Advertisement

#Orthorexia on Instagram: a descriptive study exploring the online conversation and community using the Netlytic software

  • Sara Santarossa
  • Jillian Lacasse
  • Jordan Larocque
  • Sarah J. Woodruff
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Orthorexia Nervosa

Abstract

Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a relatively new phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) the #orthorexia conversation on Instagram (using the Netlytic software), and (2) among a random subsample of images (N = 245), analyse the types of images (N = 145) and author biographies (N = 68). Among the 4,533 downloaded records, there were 48,780 unique words associated with the posts, with the most commonly used being love (n = 535) and #edrecovery (n = 425). Among the images, the majority contained food (68%) and people (13%). Among the unique authors, the majority were female (84%) and mentioned ED (eating disorder) recovery and being food/fitness focused. The ON community on Instagram is relatively small and the positive conversation may suggest a supportive community that focuses on recovery and adopting healthier eating behaviours.

Level of evidence Level V, descriptive study.

Keywords

Orthorexia Instagram Online social support Eating disorders Netlytic Hashtag 

Notes

Funding

No funding to report.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoek HW (2016) Review of the worldwide epidemiology of eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 29(6):336–339.  https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zamora M, Bonaechea B, Sanchez F et al (2005) Orthorexia nervosa: a new eating behaviour disorder? Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria 33(1):66–68 (PMID: 15704033) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brytek-Matera A (2012) Orthorexia nervosa–an eating disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder or disturbed eating habit. Arch Psychiatry Psychother 1(1):55–60Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moroze RM, Dunn TM, Holland JC et al (2015) Microthinking about micronutrients: a case of transition from obsessions about healthy eating to near-fatal “Orthorexia Nervosa” and proposed diagnostic criteria. Psychosomatics 56:397–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2014.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Musolino C, Warin M, Wade T et al (2015) ‘Healthy anorexia’: the complexity of care in disordered eating. Soc Sci Med 1:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nianias H (2015) ‘Eat clean’? The smug Instagram lifestyle might not be so healthy after all [Internet]. https://www.vice.com/sv/article/why-your-eat-clean-lifestyle-might-not-be-so-healthy-after-all-252. Accessed 27 Feb 2018
  7. 7.
    Koven NS, Abry AW (2015) The clinical basis of orthorexia nervosa: emerging perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 11:385–394.  https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S61665 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunn TM, Gibbs J, Whitney N et al (2017) Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa is less than 1%: data from a US sample. Eat Weight Disord St 22(1):185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0258-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Łucka I, Janikowska-Hołoweńko D, Domarecki P et al (2018) Orthorexia nervosa–a separate clinical entity, a part of eating disorder spectrum or another manifestation of obsessive-compulsive disorder? Psychiatr Pol ONLINE FIRST Nr 97:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/85729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alvarenga M, Martins M, Sato K et al (2012) Orthorexia nervosa behavior in a sample of Brazilian dietitians assessed by the Portuguese version of ORTO-15. Eat Weight Disord ST 17:e29–e35 (PMID: 22751269) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bratman S, Knight D (2000) Health food junkies: orthorexia nervosa– overcoming the obsession with healthful eating. Broadway, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sánchez FG, Rial BR (2005) Orthorexia nervosa: a new eating behavior disorder? Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria 33(1):66–68Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnes MA, Caltabiano ML (2017) The interrelationship between orthorexia nervosa, perfectionism, body image and attachment style. Eat Weight Disord ST 22(1):177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0280-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barthels F, Meyer F, Huber T et al (2017) Orthorexic eating behaviour as a coping strategy in patients with anorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord ST 22(2):269–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0329-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Segura-Garcia C, Ramacciotti C, Rania M et al (2015) The prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among eating disorder patients after treatment. Eat Weight Disord ST 20(2):161–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-014-0171-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costa CB, Hardan-Khalil K, Gibbs K (2017) Orthorexia nervosa: a review of the literature. Issues Ment Health Nurs 38(12):980–988.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2017.1371816 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borgida A (2012) In sickness and in health: orthorexia nervosa, the study of obsessive healthy eating [dissertation]. Alliant International University, San Francisco BayGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson CC, Mazzeo SE (2017) Attitudes toward orthorexia nervosa relative to DSM-5 eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 50(7):781–792.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22710 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Juarascio AS, Shoaib A, Timko CA (2010) Pro-eating disorder communities on social networking sites: a content analysis. Eat Disord 18(5):393–407.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2010.511918 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borzekowski DL, Schenk S, Wilson JL et al (2010) E-Ana and e-Mia: a content analysis of pro-eating disorder Web sites. Am J Public Health 100(8):1526–1534.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.172700 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Norris ML, Boydell KM, Pinhas L et al (2009) Ana and the Internet: a review of pro-anorexia websites. Int J Eat Disord 39(6):443–447.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7(2):117–140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M et al (1999) Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tiggemann M (2011) Sociocultural perspectives on human appearance and body image. In: Cash TF, Smolak L (eds) Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. Guilford, New York, pp 12–19Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewallen J (2016) When Image isn’t everything: the effect of Instagram frames on social comparison. Soc Media Soc 5(2):108–133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morrison TG, Kalin R, Morrison MA (2004) Body-image evaluation and body-image investment among adolescents: a test of sociocultural and social comparison theories. Adolescence 39(155):571–592 (PMID: 15673231)s PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Brien K (2015) The cultivation of eating disorders through Instagram [master’s thesis]. University of South Florida, Tampa (FL)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tiggemann M, Zaccardo M (2015) “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: the effect of fitspiration imagery on women’s body image. Body Image 15:61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carrotte ER, Vella AM, Lim MS (2015) Predictors of “liking” three types of health and fitness-related content on social media: a cross-sectional study. JMIR 17(8):205.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghaznavi J, Taylor LD (2015) Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: an analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image 14:54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Santarossa S, Coyne P, Lisinski C et al (2016) #fitspo on Instagram: a mixed-methods approach using Netlytic and photo analysis, uncovering the online discussion and author/image characteristics. J Health Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316676334 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holland G, Tiggemann M (2016) A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image 17:100–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanner E (2015) Girls, Instagram, and the glamorization of self-loathing. Dissent Voices 4(1):10. https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/dissentingvoices/vol4/iss1/10. Accessed 27 Feb 2018.
  34. 34.
    Holland G, Tiggemann M (2017) “Strong beats skinny every time”: disordered eating and compulsive exercise in women who post fitspiration on Instagram. Int J Eat Disord 50(1):76–79.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22559 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Corning AF, Krumm AJ, Smitham LA (2006) Differential social comparison processes in women with and without eating disorder symptoms. J Couns Psychol 53(3):338.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tiggemann M, McGill B (2004) The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. J Soc Clin Psychol 23(1):23.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.1.23.26991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Turner PG, Lefevre CE (2017) Instagram use is linked to increased symptoms of orthorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord 23(2):277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sturgis I (2015) Orthorexia: the clean eating obsession that makes you dangerously ill. The Telegraph [Internet]. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/wellbeing/health-advice/orthorexia-the-clean-eating-obsession-that-makes-you-dangerously/. Assessed 27 Feb 2018
  39. 39.
    Gruzd A (2016) Netlytic: software for automated text and social network analysis [online software]Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tiggemann M, Zaccardo M (2016) ‘Strong is the new skinny’: a content analysis of# fitspiration images on Instagram. J Health Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316639436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stuckey HL (2015) The second step in data analysis: coding qualitative research data. J Soc Health Diabetes 3(1):7.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.140875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, Koole M et al (2006) Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. Internet High Educ 9(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Webb JB, Vinoski ER, Bonar AS et al (2017) Fat is fashionable and fit: a comparative content analysis of Fatspiration and Health at Every Size® Instagram images. Body Image 22:53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.05.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Veale HJ, Sacks-Davis R, Weaver ER et al (2015) The use of social networking platforms for sexual health promotion: Identifying key strategies for successful user engagement. BMC Public Health 15(1):85.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1396-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pagoto SL, Baker K, Griffith J et al (2016) Engaging moms on teen indoor tanning through social media: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 5(4):e228.  https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6624 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chou WYS, Prestin A, Lyons C et al (2013) Web 2.0 for health promotion: Reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health 103(1):e9–e18.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301071 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Merchant G, Weibel N, Pina L et al (2017) Face-to-face and online networks: college students’ experiences in a weight-loss trial. J Health Commun 22(1):75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1250847 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schlesselman-Tarango G (2013) Searchable signatures: context and the struggle for recognition. Inform Technol Libr 32(3):5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Linstead S, Pullen A (2006) Gender as multiplicity: desire, displacement, difference and dispersion. Hum Relat 59(9):1287–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706069772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations