Advertisement

Older persons with signs of frailty in a home-based physical exercise intervention: baseline characteristics of an RCT

  • Sara SuikkanenEmail author
  • Paula Soukkio
  • Kaisu Pitkälä
  • Sanna Kääriä
  • Hannu Kautiainen
  • Sarianna Sipilä
  • Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula
  • Markku Hupli
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Increasing the level of physical activity among persons with signs of frailty improves physical functioning. There is a lack of long-term supervised physical exercise intervention studies including a validated definition of frailty.

Aims

To present baseline characteristics of persons with signs of frailty participating in a randomized long-term home-based physical exercise trial (HIPFRA), and to study associations between the severity of frailty, functional independence and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL).

Methods

Three hundred persons, ≥ 65 years old and with signs of frailty (assessed by Fried´s phenotype criteria) were recruited from South Karelia, Finland and randomized to a 12-month physiotherapist-supervised home-based physical exercise program (n = 150), and usual care (n = 150). Assessments at the participants’ homes at baseline, and after 3, 6 and 12 months included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), HRQoL (15D) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Results

Eligibility was screened among 520 persons; 300 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. One person withdrew consent after randomization. A majority (75%) were women, 182 were pre-frail and 117 frail. The mean age was 82.5 (SD 6.3) years, SPPB 6.2 (2.6), FIM 108.8 (10.6) and MMSE 24.4 (3.1) points, with no significant differences between the study groups. Inverse associations between the severity of frailty vs. FIM scores and HRQoL (p < 0.001 for both) were found.

Conclusions

Our participants showed marked physical frailty without major disabilities. The severity of frailty seems to be associated with impaired functional independence and HRQoL.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02305433

Keywords

Frailty Exercise Disability Health-related quality-of-life Community-dwelling older people 

Notes

Funding

The HIPFRA study is funded by the South Karelia Social and Health Care District (Eksote, register number 1236/00.01.05.01/2013), by two governmental funding sources; The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (SII, register number 94/331/2013) and State Research Funding for Academic Health Research (Ministry of Social Affairs and Health), and by the Vyborg Foundation Against Tuberculosis. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, in collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Morley JE, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:392–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clegg A, Young J, Illiffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381:752–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouillon K, Kivimaki M, Hamer M et al (2013) Measures of frailty in population-based studies: an overview. BMC Geriatrics 13:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Cardiovascular health study collaborative research group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rockwood K, Mitnitski A (2007) Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol. 62A:722–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK (2012) A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 16:601–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS et al (2017) The Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines for the management of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:564–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Gómez-Cabrera MC, Pérez-Ros P et al (2016) A Multicomponent exercise intervention that reverse frailty and improves cognition, emotion and social networking in the community-dwelling frail elderly: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langlois F, Vu TTM, Chassé K, Dupuis G, Kergoat M-J, Bherer L (2013) Benefits of physical exercise training on cognition and quality of life in frail older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68:400–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Theou O, Stathokostas L, Roland KP et al (2011) The effective interventions for the management of frailty: A systematic review. J Aging Res.  https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/569194 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franco MR, Howard K, Sherrington C et al (2015) Eliciting older people´s preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment. J Physiother 61:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bray NW, Smart RR, Jakobi JM, Jones GR (2016) Exercise prescription to reverse frailty. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 41:1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Vries NM, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JSM, Olde Rikkert MGM, Staal JB, Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MWG (2012) Effects of physical exercise therapy on mobility, physical functioning, physical activity and quality of life in community-living older adults with impaired mobility, physical disability and/or multi-morbidity: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 11:136–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landi F, Cesari M, Calvani R et al (2017) The “Sarcopenia and physical fRailty IN older people: multi componenT treatment strategies” (SPRINTT) randomized controlled trial: design and methods. Aging Clin Exp Res 29:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soukkio P, Suikkanen S, Kääriä S et al (2018) Effects of home-based physiotherapy on duration of living at home and functional capacity among older persons with signs of frailty or with recent hip fracture—protocol of a randomized controlled trial (HIPFRA study). BMC Geriatrics 18:232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHug PR (1975) ”Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guralnik J, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS (1986) Advances in functional assessment in medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA (1986) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL (ed) Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and intervention. The Haworth Press, New York, pp 165–173Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G et al (2006) Overview of the MNA®—its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging. 10:456–465Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sintonen H (1994) The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. I. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. National centre for health program evaluation, working paper 41, Melbourne, Australia https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/64d2/f291b61e8f7ca83cf890736cf52d2ead0a71.pdf Accessed Feb 21, 2019
  24. 24.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Helldán A, Helakorpi S (2014) Health behaviour and health among the Finnish elderly, Spring 2013, with trends 1993–2013. National institute for health and welfare (THL), Report 15/2014. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-188-4. Accessed Feb 21 2019
  26. 26.
    Stenholm S, Ferrucci L, Vahtera J et al (2018) Natural course of frailty components in people who develop frailty syndrome: evidence from two cohort studies. J Gerontol.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly132 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Op het Veld LPM, van Rossum E, Kempen GIJM, de Vet HCW, Hajema KJ, Beurskens AJHM, (2015) Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. BMC Geriatrics 15:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pahor M, Guralnik J, Ambrosius WT et al (2018) Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: the LIFE study randomized clinical trial. JAMA 18:2387–2396Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marzetti E, Cesari M, Calvani R et al (2018) The “Sarrcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT treatment strategies” (SPRINTT) randomized controlled trial: case finding, screening and characteristics of eligible participants. Exp Gerontol 113:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fielding RA, Rejeski WJ, Blair S et al (2011) The lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: design and methods. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66A:1226–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pitkälä KH, Pöysti MM, Laakkonen M-L et al (2013) Effects of the finnish alzheimer disease exercise trial (FINALEX) -a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med 173:894–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kawaryshanker S, Raymond W, Ingram K, Inderjeeth CA (2014) Effect of frailty on functional gain resource utilisation, and discharge destination: an observational prospective study in a GEM ward. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/357857 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Masel MC, Graham JE, Reistetter TA, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ (2009) Frailty and health related quality of life in older Mexican Americans. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:70.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kojima G, Iliffe S, Morries RW et al (2016) Frailty predicts trajectories of quality of life over time among British community dwelling older people. Qual Life Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1213-2 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RehabilitationSouth Karelia Social and Health Care DistrictLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.Department of General Practice, and Helsinki University Hospital, Unit of Primary Health CareUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Aureolis OyEspooFinland
  4. 4.Gerontology Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations