Advertisement

About the nuclear particles’ structure and dimensions

  • Florian Ion T. Petrescu
Article

Abstract

To better understand the structure of matter, it is not enough to study atoms and molecules. For living matter, it is necessary to study the cell, including the mitochondrial, and for matter in general, it is necessary to determine the elemental elements of the atom, and further those of the nucleus, how the nucleons bind to each other, forming virtually new atomic structures if they have electrons, or new ionic structures if they suffer a lack of electrons. The present study aims to present in an original vision the structure of the nuclear particles and their dimensions, with the possibility of their dynamic determination, depending on the energy of the respective moving particles. The basic idea of the theoretical study is that an elementary particle in motion changes its dimensions according to its linear displacement velocity. The originality of the study consists in using the total kinetic energy of a moving mechanical particle, the energy constituted by the sum of kinetic energy at translation and that of the kinetic energy of rotation around a particle’s own axis. The most important application of the theory presented is the determination of the dimensions and structure of the elementary nuclear particles in order to understand the nuclear phenomena of the nucleus and of the nuclei particles of an atom.

Keywords

Elementary particle Structure Dimensions Nuclear energy 

List of symbols

ε0

The permissive constant (the permittivity): ε0 = 8.85418E−12 (C2/Nm2)

h

The Planck constant: h = 6.626E−34 (Js)

q

Electrical elementary load: qe = − 1.6021E−19 (C) qp = + 1.6021E−19 (C)

c

The light speed in vacuum: c = 2.997925 (m/s)

m0 (kg)

The rest mass of one particle

m0electron

9.11E−31 (kg)

m0proton

1.672621898(21)E−27 (kg)

m0neutron

1.674927471(21)E−27 (kg)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges INIS for his research in the field.

Funding

This study was not yet funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

(On behalf of all authors), the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest, and the work is in compliance with ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Halliday D, Robert R (1966) Physics, Part II, 1st edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petrescu FIT, Calautit JK (2016) About nano fusion and dynamic fusion. Am J Appl Sci 13:261–266.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.261.266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petrescu FIT, Calautit JK (2016) About the light dimensions. Am J Appl Sci 13:321–325.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.321.325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrescu FIT, Apicella A, Petrescu RV, Kozaitis S, Bucinell R et al (2016) Environmental protection through nuclear energy. Am J Appl Sci 13:941–946.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.941.946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrescu FIT (2014) Nuclear fusion. Infinite Energy 20(1):44–47Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petrescu FIT (2012) Cold nuclear fusion. Plasma Physics and Fusion Technology (S70), INIS 44(16)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petrescu FIT (2012) Cold nuclear fusion. Create Space Publisher, USA (English version). ISBN 978-1-4782-3426-5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petrescu RV, Aversa R, Apicella A, Li S, Chen G, Mirsayar MM, Petrescu FIT (2016) Something about electron dimension. Am J Appl Sci 13(11):1272–1276.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.1272.1276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petrescu RV, Aversa R, Li S, Mirsayar MM, Bucinell R, Kosaitis S, Abu-Lebdeh T, Apicella A, Petrescu FIT (2017) Electron dimensions. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10(2):584–602.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.584.602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrescu RV, Aversa R, Kozaitis S, Apicella A, Petrescu FIT (2017) Deuteron dimensions. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10(3):649–654.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.649.654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrescu RV, Aversa R, Kozaitis S, Apicella A, Petrescu FIT (2017) Some proposed solutions to achieve nuclear fusion. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10(3):703–708.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.703.708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrescu RV, Aversa R, Kozaitis S, Apicella A, Petrescu FIT (2017) Some basic reactions in nuclear fusion. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10(3):709–716.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2017.709.716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petrescu FIT, Petrescu RV (2014) Nuclear green energy. IJAP 10(1):3–14Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kramer D (2011) DOE looks again at inertial fusion as a potential clean-energy source. Phys Today 64:26.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3563814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moses EI, Boyd RN, Remington BA, Keane CJ, Al-Ayat R (2009) The national ignition facility: ushering in a new age for high energy density science. Phys Plasmas 16:041006.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3116505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shultis JK, Faw RE (2002) Fundamentals of nuclear science and engineering. CRC Press, New York. ISBN 0824708342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krane KS (1987) Introductory nuclear physics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York. ISBN 047180553XGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© OWZ 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bucharest Polytechnic UniversityBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations