Advertisement

Prognostic factors that modify outcomes of vestibular rehabilitation in elderly patients with falls

  • Marcos Rossi-IzquierdoEmail author
  • Pilar Gayoso-Diz
  • Sofía Santos-Pérez
  • María Del-Río-Valeiras
  • Ana Faraldo-García
  • Isabel Vaamonde-Sánchez-Andrade
  • Antonio Lirola-Delgado
  • Andrés Soto-Varela
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Our previous study has shown that vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is an effective technique to reduce falls in elderly patients. It would be interesting to establish patients’ clinical characteristics in which vestibular rehabilitation is expected to be more effective.

Aims

Evaluate factors that could modify rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients with previous falls.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients randomized to one of the intervention group (computerized dynamic posturography—CDP—training, optokinetic stimulus or exercise at home) and with previous falls were analyzed. Patients were assessed with objective outcome measures (sensorial organization test and limits of stability—LOS—of CDP, modified timed up and go test—TUG—and number of falls) and with subjective outcome measures (dizziness handicap inventory and Short falls efficacy scale-international—Short FES-I) during a 12-month follow-up period.

Results

In the logistic regression model, a worse score in the maximum excursion (MXM), and a shorter time in the TUG significantly associated with a reduction > 50% of falls. Also, association with a higher score in the Short FES-I was close to a statistical significance. There was no statistical significance association with other covariables.

Discussion

In patients with reduced limits of stability, VR seems to be more effective and they should be encouraged to perform it. But on the other hand, patients with longer time in the TUG show worse outcomes and may benefit more with gait training.

Conclusions

VR in elderly people with previous falls is effective regardless of their age and gender.

Keywords

Vestibular rehabilitation Outcomes Prognostic factor Falls Elderly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Andrés Blanco Hortas (Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela) for his statistical expertise.

Funding

This study was funded by the project PI11/01328, integrated into the State Plan for R + D + I 2008–2011 and funded by the ISCIIISubdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación and the European Regional Development Fund: “Reduction of falls in the elderly by improving balance through vestibular rehabilitation”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The study was performed according to the protocol approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of Galicia (Protocol 2010/139).

Informed consent

Signed informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Financial disclosure

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

References

  1. 1.
    Anson E, Jeka J (2016) Perspectives on aging vestibular function Front Neurol 6:269Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gadkaree SK, Sun DQ, Li C et al (2016) Does sensory function decline independently or concomitantly with age? Data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Aging Res 2016:1865038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swift CG, Iliffe S (2014) Assesment and prevention of falls in older people—concise guidance. Clin Med (Lond) 14:658–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ungar A, Rafanelli M, Iacomelli I et al (2013) Fall prevention in the elderly. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 10:91–95Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tricco AC, Thomas SM, Veroniki AA et al (2017) Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 318:1687–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK et al (2019) Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD012424Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avin KG, Hanke TA, Kirk-Sanchez N et al (2015) Management of falls in community-dwelling older adults: clinical guidance statement from the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther 95:815–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geraghty AWA, Essery R, Kirby S et al (2017) Internet-based vestibular rehabilitation for older adults with chronic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Ann Family Med 15:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossi-Izquierdo M, Gayoso-Diz P, Santos-Pérez S et al (2018) Vestibular rehabilitation in elderly patients with postural instability: reducing the number of falls—a randomized clinical trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 30:1353–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soto-Varela A, Gayoso-Diz P, Rossi-Izquierdo M et al (2015) Reduction of falls in older people by improving balance with vestibular rehabilitation (ReFOVeRe study): design and methods. Aging Clin Exp Res 27:841–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) ‘‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pérez N, Garmendia I, Martín E, García Tapia R (2000) Adaptación cultural de dos cuestionarios de medida de la salud en pacientes con vértigo. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 51:572–580Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kempen GI, Yardley L, van Haastregt JC et al (2008) The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing 37:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lomas-Vega R, Hita-Contreras F, Mendoza N et al (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International in Spanish postmenopausal women. Menopause 19:904–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nashner LM (2011) Computerized dynamic posturography. In: Goebel JA (ed) Practical management of the dizzy patient. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 143–170Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rossi M, Soto A, Santos S et al (2009) A prospective study of alteration of balance among patients with Parkinson’s disease: protocol of the postural evaluation. Eur Neurol 61:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cawthorne T (1944) The physiological basis for head exercises. J Chartered Soc Physiother 30:106Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cooksey FS (1946) Rehabilitation in vestibular injuries. Proc R Soc Med 39:273Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Girardi M, Konrad HR, Amin M et al (2001) Predicting fall risks in an elderly population: computer dynamic posturography versus electronystagmography test results. Laryngoscope 111:1528–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rossi-Izquierdo M, Basta D, Rubio-Rodríguez JP et al (2014) Is posturography able to identify fallers in patients with Parkinson´s disease? Gait Posture 40:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C et al (2014) Is the timed up and go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 14:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park SH (2018) Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 30:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL et al (2016) Vestibular rehabilitation for peripheral vestibular hypofunction: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline: from the american physical therapy association neurology section. J Neurol Phys Ther 40:124–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herdman SJ, Hall CD, Delaune W (2012) Variables associated with outcome in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kao CL, Chen LK, Chern CM et al (2010) Rehabilitation outcome in home-based versus supervised exercise programs for chronically dizzy patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 51:264–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity Hospital Lucus AugustiLugoSpain
  2. 2.Institute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of OtolaryngologyComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical SpecialitiesUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
  5. 5.Department of OtolaryngologyComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de OurenseOrenseSpain

Personalised recommendations