionally graded materials. Eng Fract Mech 69(14–16):1713–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abanto-Bueno J, Lambros J (2006) An experimental study of mixed mode crack initiation and growth in functionally graded materials. Exp Mech 46(2):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qin LY, Wang W, Yang G (2012) Experimental study on laser metal deposition of fgms with ultrasonic vibration. Appl Mech Mater 5:271–272Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilbert A, Kokini K, Sankarasubramanian S (2008) Thermal fracture of zirconia-mullite composite thermal barrier coatings under thermal shock: an experimental study. Surf Coat Technol 10(202):2152–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burlayenko VN, Altenbach H, Sadowski T, Dimitrova SD (2016) Computational simulations of thermal shock cracking by the virtual crack closure technique in a functionally graded plate. Comput Mater Sci 116:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaghaghi MA, Marco A (2018) Thermoelastic analysis of surface cracks in fgms hollow cylinders using the interaction energy integral method. Eng Fract Mech 202:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ekhlakov A, Khay O, Zhang C, Sladek J, Sladek V, Gao XW (2012) Thermoelastic crack analysis in functionally graded materials and structures by a bem. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 35:724–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang BJ, Yang Y, Gao XW, Zhang C (2018) Dynamic fracture analysis of functionally graded materials under thermal shock loading by using the radial integration boundary element method. Compos Struct 201:468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu P, Yu T, Bui TQ, Zhang C, Xu Y, Lim CW (2014) Transient thermal shock fracture analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric materials by the extended finite element method. Int J Solids Struct 51(11–12):2167–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rokhi MM, Shariati M (2013) Implementation of the extended finite element method for coupled dynamic thermoelastic fracture of a functionally graded cracked layer. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 35(2):69–81CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang HH, Liu SM, Han SY, Fan LF (2018) Modeling of 2d cracked FGMs under thermo-mechanical loadings with the numerical manifold method. Int J Mech Sci 148:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munjiza A (2004) The combined finite–discrete element method. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lisjak A, Mahabadi O, He L, Tatone B, Kaifosh P et al (2018) Acceleration of a 2D/3D finite–discrete element code for geomechanical simulations using general purpose GPU computing. Comput Geotech 100:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lei Q, Latham JP, Xiang J (2016) Implementation of an empirical joint constitutive model into finite–discrete element analysis of the geomechanical behaviour of fractured rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4799–4816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan CZ, Zheng H, Sun GH, Ge XR (2016) Combined finite–discrete element method for simulation of hydraulic fracturing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1389–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu QS, Sun L (2019) Simulation of coupled hydro-mechanical interactions during grouting process in fractured media based on the combined finite–discrete element method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 84:472–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Munjiza A, Andrews KRF, White JK (1999) Combined single and smeared crack model in combined finite–discrete element analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 44(1):41–57CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Munjiza A, Andrews KRF (1998) NBS contact detection algorithm for bodies of similar size. Int J Numer Meth Eng 43(1):131–149CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lisjak A, Grasselli G, Vietor T (2014) Continuum-discontinuum analysis of failure mechanisms around unsupported circular excavations in anisotropic clay shales. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:96–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sutradhar A, Paulino GH (2004) The simple boundary element method for transient heat conduction in functionally graded materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(42–44):4511–4539CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cao LL, Qin QH, Zhao N (2012) Hybrid graded element model for transient heat conduction in functionally graded materials. Acta Mech Sin (English Series) 28(1):128–139CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Takeuti Y, Furukawa T (1981) Some considerations on thermal shock problems in a plate. J Appl Mech 48(1):113CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jiao YY, Zhang XL, Zhang HH, Li HB, Yang SQ, Li JC (2015) A coupled thermo-mechanical discontinuum model for simulating rock cracking induced by temperature stresses. Comput Geotech 67:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Farouki OT (1981) The thermal properties of soils in cold regions. Cold Reg Sci Technol 5(1):67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shen B, Stephansson O, Rinne M (2014) Modelling rock fracturing processes. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tan X, Chen W, Wu G, Yang J (2013) Numerical simulations of heat transfer with ice–water phase change occurring in porous media and application to a cold-region tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yvonnet J, He QC, Zhu QZ, Shao JF (2011) A general and efficient computational procedure for modelling the kapitza thermal resistance based on xfem. Comput Mater Sci 50(4):1220–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jung J, Do BC, Yang QD (2016) Augmented finite–element method for arbitrary cracking and crack interaction in solids under thermo-mechanical loadings. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 374(2071):20150282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hattiangadi A, Siegmund T (2005) A numerical study on interface crack growth under heat flux loading. Int J Solids Struct 42(24–25):6335–6355CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    He J, Liu QS, Wu ZJ, Xu XY (2018) Modelling transient heat conduction of granular materials by numerical manifold method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 86:45–55CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2005) Code UDEC. User’s Guide, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iesan D (2004) Thermoelastic models of continua. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 414Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sladek J, Sladek V, Zhang C (2003) Transient heat conduction analysis in functionally graded materials by the meshless local boundary integral equation method. Comput Mater Sci 28(3–4):494–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang BL, Tian ZH (2005) Application of finite element–finite difference method to the determination of transient temperature field in functionally graded materials. Finite Elem Anal Des 41(4):335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Feng YT, Han K, Owen DRJ (2009) Discrete thermal element modelling of heat conduction in particle systems: pipe-network model and transient analysis. Powder Technol 193(3):248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fujimoto T, Noda N (2001) Influence of the compositional profile of functionally graded material on the crack path under thermal shock. J Am Ceram Soc 84(7):1480–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zamani A, Eslami MR (2010) Implementation of the extended finite element method for dynamic thermoelastic fracture initiation. Int J Solids Struct 47(10):1392–1404CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kawasaki A, Watanabe R (1997) Effect of gradient microstructure on thermal shock crack extension in metal/ceramic functionally graded materials. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on functionally graded materials, pp 143–148Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Huang H, Meakin P, Malthe-Sorenssen A (2016) Physics-based simulation of multiple interacting crack growth in brittle rocks driven by thermal cooling. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40:2163–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cheng F (2013) Analysis of fracture behavior of metal/ceramic functionally graded materials under thermal stress. Adv Mater Res 750–752:2200–2205Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bahr HA, Fischer G, Weiss HJ (1986) Thermal-shock crack patterns explained by single and multiple crack propagation. J Mater Sci 21(8):2716–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bahr HA, Weiss Hans-Jürgen, Bahr U, Hofmann M, Fischer G, Lampenscherf S et al (2010) Scaling behavior of thermal shock crack patterns and tunneling cracks driven by cooling or drying. J Mech Phys Solids 58(9):1411–1421CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© OWZ 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations