An Update on Fragrance Contact Dermatitis
- 7 Downloads
Fragrances are a group of substances present in many cosmetic products, which are one of the most common sources of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in Europe. Their widespread distribution, the presence of these substances as combinations, their ability to transform into more reactive substances, and the relatively recent regulations regarding these products are the main reasons for this high prevalence. In the last few years, advances on knowledge about haptens in fragrances have made possible to discover new allergens, to state that current fragrance markers are not enough to detect most of fragrance ACD cases and to know the products that should be patched and their concentrations. In this review, we revise the mechanisms of sensitization to allergens that are not represented in baseline series and the concentrations at which they should be used, which should be included in specific series and the usefulness of baseline and fragrance specific series.
Purpose of review
To revise the most recent advances in knowledge about fragrance contact dermatitis, especially about sensitization mechanisms and effectivity of fragrance markers in baseline series and fragrances in essential oils.
Fragrance allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common sources of ACD only preceded by nickel sulfate. Many studies have shown that fragrance mix (FM)I, FMII, and colophonium, fragrance markers in baseline series, are not enough to screen for cases of ACD to fragrances. Some fragrances use limonene and linalool hydroperoxides, which have shown a high prevalence of sensitization and have been proposed as new allergens to include in the European Baseline Series, while other fragrances like Evernia furfuracea, which have also shown a high prevalence of sensitization, will not be included. Essential oils are obtained by distillation process and are widely used. In some cases, their allergenic components are not known. Co-sensitization to other fragrance components is frequent and they should be patch tested if allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances or cosmetics is suspected.
A more extensive group of fragrance markers should be included in the European Baseline Series, with at least limonene and linalool hydroperoxides and Evernia furfuracea. The use of products containing fragrances is very common and people sensitized to one of these substances should be suspected of multiple co-sensitizations.
KeywordsAllergic contact dermatitis Fragrances Baseline series Haptens Fragrance mix Fragrance markers
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Luca Schneller-Pavelescu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gemma Ochando-Ibernón declares that she has no conflict of interest. Juan Francisco Silvestre-Salvador has received grants as advisor and speaker for Novartis.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 16.Smith C, Hotchkiss S. Enzymes and mechanisms of xenobiotic metabolism. In: allergic contact dermatitis chemical and metabolic mechanisms. London and New York, Taylor and Francis; 2001. p. 89–117.Google Scholar
- 18.Basketter DA. Skin sensitization to cinnamic alcohol: the role of skin metabolism. Acta Derm Venereol. 1992;72:264–5.Google Scholar
- 19.Melles D, Vielhaber T, Baumann A, Zazzeroni R, Karst U. In chemico evaluation of skin metabolism: investigation of eugenol and isoeugenol by electrochemistry coupled to liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;913–914:106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.European Commission. Consolidated version of Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC, Cosmetic Restriction III/1,79, 2009. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/cosmetics/html/consolidated_dir.htm. Accessed Dec 2010.
- 34.Wilkinson M, Goncalo M, Aerts O et al. The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;80:1–4.Google Scholar
- 44.Wetter DA, Yiannias JA, Prakash AV, Davis MDP, Farmer SA, el-Azhary RA. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000–2007. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:789–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.• Frosch PJ, Duus Johansen J, Schuttelaar MLA, et al. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009–2012. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:163–71 This study provides a thorough description of fragrance contact dermatitis in European countries.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, Elsner P, Frosch P, Burrows D, et al. A study of new fragrance mixtures. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9:202–6.Google Scholar
- 55.• Ung CY, White JML, White IR, Banerjee P, McFadden JP. Patch testing with the European baseline series fragrance markers: a 2016 update. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:776–80 This study states that current fragrance markers in the European Baseline Series are not enough to detect fragrance sensitization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Silvestre JF, Mercader P, González-Pérez R et al. Sensitization to fragrances in Spain: a 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015). Contact Dermatitis. 2018;80:94–100.Google Scholar