Advertisement

The demographic and clinical characteristics of an Italian population of adult outpatients with chronic cough

  • Giacomo Campi
  • Marianna NoaleEmail author
  • Alessio Fabbrizzi
  • Federico Lavorini
  • Stefania Maggi
  • Giovanni Fontana
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Chronic cough is a major health problem worldwide and patients are best managed in specialised tertiary centres. Little information is available on the characteristics of chronic cough patients in several European countries, including Italy.

Aims

We report on the demographic, anthropometric and clinical features of a large Italian population of adult chronic cough outpatients (about 1200), who were referred to a specialised clinic in Florence, Italy, from 2008 to 2018.

Methods

Demographic, environmental, lifestyle and clinical information was collected at enrolment by means of a custom-designed electronic questionnaire that only allowed for uniform responses. A subjective measure of cough-related discomfort (cough score) was also obtained using a modified Borg Scale. A multivariable logistic regression model was defined to identify the patients’ characteristics associated with the cough score.

Results

The characteristics of the examined population (n = 1204 outpatients) were strikingly similar to those described elsewhere. Female patients outnumbered the males [n = 847 females, (70.0%)]; both females and males displayed the same average cough score. The median age of outpatients was 61 (quartile 1 = 48; quartile 3 = 70) years; age and cough duration were unrelated to the cough score. Nasal obstruction, coughing during consultation, coughing during meals, throat clearing and the presence of respiratory abnormalities were correlated with the degree of discomfort caused by coughing.

Discussion

The features of chronic cough patients are similar worldwide. The process of cough reflex hypersensitisation may soothe sex-related perceptual differences, leading to similar levels of discomfort.

Conclusions

There seem to be clinical indicators that help in assessing the level of cough-related discomfort.

Keywords

Chronic cough Cough score Cough-related discomfort 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by an unrestricted grant from Merck. We wish to thank all those physicians and post-graduate students who participated in the data collection throughout the years.

Author contributions

GC, FL, AF and GAF conceived and designed the study, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript, which was critically revised by all authors. SM and MN analysed the data. All authors had access to the complete study data and had a say in the manuscript preparation, approval of the final version and the decision to submit for publication. GAF is the guarantor.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Ethics Committee of the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; OSS_14131) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All the participants signed an informed consent form.

Supplementary material

40520_2019_1464_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pratter MR, Brightling CE, Boulet LP et al (2006) An empiric integrative approach to the management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 129:222S–231SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morice AH, Fontana GA, Belvisi MG et al (2007) ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough. Eur Respir J 29:1256–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morice AH, McGarvey L, Pavord I (2006) Recommendations for the management of cough in adults. Thorax 61:i1–i24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lavorini F, Fontana GA, Chellini E et al (2010) Respiratory expulsive efforts evoked by maximal lung emptying. Chest 140:690–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lavorini F, Chellini E, Bigazzi F et al (2016) The clinical value of deflation cough in chronic coughers with reflux symptoms. Chest 149:1467–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morice AH, Jakes AD, Faruqi S et al (2014) A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response. Eur Respir J 44:1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morice AH (2002) Epidemiology of cough. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 15:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bende M, Millqvist E (2012) Prevalence of chronic cough in relation to upper and lower airway symptoms; the Skövde population-based study. Front Physiol 3:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rostami-Hodjegan A, Abdul-Manap R, Wright CE et al (2001) The placebo response to citric acid-induced cough: pharmacodynamics and gender differences. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 14:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelsall A, Decalmer S, McGuinness K et al (2009) Sex differences and predictors of objective cough frequency in chronic cough. Thorax 64:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujimura M, Sakamoto S, Kamio Y et al (1990) Sex difference in the inhaled tartaric acid cough threshold in non-atopic healthy subjects. Thorax 45:633–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dicpinigaitis PV, Rauf K (1998) The influence of gender on cough reflex sensitivity. Chest 113:1319–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Semple PF (1995) Putative mechanisms of cough after treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. J Hypertens Suppl. 13:S17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chung KF, McGarvey L, Mazzone S (2016) Chronic cough and cough hypersensitivity syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 4:934–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Birring SS, Prudon B, Carr AJ et al (2003) Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 58:339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Postgraduate School of Respiratory MedicineUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Italian National Research Council (CNR), Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch, PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations