pp 1–17 | Cite as

An experimental methodology for the concurrent characterization of multiple parameters influencing nanoscale friction

  • Marko Perčić
  • Saša ZelenikaEmail author
  • Igor Mezić
  • Robert Peter
  • Nikša Krstulović
Open Access
Research Article


A structured transdisciplinary method for the experimental determination of friction in the nanometric domain is proposed in this paper. The dependence of nanoscale friction on multiple process parameters on these scales, which comprise normal forces, sliding velocities, and temperature, was studied via the lateral force microscopy approach. The procedure used to characterize the stiffness of the probes used, and especially the influence of adhesion on the obtained results, is thoroughly described. The analyzed thin films were obtained by using either atomic layer or pulsed laser deposition. The developed methodology, based on elaborated design of experiments algorithms, was successfully implemented to concurrently characterize the dependence of nanoscale friction in the multidimensional space defined by the considered process parameters. This enables the establishment of a novel methodology that extends the current state-of-the-art of nanotribological studies, as it allows not only the gathering of experimental data, but also the ability to do so systematically and concurrently for several influencing variables at once. This, in turn, creates the basis for determining generalizing correlations of the value of nanoscale friction in any multidimensional experimental space. These developments create the preconditions to eventually extend the available macro- and mesoscale friction models to a true multiscale model that will considerably improve the design, modelling and production of MEMS devices, as well as all precision positioning systems aimed at micro- and nanometric accuracy and precision.


nanoscale friction lateral force microscopy experimental determination methodology multivariate space contact mechanics 



The work described in this paper is enabled by using the equipment funded via the ERDF project RC.2.2.06-0001 “Research Infrastructure for Campus-based Laboratories at the University of Rijeka — RISK”, as well as via the support of the University of Rijeka grants uniri-tehnic-18-32 “Advanced mechatronics devices for smart technological solutions” and 4581 “Measuring, modelling and compensating friction in high-precision devices: From macro- to nanometric scale”. The work was partially supported also by the Croatian Science Foundation project IP-11-2013-2753 “Laser Cold Plasma Interaction and Diagnostics”. The GoSumD software is provided by AIMdyn, Inc.


  1. [1]
    Bhushan B. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Marques F, Flores P, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M. A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 86(3): 1407–1443 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mekid S. Precision design aspects for friction actuation with error compensation. J Mech Sci Technol 23(11): 2873–2884 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Al-Bender F, Lampaert V, Swevers J. Modeling of dry sliding friction dynamics: From heuristic models to physically motivated models and back. Chaos 14(2): 446—460 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kamenar E, Zelenika S. Issues in validation of pre-sliding friction models for ultra-high precision positioning. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 233(3): 997–1006 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Piatkowski T. GMS friction model approximation. Mech Mach Theory 75: 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Yoon J Y, Trumper D L. Friction modeling, identification, and compensation based on friction hysteresis and Dahl resonance. Mechatronics 24(6): 734–741 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kamenar E, Zelenika S. Nanometric positioning accuracy in the presence of presliding and sliding friction: Modelling, identification and compensation. Mech Based Des Struc Mach 45(1): 111–126 (2017Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Liu Y F, Li J, Zhang Z M, Hu X H, Zhang W J. Experimental comparison of five friction models on the same test-bed of the micro stick-slip motion system. Mech Sci 6(1): 15–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Mate C M. Tribology on the Small Scale: A Bottom Up Approach to Friction, Lubrication, and Wear. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    De Moerlooze K, Al-Bender F. On the relationship between normal load and friction force in pre-sliding frictional contacts. Part 2: Experimental investigation. Wear 269(3–4): 183–189 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Krylov S Y, Frenken J W M. The crucial role of temperature in atomic scale friction. J Phys Condens Mat 20(35): 354003 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yu J X, Hu H L, Jia F, Yuan W F, Zang H B, Cai Y, Ji F. Quantitative investigation on single-asperity friction and wear of phosphate laser glass against a spherical AFM diamond tip. Tribol Int 81: 43–52 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zelenika S. Analytical and experimental characterization of ball-groove contact problems. In Proceedings of the 3 rd DAAAM International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Developing Countries, Split, Croatia, 2004: 75–80.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Manini N, Mistura G, Paolicelli G, Tosatti E, Vanossi A. Current trends in the physics of nanoscale friction. Adv Phys 2(3): 569–590 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    University of Rijeka, Croatia. Equipment of the centre for micro- and nanosciences and technologies.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    University of Rijeka, Croatia. Centre for micro- and nanosciences and technologies., 2018.
  18. [18]
    Simonovic K, Kalin M. Methodology of a statistical and DOE approach to the prediction of performance in tribology—A DLC boundary-lubrication case study. Tribol Int 101: 10–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hinkelmann K, Kempthorne O. Design and Analysis of Experiments—Vol. 1: Introduction to Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Hoboken (Belgium): John Wiley & Sons, 2008.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Alam F M, McNaught K R, Ringrose T J. A comparison of experimental designs in the development of a neural networ metamodel. Simul Model Pract Theory 12(7–8): 559–578 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Du Q, Faber V, Gunzburger M. Centroidal voronoi tessellations: Applications and algorithms. SIAM Rev 41(4): 637–676 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kecman V. Learning and Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models. Cambridge (USA): MIT Press, 2001.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    AIMdyn System Analytics, Engineering Consulting and Software Development. GoSUMD software., 2018.
  24. [24]
    Perčić M, Zelenika S, Mezic I, Peter R, Krstulović N. Experimental approach to establishing a model of nanoscale friction. In Proceedings of the 18th EUSPEN International Conference, Cranfield, UK, 2018: 63–64.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Yang L, Hu J H, Xiao H P, Quan W W. Analysis of humidity-dependent adhesion between a probe tip and a surface. Particuology 33: 91–97 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Meljanac D, Juraic K, Plodinec M, Siketić Z, Gracin D, Krstulović N, Salamon K, Skenderović H, Kregar Z, Rakić I Š, et al. Influence of RF excitation during pulsed laser deposition in oxygen atmosphere on the structural properties and luminescence of nanocrystalline ZnO:Al thin films. J Vac Sci Technol A 34(2): 021514 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Wagner C D, Riggs W M, Davis L E, Moulder J F, Muilenberg G E. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Eden Prairie (USA): Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1979.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Payne B P, Biesinger M C, McIntyre N S. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of reactions on chromium metal and chromium oxide surfaces. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenomena 184(1–2): 29–37 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    Belikov S, Alexander J, Wall C, Yermolenko I, Magonov S, Malovichko I. Thermal tune method for AFM oscillatory resonant imaging in air and liquid. In Proceedings of 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, USA, 2014: 1009–1014.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Perčić M, Zelenika S, Kamenar E. Issues in validation of friction in the nanometric domain. In Proceedings of the 17th EUSPEN International Conference, Cranfield, UK, 2017: 105–106.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Sader J E. Parallel beam approximation for V-shaped atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum 66(9): 4583–4587 (1995Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Zhang X R, Fisher T S, Raman A, Sands T D. Linear coefficient of thermal expansion of porous anodic alumina thin films from atomic force microscopy. Nanosc Microsc Therm Eng 13(4): 243–252 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    MIKROMASCH. Test structures — TGF11 series., 2018.
  36. [36]
    Varenberg M, Etsion I, Halperin G. An improved wedge calibration method for lateral force in atomic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 74(7): 3362–3367 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    University of Trieste, Italy. Laboratorio MOSE., 2018.
  38. [38]
    D’Acunto M. Theoretical approach for the quantification of wear mechanisms on the nanoscale. Nanotechnology 15(7): 795–801 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Liu J J, Notbohm J K, Carpick R W, Turner K T. Method for characterizing nanoscale wear of atomic force microscope tips. ACS Nano 4(7): 3763–3772 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Bhushan B. Adhesion and stiction: Mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B 21(6): 2262 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    ×olak A, Wormeester H, Zandvliet H J W, Poelsema B. Surface adhesion and its dependence on surface roughness and humidity measured with a flat tip. Appl Surf Sci 258(18): 6938–6942 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Rabinovich Y I, Adler J J, Ata A, Singh R K, Moudgil B M. Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: II. Measurement and comparison with theory. J Colloid Interface Sci 232(1): 17–24 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Tranchida D, Piccarolo S, Deblieck R A C. Some experimental issues of AFM tip blind estimation: The effect of noise and resolution. Meas Sci Technol 17(10): 2630–2636 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Bruker. AFM Probes — RS titanium roughness sample., 2018.
  45. [45]
    Miller D C, Foster R R, Jen S H, Bertrand J A, Cunningham S J, Morris A S, Lee Y C, George S M, Dunn M L. Thermo-mechanical properties of alumina films created using the atomic layer deposition technique. Sensor Actuat A Phys 164(1–2): 58–67 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Mandel J. The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Dagdeviren O E. Exploring load, velocity, and surface disorder dependence of friction with one-dimensional and two-dimensional models. Nanotechnology 29(31): 315704 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Tambe N S, Bhushan B. Friction model for the velocity dependence of nanoscale friction. Nanotechnology 16(10): 2309–2324 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Perčić
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saša Zelenika
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Igor Mezić
    • 2
    • 3
  • Robert Peter
    • 2
    • 4
  • Nikša Krstulović
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia
  2. 2.Centre for Micro- and Nanosciences and TechnologiesUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUC Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Department of PhysicsUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia
  5. 5.Institute of PhysicsZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations