Advertisement

Effect of rock shape representation in DEM on flow and energy utilisation in a pilot SAG mill

  • Paul W. ClearyEmail author
Article

Abstract

The impact of the shape representation used for rock particles in a DEM model of a SAG mill on charge dynamics and energy utilisation is investigated. A 1.8-m diameter pilot scale SAG mill which includes realistic end walls and a discharge grate is used. This size of mill is used for scale-up and design processes for industrial SAG mills so understanding the effect of approximating the particles as being spherical or non-round is important. The cataracting component of the flow is found to be insensitive to the particle shape used in the model but the cascading part of the flow is moderately sensitive with the shoulder moving slightly higher, the bulk toe moving closer into the charge and the centre of circulation moving more strongly higher. The end walls are found to have a strong effect on the flow dominating the dynamics in the outmost parts of the charge and strengthening the particle microstructure via the axial compression induced by the transfer of the weight of the charge to the end walls. The cataracting stream consists of coherent bands of predominantly finer material being thrown on ballistic trajectories. Its form is a superposition of one component formed by the flow from the belly lifters and a second from the flow along the radial end wall lifters. The net power draw is found to increase slightly, but larger changes in the pattern of energy usage within the mill are identified. Rock shape has a significantly stronger impact on the large size classes in the charge and leads to strong migration of energy usage from the finer material to the coarser and from the rock fractions to the media.

Keywords

DEM SAG mill Particle shape Super-quadric Charge motion Energy utilisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Matt Sinnott and Phil Owen for their assistance with the flow visualisation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that no conflict of interest exists.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Informed consent

No individual participants were included in the study so there are no subjects for informed consent requirements.

References

  1. 1.
    Carvalho RM, Tavares LM (2011) Leaping forward in SAG and AG mill simulation using a mechanistic model framework. In: SAG2011 conference, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleary PW (1998) Predicting charge motion, power draw, segregation, wear and particle breakage in ball mills using discrete element methods. Miner Eng 11:1061–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cleary PW (2001) Charge behaviour and power consumption in ball mills: sensitivity to mill operating conditions, liner geometry and charge composition. Int J Miner Process 63:79–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleary PW (2001) Recent advances in DEM modelling of tumbling mills’. Miner Eng 14:1295–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleary PW (2001) Modelling comminution devices using DEM. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 25:83–105CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cleary PW (2004) Large scale industrial DEM modelling. Eng Comput 21:169–204CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cleary PW (2006) Axial transport in dry ball mills. App Math Model 30:1343–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cleary PW (2008) The effect of particle shape on simple shear flows. Powder Tech 179:144–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cleary PW (2009) Industrial particle flow modelling using DEM. Eng Comput 26(6):698–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cleary PW (2015) A multiscale method for including fine particle effects in DEM models of grinding mills. Miner Eng 84:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cleary PW, Morrison RD (2012) Prediction of 3D slurry flow within the grinding chamber and discharge from a pilot scale SAG mill. Miner Eng 39:184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleary PW, Morrison RD (2016) Comminution mechanisms, particle shape evolution and collision energy partitioning in tumbling mills. Miner Eng 86:75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cleary PW, Owen PJ (2018) Development of models relating charge shape and power draw to SAG mill operating parameters and their use in devising mill operating strategies to account for liner wear. Miner Eng 117:42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cleary PW, Owen P (2019) Effect of particle shape on charge structure and collision environment in an industrial scale SAG mill. Miner Eng 132:48–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cleary PW, Owen PJ (2019) Effect of operating condition changes on the collisional environment in a SAG mill. Miner Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.06.027 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cleary PW, Sawley ML (2002) DEM modelling of industrialgranular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge. App Math Modelling 26:89–111CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cleary PW, Morrison R, Morrell S (2003) Comparison of DEM and experiment for a scale model SAG mill. Int J Miner Process 68:129–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cleary PW, Sinnott MD, Morrison RD (2008) DEM prediction ofparticle flows in grinding processes. Int J Num Methods Fluids 58:319–353CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Delaney GW, Cleary PW, Morrison RD, Cummins S, Loveday B (2013) Predicting breakage and the evolution of rock size and shape distributions in AG and SAG mills using DEM. Miner Eng 50–51:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Djordevic N (2003) Discrete element modelling of the influence of lifters on power draw of tumbling mills. Miner Eng 16:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Djordjevic N, Morrison R, Loveday B, Cleary PW (2006) Modelling comminution patterns within a pilot scale AG/SAG mill. Miner Eng 19:1505–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Govendar I, Cleary PW, Mainza A (2013) Comparisons of PEPT derived charge features in wet milling environments with a friction-adjusted DEM model. Chem Eng Sci 97:162–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Govender N, Wilke DN, Kok S (2016) Blaze-DEMGPU: modular high performance DEM framework for the GPU architecture. SoftwareX 5:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herbst JA, Nordell L (2001) Optimization of the design of sag mill internals using high fidelity simulation. In: Barratt DJ, Allan MJ, Mular AL (eds) Proc. of the SAG conference, IV, pp 150–164Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hlungwani O, Rikhotso J, Dong H, Moyes MH (2003) Further validation of DEM modelling of milling effects of liner profile and mill speed. Miner Eng 16:993–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hopkins MA, Hibler WD, Flato GM (1991) On the numerical simulation of the sea ice ridging process. J Geophys Res C3:4809–4820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kalala JT, Bwalya MM, Moys MH (2005) Discrete element method (DEM) modelling of evolving mill liner profiles due to wear. Part I. DEM validation. Miner Eng 18:1386–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kalala JT, Bwalya MM, Moys MH (2005) Discrete element method (DEM) modelling of evolving mill liner profiles due to wear. Part II. Industrial case study. Miner Eng 18:1392–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mishra BK, Rajamani RJ (1992) The discrete element method for the simulation of ball mills. Appl Math Model 16:598–604CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mishra BK, Rajamani RK (1994) Simulation of charge motion in ball mills. Part 1: experimental verifications. Int J Miner Process 40:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morrison R, Cleary PW (2004) Using DEM to model ore breakage within a pilot scale sag mill. Miner Eng 17:1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morrison RD, Cleary PW (2008) Towards a virtual comminution machine. Miner Eng 21:770–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Munjiza A, Latham JP, John NWM (2003) 3D dynamics of discrete element systems comprising irregular discrete elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56:35–55CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Owen P, Cleary PW (2015) The relationship between charge shape characteristics and fill level and lifter height for a SAG mill. Miner Eng 83:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Owen PJ, Cleary PW (2016) Understanding performance variation of a HICOM® mill with operating conditions and media attributes. Int J Miner Process 155:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Potapov AV, Campbell CS (1996) A three dimensional simulation of brittle solid fracture. Int J Mod Phys C 7:717–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Powell MS, Nurick GN (1996) Study of charge motion in rotary mills. Part 1—extension of the theory. Miner Eng 9:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Powell MS, McBride AT (2004) A three-dimensional analysis of media motion and grinding regions in mills. Miner Eng 17:1099–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Powell MS, Smit I, Radziszewski P, Cleary P, Rattray B, Eriksson K, Schaeffer L (2006) The selection and design of mill liners. In: Kawatra SK (ed) Advances in comminution. Society for Mining, metallurgy, and exploration, Inc., Colorado, pp 331–376. ISBN-13: 978-0-87335-246-8Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Powell MS, Weerasekara NS, Cole S, LaRoche RD, Favier J (2011) DEM modelling of liner evolution and its influence on grinding rate in ball mills. Miner Eng 24:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rajamani RK, Mishra BK (1996) Dynamics of ball and rock charge in SAG mills. In: Proc. SAG 1996. University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rothenburg L, Bathurst RJ (1991) Numerical simulation of idealised granular assemblies with plane elliptical particles. Comput Geotech 11:315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tavares LM (2017) A review of advanced ball mill modelling. KONA Powder Particle J 34:106–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thornton C, Cummins S, Cleary PW (2013) An investigation of the comparative behaviour of alternative contact force models during inelastic collisions. Powder Technol 233:30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weerasekara NS, Powell MS, Cleary PW, Tavares LM, Evertsson M, Morrison RD, Quist J, Carvalho RM (2013) The contribution of DEM to the science of comminution. Powder Technol 248:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Williams JR, Pentland A (1992) Super-quadrics and modal dynamics for discrete elements in interactive design. Int J Comput Aided Eng Comput 9:115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© OWZ 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Data61Clayton SouthAustralia

Personalised recommendations