Advertisement

Computational Particle Mechanics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 133–144 | Cite as

Modeling heat flow across material interfaces and cracks using the material point method

  • John A. Nairn
Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Heat conduction through an object with material interfaces or cracks is influenced by heat flow across those discontinuities. This paper presents a numerical particle method for modeling such heat flow coupled to computational mechanics all within the material point method (MPM). In brief, MPM models contacts and cracks by extrapolating multiple velocity fields to a grid. To model interfacial heat flow, MPM should similarly extrapolate multiple temperature fields. Interface nodes that “see” more than one temperature field modify their heat flow to reflect interfacial physics. For example, interfaces in contact may transfer heat by perfect conduction, while separated interfaces may block heat flow or cause reduced heat flow by convection. After some validation examples, two real-world examples consider cooling an ingot within a crucible where cooling causes the ingot to lose contact with the crucible walls and thermal imaging of cracks within an opaque solid.

Keywords

Heat conduction Material point method Explicit cracks Material contact 

Notes

Funding

This work was made possible by the endowment for the Richardson Chair in Wood Science and Forest Products. The author also thanks Rigel Woodside, Paul King, and Kevin Gartner for helpful discussions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that he has no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Almond DP, Peng W (2001) Thermal imaging of composites. J Microsc 201(2):163–170MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bardenhagen SG, Guilkey JE, Roessig KM, Brackbill JU, Witzel WM, Foster JC (2001) An improved contact algorithm for the material point method and application to stress propagation in granular material. Comput Model Eng Sci 2:509–522zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardenhagen SG, Kober EM (2004) The generalized interpolation material point method. Comput Model Eng Sci 5:477–496Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brackbill J, Kothe D, Ruppel H (1988) FLIP: a low-dissipation, particle-in-cell method for fluid flow. Comput Phys Commun 48(1):25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlson DE (1984) Linear thermoelasticity. In: Truesdell C (ed) Mechanics of solids, vol II. Springer, New York, pp 297–345Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guenther RB, Lee JW (1996) Partial differential equations of mathematical physics and integral equations. Dover Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lemiale V, Hurmane A, Nairn JA (2010) Material point method simulation of equal channel angular pressing involving large plastic strain and contact through sharp corners. Comput Model Eng Sci 70(1):41–66Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maurer GE (1989) Primary and secondary melt processing–superalloys. In: Tien JK, Caulfield T (eds) Superalloys, supercomposites and superceramics. Academic Press, New York, pp 49–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nairn JA (2003) Material point method calculations with explicit cracks. Comput Model Eng Sci 4:649–664zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nairn JA (2007) Numerical implementation of imperfect interfaces. Comput Mater Sci 40:525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nairn JA (2013) Modeling of imperfect interfaces in the material point method using multimaterial methods. Comput Model Eng Sci 92(3):271–299MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nairn JA (2017) Material point method (NairnMPM) and finite element analysis (NairnFEA) open-source software. http://osupdocs.forestry.oregonstate.edu
  13. 13.
    Nairn JA, Aimene Y (2017) Modeling interacting and propagating cracks in the material point method: Application to simulation of hydraulic fractures interacting with natural fractures. In preparationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nairn JA, Bardenhagen SG, Smith GS (2018) Generalized contact and improved frictional heating in the material point method. Comput Part Mech 5(3):285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nairn JA, Guilkey JE (2015) Axisymmetric form of the generalized interpolation material point method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 101:127–147MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sulsky D, Chen Z, Schreyer HL (1994) A particle method for history-dependent materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 118:179–186MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Oñate Wriggers Zohdi (OWZ) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oregon State University, Wood Science & EngineeringCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations