The association of health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy with frailty
Frailty is a state of vulnerability to stressors which may result in high mortality, morbidity, and health-care utilization in older adults. Whether health literacy, graph literacy and numeracy are associated with frailty is unknown.
To assess the association of health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy with frailty in male veterans.
This is a retrospective study of 470 cognitively intact, non-depressed veterans who completed evaluations of health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy at Miami VA facility in 2012. A 43-item frailty index was created as a proportion of all potential variables (demographics, comorbidities, number of medications, laboratory tests, and activities of daily life). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by multinomial logistic regression models with frailty status (robust, prefrail and frail) as the outcome variable, and with health literacy, numeracy, and graph literacy scores as independent variables. Age, race, ethnicity, education, socio-economic status, and comorbidities were considered as covariates.
Patients were 100% male, 40% White, 82% non-Hispanic, mean age was 56.8 years. The proportion of robust, pre-frail and frail was 10.0%, 61.3% and 28.7%, respectively. Neither health literacy nor objective nor subjective numeracy was associated with frailty after adjustment for covariates. In contrast, higher graph literacy scores were associated with a lower risk for frailty (p = .015) even after adjusting known risk factors for frailty.
Discussion and conclusion
Neither health literacy nor numeracy is associated with frailty. Higher graph literacy score is associated with a lower risk for frailty even after adjusting for known risk factors for frailty.
KeywordsFrailty Health literacy Numeracy Graph literacy Veterans
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
We obtained approval from our IRB as a quality improvement project exempted from informed consent to conduct a retrospective electronic health record review.
- 3.Feng Z, Lugtenberg M, Franse C, Fang X et al (2017) Risk factors and protective factors associated with incident or increase of frailty among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS One 12:e0178383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178383 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press US, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Pleasant A, Rudd RE, O’Leary C, et al (2016) Considerations for a new definition of health literacy: National Academy of Medicine Washington, DC. https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Considerations-for-a-New-Definition-of-Health-Literacy.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2019
- 8.Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE et al (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 155:97–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4816-155-2-201107190-00005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rodriguez V, Andrade AD, Garcia-Retamero R et al (2013) Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians. J Health Commun. 18(Suppl 1):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.829137 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC et al (1997) The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 127:966–972. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cokely ET, Galesic M, Schulz E et al (2012) Measuring risk literacy: the Berlin numeracy test. Judgm Decis Mak. 7:25–47Google Scholar