Advertisement

Effect of a mixed-exercise program on physical capacity and sedentary behavior in older adults during cancer treatments

  • René Maréchal
  • Adeline Fontvieille
  • Hugo Parent-Roberge
  • Tamàs Fülöp
  • Eléonor Riesco
  • Michel Pavic
  • Isabelle J. DionneEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Aging, cancer and its treatment all contribute to increase the risk of deconditioning and sedentary behaviors. Mixed exercise is recognized to counteract the effects of aging and deconditioning as well as improving physical capacity during cancer treatment in adults.

Aims

To determine the impact of a mixed exercise program (MXEP) to improve physical capacity and decrease sedentary behavior time (SBT) in older adults during cancer treatment.

Methods

Fourteen participants (68.8 ± 3.4 years) completed 12 weeks of a mixed exercise program (MEXP) (n = 6) or stretching (n = 8) while they were under cancer treatment. Five tests of the Senior Fitness Test (Chair Stand, 8-Foot Up & Go, Arm Curl, Sit & Reach, 6 min Walk Test), two maximal strength tests (leg press and handgrip) and a Global Physical Capacity Score (GPCS) were used to assess physical capacity. For the amount of SBT (min/day), we used question 1 of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly.

Results

Both groups presented significant pre- vs post-intervention differences for the Chair Stand, Arm Curl, 6 min Walk Tests and also GPCS. Nevertheless, this difference was significantly greater in the MEXP group only for the Chair Stand Test (4.3 ± 2.2 vs 1.0 ± 1.3 reps; p = 0.01) and the GPCS (4.0 ± 0.6 vs 1.5 ± 2.3 points; p = 0.047). A tend to display a greater decrease in SBT (− 295 ± 241 min/week vs − 11 ± 290 min/week; p = 0.079) was observed in favor of MEXP.

Conclusion

A 12-week mixed exercise program led to significant improvements in physical capacity and may reduce SBT.

Keywords

Cancer Exercise Sedentary behavior Physical capacity Older adult 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank all participants of the CANEX study.

Funding

The study was funded by the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors announce that there was no conflict of interests in relation with this study.

Statement of human and animal rights

The study was approved by the CIUSSS Estrie—CHUS Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

References

  1. 1.
    de Magalhães JP (2013) How ageing processes influence cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13:357–365.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3497 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balducci L, Fossa SD (2013) Rehabilitation of older cancer patients. Acta Oncol 52:233–238.  https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.744142 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinto BM, Eakin E, Maruyama NC (2000) Health behavior changes after a cancer diagnosis: what do we know and where do we go from here? Ann Behav Med 22:38–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895166 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT et al (1980) Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Am J Med 69:491–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(05)80001-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohile SG, Velarde C, Hurria A et al (2015) Geriatric assessment-guided care processes for older adults: a delphi consensus of geriatric oncology experts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:1120–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA et al (2009) Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1510–1530.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones LW, Courneya KS (2002) Exercise discussions during cancer treatment consultations. Cancer Pract 10:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5394.2002.102004.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones LW, Eves ND, Haykowsky M et al (2009) Exercise intolerance in cancer and the role of exercise therapy to reverse dysfunction. Lancet Oncol 10:598–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70031-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kilari D, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Mohile SG et al (2016) Designing exercise clinical trials for older adults with cancer: Recommendations from 2015 Cancer and Aging Research Group NCI U13 Meeting. J Geriatr Oncol 7:293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.04.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C et al (2010) American college of sports medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E et al (2017) Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 24:e290–e315.  https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3619 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mustian KM, Cole CL, Lin PJ et al (2016) Exercise recommendations for the management of symptoms clusters resulting from cancer and cancer treatments. Semin Oncol Nurs 32:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2016.09.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E et al (2017) Exercise for people with cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 24:40.  https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3376 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Penedo FJ, Schneiderman N, Dahn JR et al (2004) Physical activity interventions in the elderly: cancer and comorbidity. Cancer Invest 22:51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klepin HD, Mohile SG, Mihalko S (2013) Exercise for older cancer patients: feasible and helpful? Interdiscip Top Gerontol 38:146–157.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000343597 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galvão DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N et al (2010) Combined resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:340–347.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2488 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bourke L, Doll H, Crank H et al (2011) Lifestyle intervention in men with advanced prostate cancer receiving androgen suppression therapy: a feasibility study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20:647–657.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buffart LM, Galvão DA, Chinapaw MJ et al (2014) Mediators of the resistance and aerobic exercise intervention effect on physical and general health in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 120:294–301.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28396 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C et al (2013) Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med 34:631–636.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1323746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rikli RE, Jones J (1999) Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Act 7:129–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wells KF, Dillon EK (1952) The sit and reach—a test of back and leg flexibility. Research Quarterly American Association for Health. Phys Educ Recreat 23:115–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1952.10761965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Société canadienne de physiologie de l’exercice (2013) La santé par la pratique d’activité physique. Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson WR (2010) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wathan D (1994) Load assignment. In: Baechle TR (eds) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 435–446Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rikli RE, Jones CJ (1999) Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act 7:162–181.  https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.7.2.162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Statistique C (2016) Tableau 3 Valeurs de référence pour certains centiles de la force de préhension maximale (en kilogrammes), selon le sexe et l’âge, d’après les équations de référence pour les Canadiens de 6 à 79 ans. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2016010/article/14665/tbl/tbl03-fra.htm. Accessed 12 May 2017
  27. 27.
    Liu RD, Buffart LM, Kersten MJ et al (2011) Psychometric properties of two physical activity questionnaires, the AQuAA and the PASE, in cancer patients. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:30.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-30 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenthal R (1991) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Galvão DA, Spry N, Denham J et al (2014) A multicentre year-long randomised controlled trial of exercise training targeting physical functioning in men with prostate cancer previously treated with androgen suppression and radiation from TROG 03.04 RADAR. Eur Urol 65:856–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gallo LH, Gonçalves R, Gurjão ALD et al (2013) Effect of different stretching volumes on functional capacity in elderly women. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano.  https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2013v15n1p103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    e Lima KMM, Carneiro SP, Alves D de S, et al (2015) Assessment of muscle architecture of the biceps femoris and vastus lateralis by ultrasound after a chronic stretching program. Clin J Sport Med 25:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lacroix A, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T et al (2016) Effects of a supervised versus an unsupervised combined balance and strength training program on balance and muscle power in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 62:275–288.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000442087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wright AA, Cook CE, Baxter GD et al (2011) A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41:319–327.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3515 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Spencer L, Zafiropoulos B, Denniss W et al (2018) Is there a learning effect when the 6-minute walk test is repeated in people with suspected pulmonary hypertension? Chron Respir Dis.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972317752762 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin A, Fitzsimons C, Jepson R et al (2015) Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 49:1056–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094524 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lang IA, Llewellyn DJ, Alexander K et al (2008) Obesity, physical function, and mortality in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1474–1478.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01813.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Physical Activity SciencesUniversity of SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
  2. 2.Research Centre on AgingAffiliated with CIUSSS de l’Estrie-CHUSSherbrookeCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations