Advertisement

Unknown osteoporosis in older patients admitted to post-acute rehabilitation

  • Kristof MajorEmail author
  • Stefanie Monod
  • Christophe J. Bula
  • Hélène Krief
  • Didier Hans
  • Olivier Lamy
  • Marc-Antoine Krieg
Original Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and increased health care use. As the number of older adults increases, identifying those at increased risk for osteoporotic fractures has become of utmost importance to providing them with preventive and therapeutic interventions.

Aims

To determine the prevalence of unknown clinical and densitometric osteoporosis and to investigate the performance of different diagnostic strategies for osteoporosis in elderly patients admitted to rehabilitation.

Method

This is an observational study. Eligible participants were older adults admitted to rehabilitation in an academic hospital in Switzerland over an 11-month period. Patients with previously unknown osteoporosis underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), and history review for past fractures.

Results

Complete assessment was available for 252 patients. Previously undiagnosed osteoporosis was identified in 62.3% of these patients, a proportion that was higher among women (71.5%) than men (44.8%). DXA proved most sensitive, followed by VFA and history review. Results differed across gender: DXA remained the most sensitive single test among women, but VFA proved most sensitive in men. The best test to combine with history review was DXA in women (detection increasing from 47.5 to 93.2%) and VFA in men (detection increasing from 35.9 to 84.6%).

Conclusions

Prevalence of previously unknown osteoporosis appears very high in elderly patients admitted to post-acute rehabilitation. The combination of history review of previous fractures with DXA in women and with VFA in men appears the best two-step strategy to improving detection of osteoporosis in this population.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Screening or diagnosis or detection Older patients Rehabilitation 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by internal research fund.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and cantonal research committee (Human Research Ethical Committee of Vaud Canton, Switzerland (Protocol Number 04/10) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–50Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA et al. (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20:1131–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0779-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al. (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR et al. (2007) Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 22:781–788.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070315 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK et al. (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915–1923.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1915 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, et al. (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070902 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:S3–S7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Lunt M et al. (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.716 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Hernlund E et al. (2014) Epidemiology and economic burden of osteoporosis in Switzerland. Arch Osteoporos 9:187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-014-0187-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M et al. (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanis J (2007) WHO technical report. University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A et al. (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.7.1384 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trombetti A, Herrmann F, Hoffmeyer P et al. (2002) Survival and potential years of life lost after hip fracture in men and age-matched women. Osteoporos Int 13:731–737.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980200100 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lippuner K, Grifone S, Schwenkglenks M et al. (2012) Comparative trends in hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures and other frequent diseases between 2000 and 2008. Osteoporos Int 23:829–839.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1660-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gillespie CW, Morin PE (2017) Osteoporosis-related health services utilization following first hip fracture among a cohort of privately-insured women in the United States, 2008–2014: an observational study. J Bone Miner Res 32:1052–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3079 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yusuf AA, Matlon TJ, Grauer A et al. (2016) Utilization of osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Osteoporos 11:31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-016-0285-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zarowitz BJ, Cheng LI, Allen C et al. (2015) Osteoporosis prevalence and characteristics of treated and untreated nursing home residents with osteoporosis. J Am Med Directors Assoc 16:341–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morris CA, Cabral D, Cheng H et al.(2004) Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions. J Gen Intern Med 19:783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30240.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenspan S, Nace D, Perera S et al. (2012) Lessons learned from an osteoporosis clinical trial in frail long-term care residents. Clin Trials (London, England) 9:247–256.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774511430516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    WHO (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greenspan SL, Perera S, Nace D et al.(2012) FRAX or fiction: determining optimal screening strategies for treatment of osteoporosis in residents in long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:684–690.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03884.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Padlina I, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Hans D et al. (2017) The lumbar spine age-related degenerative disease influences the BMD not the TBS: the Osteolaus cohort. Osteoporos Int 28:909–915.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3829-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangnon R et al. (2005) Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:1513–1518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1891-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Domiciano DS, Figueiredo CP, Lopes JB et al. (2013) Vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry: a valid tool to detect vertebral fractures in community-dwelling older adults in a population-based survey. Arthritis Care Res 65:809–815.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C et al.(1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Katz S (1983) Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 31:721–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontol 9:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R (1986) Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med 80:429–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA (1986) Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol J Aging Ment Health 5:165–173Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leslie WD, Langsetmo L, Zhou W et al. (2014) Choice of lumbar spine bone density reference database for fracture prediction in men and women: a population-based analysis. J Clin Densitom 17:295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C et al. (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 10:214–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hasserius R, Johnell O, Nilsson BE et al. (2003) Hip fracture patients have more vertebral deformities than subjects in population-based studies. Bone 32:180–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dreinhofer KE, Mitchell PJ, Begue T et al. (2018) A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures. Injury 49:1393–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vokes T, Bachman D, Baim S et al. (2006) Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 9:37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu G, Peacock M, Eilam O et al. (1997) Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 7:564–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vogt MT, Rubin DA, San Valentin R et al. (1999) Degenerative lumbar listhesis and bone mineral density in elderly women. The study of osteoporotic fractures. Spine 24:2536–2541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haugen IK, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Orstavik R et al. (2007) Bone mineral density in patients with hand osteoarthritis compared to population controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:1594–1598.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.068940 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ichchou L, Allali F, Rostom S et al. (2010) Relationship between spine osteoarthritis, bone mineral density and bone turn over markers in post menopausal women. BMC Women’s Health 10:25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-10-25 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hans D, Downs RW Jr, Duboeuf F et al. (2006) Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom 9:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric RehabilitationLausanne University Hospital, CHUVLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Bone Disease CenterLausanne University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations