Advertisement

Frailty index is associated with increased risk of elevated BNP in an elderly population: the Rugao Longevity and Ageing Study

  • Zheng-Dong Wang
  • Shun Yao
  • Guo-Ping Shi
  • Yong Wang
  • Jian-Ming Shi
  • Jiang-Hong Guo
  • Yin-Sheng Zhu
  • Xiao-Yan Jiang
  • Xue-Feng ChuEmail author
  • Xiao-Feng WangEmail author
Original Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Background and aims

To explore whether frailty, defined by frailty index (FI), is associated with the risk of elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a surrogate endpoint of cardiovascular events.

Methods

Data of 1382 community-dwelling elders who had no documented cardiovascular diseases aged 70–84 years from the ageing arm of the Rugao Longevity and Ageing Study was used. Traditional risk factor index (TI) was constructed using eight established cardiovascular-related risk factors. FI was constructed using 36 health deficits. Elevated BNP was defined as BNP ≥ 100pg/mL. Cardiovascular events include incident major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death.

Results

During a 3-year follow-up period, 97 participants had cardiovascular events. TI was not associated with the risk of elevated BNP, but was associated with cardiovascular events (HR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.34). Frailty index was not only associated with cardiovascular events (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.06–1.64), but also associated with elevated BNP with an OR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.02–1.47) for each 0.1 increment. Further, both frailty (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.67–3.17) and pre-frailty (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.06–2.25) were associated with increased risk of elevated BNP.

Conclusion

FI is associated with increased risks of both cardiovascular events and surrogated endpoint of cardiovascular disease—elevated BNP. Frailty may be a non-traditional risk factor of cardiovascular diseases and frailty index may be a measurement for early identifying high risk elderly individuals of cardiovascular abnormities.

Keywords

Cardiovascular diseases BNP Traditional risk factors Frailty index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all participants involved in the present study.

Funding

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC2000400, 2018YFC2002000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571372, 81670465, 81600577), the Shanghai natural science grant (16ZR1449400).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Human Ethics Committee of the School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, approved the present study.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.

Supplementary material

40520_2019_1189_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary file1 (docx 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tzoulaki I, Elliott P, Kontis V et al (2016) Worldwide exposures to cardiovascular risk factors and associated health effects: current knowledge and data gaps. Circulation 133:2314–2333.  https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.008718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A et al (2017) Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK et al (2011) Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet 378:1231–1243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61215-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Peet PG, Drewes YM, de Craen AJ et al (2013) NT-proBNP best predictor of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality in secondary prevention in very old age: the Leiden 85-plus Study. PLoS One 8:e81400.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM et al (2002) Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med 347:161–167.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vuolteenaho O, Ala-Kopsala M, Ruskoaho H (2005) BNP as a biomarker in heart disease. Adv Clin Chem 40:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cannon CP, Brindis RG, Chaitman BR et al (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical data standards (writing committee to develop acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease clinical data standards). J Am Coll Cardiol 61:992–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Ruijter W, Westendorp RG, Assendelft WJ et al (2009) Use of Framingham risk score and new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study. Bmj 338:a3083.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lind L, Sundstrom J, Arnlov J et al. (2018) Impact of aging on the strength of cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal study over 40 years. J Am Heart Assoc.  https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.00706110.1161/jaha.117.007061Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R et al (2005) Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 352:2049–2060.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Ballantyne CM et al (2006) An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Arch Intern Med 166:1368–1373.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.13.1368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I et al (2008) Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. Jama 300:197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.2.197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Melander O, Newton-Cheh C, Almgren P et al (2009) Novel and conventional biomarkers for prediction of incident cardiovascular events in the community. Jama 302:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Humphrey LL, Fu R, Rogers K et al (2008) Homocysteine level and coronary heart disease incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 83:1203–1212.  https://doi.org/10.4065/83.11.1203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA et al (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8:24.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:392–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381:752–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drubbel I, de Wit NJ, Bleijenberg N et al (2013) Prediction of adverse health outcomes in older people using a frailty index based on routine primary care data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68:301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ et al (2014) Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:747–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Veronese N, Cereda E, Stubbs B et al (2017) Risk of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in frail and pre-frail older adults: results from a meta-analysis and exploratory meta-regression analysis. Ageing Res Rev 35:63–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang M, Foebel AD, Kuja-Halkola R et al (2017) Frailty index as a predictor of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a Swedish population-based cohort. Aging (Albany NY) 9:2629–2646.  https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y et al (2016) Cohort profile: the Rugao Longevity and Ageing Study (RuLAS). Int J Epidemiol 45:1064–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW et al (1963) Studies of illness in the aged. the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Imai Y, Hasegawa K (1994) The revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale (HDS-R)—evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia. Hong Kong J Psychiatry 4:5Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL et al (1982) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nyunt MS, Fones C, Niti M et al (2009) Criterion-based validity and reliability of the Geriatric Depression Screening Scale (GDS-15) in a large validation sample of community-living Asian older adults. Aging Ment Health 13:376–382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860902861027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsai N, Gao ZX (1989) Validity of Hasegawas Dementia Scale for screening dementia among aged Chinese. International Psychogeriatrics 1:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610289000153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rockwood K, Mitnitski A (2007) Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:722–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Morley JE (2014) A comparison of four frailty models. J Am Geriatr Soc 62:721–726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2007) A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:738–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abbott RD, Curb JD, Rodriguez BL et al (2003) Age-related changes in risk factor effects on the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic stroke. J Clin Epidemiol 56:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abbott RD, Curb JD, Rodriguez BL et al (2002) Age-related changes in risk factor effects on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Ann Epidemiol 12:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wallace LM, Theou O, Kirkland SA et al (2014) Accumulation of non-traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease is associated with incident coronary heart disease hospitalization and death. PLoS One 9:e90475.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ueda R, Yokouchi M, Suzuki T et al (2003) Prognostic value of high plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in very elderly persons. Am J Med 114:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yamashita T, Kohara K, Tabara Y et al (2014) Muscle mass, visceral fat, and plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide in healthy individuals (from the J-SHIPP Study). Am J Cardiol 114:635–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng-Dong Wang
    • 1
  • Shun Yao
    • 2
    • 3
  • Guo-Ping Shi
    • 1
  • Yong Wang
    • 1
  • Jian-Ming Shi
    • 1
  • Jiang-Hong Guo
    • 1
  • Yin-Sheng Zhu
    • 1
  • Xiao-Yan Jiang
    • 4
  • Xue-Feng Chu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiao-Feng Wang
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Rugao People’s HospitalRugaoChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Biomedical SciencesFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Arrhythmias of the Ministry of Education of ChinaTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations