Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 25, Supplement 1, pp 75–76 | Cite as

Considerations on evolution and healing of vertebral fractures

  • Raymond Klumpp
  • Carlo Trevisan
  • Veronica Nava
  • Domenico Riccardi
  • Wilmer Recalcati
Short Communication
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

Only little is known when talking about the evolution of a vertebral fracture. From the few studies available in the literature, we can deduce that the risk a vertebral compression fracture has to worsen its deformity is consistent. It is important to try to make a prognosis on how the fracture is going to heal based on the type of fracture encountered. A chapter of its own is the occurrence of a vertebral fracture non-union that is difficult to diagnose and treat, but comes along with a poor prognosis.

Keywords

Vertebral fracture Fracture healing Prognosis Vertebral non-union 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author certifies that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Sugita M, Watanabe N, Mikami Y, Hase H, Kubo T (2005) Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):376–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burger H, Van Daele PL, Grashuis K, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, Schütte HE, Birkenhäger JC, Pols HA (1997) Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 12(1):152–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reeve J, Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Scheidt-Nave C, Poor G, Gennari C, Weber K, Lorenc R, Masaryk P, Cannata JB, Dequeker J, Reid DM, Pols HA, Benevolenskaya LI, Stepan JJ, Miazgowski T, Bhalla A, Bruges Armas J, Eastell R, Lopes-Vaz A, Lyritis G, Jajic I, Woolf AD, Banzer D, Reisinger W, Todd CJ, Felsch B, Havelka S, Hoszowski K, Janott J, Johnell O, Raspe HH, Yershova OB, Kanis JA, Armbrecht G, Finn JD, Gowin W, O’Neill TW, European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group (2003) Determinants of the size of incident vertebral deformities in European men and women in the sixth to ninth decades of age: the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 18(9):1664–1673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crans GG, Genant HK, Krege JH (2005) Prognostic utility of a semiquantitative spinal deformity index. Bone 37(2):175–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD, OFELY Study (2004) Disc space narrowing is associated with an increased vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women: the OFELY Study. J Bone Miner Res 19(12):1994–1999 (epub 2004 Sep 13)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pham T, Azulay-Parrado J, Champsaur P, Chagnaud C, Legré V, Lafforgue P (2005) “Occult” osteoporotic vertebral fractures: vertebral body fractures without radiologic collapse. Spine 30(21):2430–2435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takahara K, Kamimura M, Nakagawa H, Hashidate H, Uchiyama S (2007) Radiographic evaluation of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients. J Clin Neurosci 14(2):122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH (2003) Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 23(1):179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theodorou DJ (2001) The intravertebral vacuum cleft sign. Radiology 221(3):787–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young WF, Brown D, Kendler A, Clements D (2002) Delayed post-traumatic osteonecrosis of a vertebral body (Kummell’s disease). Acta Orthop Belg 68(1):13–19PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond Klumpp
    • 1
  • Carlo Trevisan
    • 1
  • Veronica Nava
    • 1
  • Domenico Riccardi
    • 1
  • Wilmer Recalcati
    • 1
  1. 1.Reparto di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Ospedale “S.S. Capitanio e Gerosa”Lovere (BG)Italy

Personalised recommendations