Adolescents and young adults engaged with pro-eating disorder social media: eating disorder and comorbid psychopathology, health care utilization, treatment barriers, and opinions on harnessing technology for treatment
- 106 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to examine exposure (i.e., seeing, following, posting) to body image content emphasizing a thin ideal on various social media platforms and probable eating disorder (ED) diagnoses, ED-related quality of life, and psychiatric comorbidities (i.e., depression, anxiety) among adolescents and young adult females recruited via social media who endorsed viewing and/or posting pro-ED online content. We also investigated health care utilization, treatment barriers, and opinions on harnessing technology for treatment.
Participants were 405 adolescent and young adult females engaged with pro-ED social media. We reported on study constructs for the sample as a whole, as well as on differences between age groups.
Eighty-four percent of participants’ self-reported symptoms were consistent with a clinical/subclinical ED, and this was slightly more common among young adults. Participants endorsed reduced ED-related quality of life, as well as comorbid depression and anxiety. Among those with clinical/subclinical EDs, only 14% had received treatment. The most common treatment barriers were believing the problem was not serious enough and believing one should help themselves. The majority of participants approved of harnessing technology for treatment.
Results provide support for engagement with pro-ED online content serving as a potential indicator of ED symptoms and suggest promise for facilitating linkage from social media to technology-enhanced interventions.
Level of evidence
V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
KeywordsFeeding and eating disorders Adolescent Young adult Social media Cross-sectional studies
This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health [Grant Numbers R21 MH112331 and K08 MH120341].
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
This study was reviewed and approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board.
Participants consented to participate online.
- 14.Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, Ólafsson K (2010) Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspective of European children: key findings from the EU Kids Online survey of 9 to 16-year-old and their parents in 25 countries. EU Kids OnlineGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pater JA, Haimson OL, Andalibi N, Mynatt ED (2016) “Hunger hurts but starving works:” characterizing the presentation of eating disorders online. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, California, USA. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2820030
- 21.Hefner V, Dorros SM, Jourdain N, Liu C, Tortomasi A, Greene MP et al (2016) Mobile exercising and tweeting the pounds away: the use of digital applications and microblogging and their association with disordered eating and compulsive exercise. Cogent Soc Sci 2:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1176304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Common Sense (2015) The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/census_researchreport.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2019
- 26.Lenhart A (2015) Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew research center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/. Accessed 03 July 2019
- 27.PewResearchCenter (2018) Social media fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/. Accessed 03 July 2019
- 35.Graham AK, Trockel M, Weisman H, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Balantekin KN, Wilfley DE, Taylor CB (2019) A screening tool for detecting eating disorder risk and diagnostic symptoms among college-age women. J Am Coll Health 67:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1483936 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Ackard DM, Richter S, Egan A, Engel S, Cronemeyer CL (2014) The meaning of (quality of) life in patients with eating disorders: a comparison of generic and disease-specific measures across diagnosis and outcome. Int J Eat Disord 47:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22193 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JW, Monahan PO, Löwe B (2007) Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med 146:317–325. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Mossman SA, Luft MJ, Schroeder HK, Varney ST, Fleck DE, Barzman DH et al (2017) The generalize anxiety disorder 7-item scale in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: signal detection and validation. Ann Clin Psychiatr 29:227–234aGoogle Scholar
- 53.Zagorski N (2017) Using many social media platforms linked with depression, anxiety risk. https://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.pn.2017.1b16. Accessed 03 July 2019
- 58.Chéileachair CN (2017) Instagram and the regulation of eating disorder communities [internet]. Bill of health: examining the intersection of health law, biotechnology, and bioethics. http://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2017/10/20/instagram-and-the-regulation-of-eating-disorder-communities/. Accessed 24 Sept 2019
- 59.Alexander A (2019) Instagram will restrict who can see posts about cosmetic procedures, weight loss products [internet]. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/18/20872711/instagram-weight-loss-cosmetic-procedures-restrictions-policy-wellness-influencer-marketing. Accessed 24 Sept 2019