Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 203–209 | Cite as

The ability to point to well-known places in young and older adults

  • Chiara Meneghetti
  • Erika Borella
  • Felicia Fiore
  • Rossana De Beni
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims

A mental map of well-known places is organized according to a specific orientation where spatial information located in front of a person is more accessible than information located at the back (front-back effect). This study investigated age-related differences between young and older adults in building a mental map of well-known places when front and back pointing were required.

Methods

Thirty young (20–30 year olds) and 29 older (60–72 year olds) adults living in the same Italian town were compared in their ability to point to places inside their own town, and surrounding villages located in the front and back of their physical position in the city. A series of visuo-spatial tasks were also administered.

Results

Our results showed that young and older adults’ performance in pointing to well-known places did not differ significantly, and that participants were affected by the pointing direction (i.e. forwards vs. backwards) and the type of place (i.e. in town vs. surrounding villages). It was easier for both young and older adults to point to places in town that were in front of them rather than behind them; there were no differences between pointing forwards or backwards in the surrounding villages. The influence of visuo-spatial abilities on pointing performance changed as a function of age: it was only in the older adults (not in the younger) that a spatial visualization task correlated with pointing performance.

Conclusions

This study showed that older adults, despite their spatial cognitive decline shown by visuo-spatial tasks, retained the ability to build a mental representation of well-known places and were specifically sustained by spatial visualization ability.

Keywords

Pointing ability Visuo-spatial abilities Age differences 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsh DA, Krauss IK, Regnier VA (1981) Spatial ability, environmental knowledge, and environmental use: The elderly. In: LS Liben, A Patterson, N Newcombe (eds) Spatial representation and behavior across the life span, New York, NY, Academic Press, pp 321–357Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neisser U (1976) Cognition and Reality. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shepard RN (1978) The mental image. Am Psychol 33:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sholl MJ (1987) Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15:110–125Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craik FIM, Salthouse TA (2008) Handbook of aging and cognition, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salthouse TA, Babcock RL, Skovronek E, Mitchell DRD, Palmon R (1990) Age and experience effects in spatial visualization. Dev Psychol 26:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dollinger SMC (1995) Mental rotation performance: age, sex, and visual field differences. Dev Neuropsychol 11:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herman JF, Coyne AC (1980) Mental manipulations of spatial information in young and elderly adults. Dev Psychol 16:537–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inagaki H, Meguro K, Shimada M, Ishizaki J, Okuzumi H, Yamadori A (2002) Discrepancy between mental rotation and perspective-taking abilities in normal aging assessed by Piaget’s three-mountain task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24:18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilkniss SM, Jones MG, Korol DL, Gold PE, Manning CA (1997) Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychol Aging 12:372–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirasic KC (2000) Age differences in adults’ spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behavior. Spat Cogn Comput 2:117–134Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barrash J (1994) Age-related decline in route learning ability. Dev Neuropsychol 10:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Presson CC, Hazelrigg MD (1984) Building spatial representation through primary and secondary learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 10:716–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Beni R, Pazzaglia F, Gardini S (2006) The role of mental rotation and age in spatial perspective taking tasks: when age does not impair perspective-taking performance. Appl Cognitive Psych 20:807–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meneghetti C, Fiore F, Borella E, De Beni R (2011) Learning a map of environment: The role of visuo-spatial abilities in young and older adults. Appl Cognitive Psych 25:952–959Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crook TH, Bartus RT, Ferris SH, Whitehouse P, Cohen GD, Gershon S (1986) Age-associated memory impairment: proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change. Report of a National Institute of Mental Health Work Group. Dev Neuropsychol 1986(2):261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wechsler D (1981) Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised (WAIS-R). The Psychological Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 17:299–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Likert R, Quasha WH (1941) Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board. Psychological Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Motor Skill 47:599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty MA (2001) Dissociation between object-manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem Cognition 29:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Linn MC, Petersen AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of gender differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McKenna FP (1984) Measures of field dependence: cognitive style or cognitive ability? J Pers Soc Psychol 47:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Meneghetti
    • 1
  • Erika Borella
    • 1
  • Felicia Fiore
    • 1
  • Rossana De Beni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations