What are you losing it for? Weight suppression motivations in undergraduates
Accumulating evidence suggests weight suppression (WS) is related to disordered eating and eating disorder (ED) risk in non-clinical samples; however, research to-date has not examined the intentionality of, or motivations for, WS. The purpose of this study was to: (1) qualitatively assess WS motivation in undergraduates, and (2) explore differences in body image and eating behaviors across motivation categories.
In the first study, responses from 192 undergraduates were evaluated using inductive content analysis; four primary motivation categories emerged: appearance, functional, sports/military, and unintentional. In a second study, 1033 undergraduates indicated their primary WS motivation, if applicable, and completed body image and eating behavior measures. Separate analyses were run by gender; covariates included current body mass index (BMI) and WS.
Differences in body image and eating behaviors emerged across motivation categories for both men (p < 0.001) and women (p < 0.001). Appearance-motivated WS in men, and appearance and sports/military-motivated WS in women, were related to greater body dissatisfaction, restraint, thin-ideal internalization, and ED risk. Undergraduates with intentional WS demonstrated higher body dissatisfaction and eating pathology than undergraduates with unintentional or no WS (all ps < 0.05).
Assessing weight history and WS motivations could be a brief, low-cost intervention to improve identification of undergraduates at greatest risk for EDs. This information could be integrated into campus marketing campaigns promoting wellness.
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional descriptive study, Level V.
KeywordsWeight suppression Undergraduates Body image Disordered eating
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Both phases of the project were approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the university where the research was conducted. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- 1.Gorrell S, Reilly EE, Schaumberg K et al (2018) Weight suppression and its relation to eating disorder and weight outcomes: A narrative review. Eat Disord 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2018.1499297
- 4.Lebow J, Sim L (2017) Anorexia nervosa with a history of obesity or overweight. In: Anderson LK, Murray SB, Kaye WH (eds) Clinical handbook of complex and atypical eating disorders. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 169–188Google Scholar
- 19.Cheskin LJ, Donze LF (2001) Appearance vs health as motivators for weight loss. JAMA 286:2160. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.17.2160-JMS1107-4-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Levy AS, Heaton AW (1993) Weight control practices of US adults trying to lose weight. Ann Intern Med 119:661. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_Part_2-199310011-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Putterman E, Linden W (2004) Appearance versus health: does the reason for dieting affect dieting behavior? J Behav Med 27:185–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000019851.37389.a7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Benau EM, Plumhoff J, Timko CA (2018) Women’s dieting goals (weight loss, weight maintenance, or not dieting) predict exercise motivation, goals, and engagement in undergraduate women: a self-determination theory framework. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2017.1421683
- 29.Smith A, Anderson M (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
- 41.Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ (2008) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0). In: Fairburn CG (ed) Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press, New York, pp 309–313Google Scholar
- 53.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ (2016) Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 57.Cohen J (1969) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 58.Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M (2016) Social media update 2016Google Scholar
- 62.Simpson CC, Mazzeo SE (2016) Skinny is not enough: a content analysis of fitspiration on Pinterest. Health Commun 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1140273