Personality traits and dysfunctional construal of online health promotion messages

  • Yaeeun LeeEmail author
  • John E. Kurtz
Original Article



With the Internet becoming increasingly popular as a source of information, blogs offering healthy lifestyle techniques and knowledge have become popular and accessible. Despite their focus on health, these blogs portray content that may be negatively construed by viewers, especially those with or at risk for eating disorders. The present study investigated changes in affect and self-esteem after viewing a prototypic health blog. Personality traits, specifically neuroticism and conscientiousness, were also investigated.


A prototypic health blog was constructed after extensive review of existing blogs. A parallel format was then followed to create a home décor website for a control condition. Female undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of two blog sites, and participants completed an earlier personality assessment and post-viewing study questionnaires.


Contrary to the hypothesis that readers of the health blog will report more negative outcomes, no main effect of blog condition was found. However, individuals high in trait neuroticism experienced greater differences in negative affect, but not self-esteem, when viewing the health blog versus the control blog.


This study found that viewing health blogs did not have immediate effects on affect and self-esteem, but more neurotic individuals were more inclined to experience negative affect when viewing health promotion messages. Personality traits assessed prior to the experiment were more predictive of negative affect and self-esteem during the experiment than blog viewing conditions.

No level of evidence, experimental study.


Health blogs Personality Neuroticism Conscientiousness Negative affect Self-esteem 


Compliance with ethical standards


No funding has been received for the current study.

Conflict of interest

Both authors, Yaeeun Lee and Dr. John E. Kurtz, declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    King TK, Matacin M, White KS, Marcus BH (2005) A prospective examination of body image and smoking cessation in women. Body Image 2:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson RE, Latner JD, Hayashi K (2013) More than just body weight: the role of body image in psychological and physical functioning. Body Image 10:644–647. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.04.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davison TE, McCabe MP (2005) Relationships between men’s and women’s body image and their psychological, social, and sexual functioning. Sex Roles 52:463–475. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3712-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mond J, van den Berg P, Boutelle K, Hannan P, Neumark-Sztainer D (2011) Obesity, body dissatisfaction and emotional well-being in early and late adolescence: findings from the project EAT study. J Adolesc Health 48:373–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paxton SJ, Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Eisenberg ME (2006) Body dissatisfaction prospectively predicts depressive mood and low self-esteem in adolescent girls and boys. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 35:539–549. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stice E, Chase A, Stormer S, Appel A (2011) A randomized trial of dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program. Int J Ear Disord 29:247–262. doi: 10.1002/eat.1016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stice E, Mazotti L, Weibel D, Agras WS (2000) Dissonance prevention program decreases thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, dieting, negative affect, and bulimic symptoms: a preliminary experiment. Int J Ear Disord 27:206–217. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(200003)27:2<206::AID-EAT9>3.0.CO;2-D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wertheim EH, Koerner J, Paxton SJ (2001) Longitudinal predictors of restrictive eating and bulimic tendencies in three different age groups of adolescent girls. J Youth Adolesc 30:69–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1005224921891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabe S, Ward LM, Hyde JS (2008) The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychol Bull 134:460–476. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaye BK (2005) It’s a blog, blog, blog world: users and uses of weblogs. Atl J Commun 13:73–96. doi: 10.1207/s15456889ajc1302_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harper K, Sperry S, Thompson JK (2008) Viewership of pro-eating disorder websites: association with body image and eating disturbances. Int J Eat Disord 41:92–95. doi: 10.1002/eat.20408 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bardone-Cone AM, Cass KM (2007) What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. Int J Eat Disord 40:537–548. doi: 10.1002/eat.20396 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delforterie MJ, Larsen JK, Bardon-Cone AM, Scholte RH (2014) Effects of viewing a pro-ana website: an experimental study on body satisfaction, affect, and appearance self-efficacy. Eat Disord 22:321–336. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2014.898982 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rains SA (2007) Perceptions of traditional information sources and uses of the World Wide Web to seek health information: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Health Commun 12:667–680. doi: 10.1080/10810730701619992 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boepple L, Thompson JK (2014) A content analysis of healthy living blogs: evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. Int J Eat Disord 47:362–367. doi: 10.1002/eat.22244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friedman HS, Kern ML (2014) Personality, well-being, and health. Annu Rev Psychol 65:719–742. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCrae RR, Costa PT, de Lima MP, Simoes A et al (1999) Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures. Dev Psychol 35:466–477. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.466 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS (2005) The relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: a meta-analysis. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 27:101–113. doi: 10.1007/s10862-005-5384-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diaz-Marsa M, Luis J, Saiz J (2000) A study of temperament and personality in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. J Pers Disord 14:352–359. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.352 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller JL, Schmidt LA, Vaillancourt T, McDougall P, Laliberte M (2006) Neuroticism and introversion: a risky combination for disordered eating among a non-clinical sample of undergraduate women. Eat Behav 7:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.07.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rush CC, Becker SJ, Curry JF (2009) Personality factors and styles among college students who binge eat and drink. Psychol Addict Behav 23:140–145. doi: 10.1037/a0013167 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacLaren VV, Best LA (2010) Nonsuicidal self-injury, potentially addictive behaviors, and the five factor model in undergraduates. Personal Individ Differ 49:521–525. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keller C, Siegrist M (2015) Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects. Appetite 84:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Groesz LM, McCoy S, Carl J, Saslow L et al (2012) What is eating you? Stress and the drive to eat. Appetite 58:717–721. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stroebe W, Van Koningsbruggen GM, Papies EK, Aarts H (2013) Why most dieters fail but some succeed: a goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychol Rev 120:110–138. doi: 10.1037/a0030849 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raynor DA, Levine H (2009) Associations between the five-factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. J Am Coll Health 58:73–81. doi: 10.3200/JACH.58.1.73-82 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Previn LA, John OP (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 102–138Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crawford JR, Henry JD (2004) The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 43:245–265. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH (2001) Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 27:151–161. doi: 10.1177/0146167201272002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orth U, Robins RW, Widaman KF (2012) Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. J Personal Soc Psychol 102:1271–1288. doi: 10.1037/a0025558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Beer A, Watson D, McDade-Montez E (2013) Self-other agreement and assumed similarity in neuroticism, extraversion, and trait affect: distinguishing the effects of form and content. Assessment 20:723–737. doi: 10.1177/1073191113500521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Verduyn P, Brans K (2012) The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism, and aspects of trait affect. Personal Individ Differ 52:664–669. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Merz EL, Roesch SC (2011) Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data. J Res Personal 45:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Donnellan MB, Kenny DA, Trzensniewski KH, Lucas RE, Conger RD (2012) Using trait-state models to evaluation the longitudinal consistency of global self-esteem from adolescence to adulthood. J Res Personal 46:634–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kling KC, Hyde JS, Showers CJ, Buswell BN (1999) Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 125:470–500. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.470 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Robins RW, Trzensniewski KH, Tracy JL, Gosling SD, Potter J (2002) Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychol Aging 17:423–434. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.423 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boepple L, Thomspon JK (2016) A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. Int J Eat Disord 49:98–101. doi: 10.1002/eat.22403 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tiggemann M, Zaccardo M (2015) “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: the effect of fitspiration image on women’s body image. Body Image 15:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Garner DM (2004) Eating Disorder Inventory-3 professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rush CC, Becker SJ, Curry JF (2009) Personality factors and styles among college students who binge eat and drink. Psychol Addic Behav 23:140–145. doi: 10.1037/a0013167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roberts A, Good E (2010) Media images and female body dissatisfaction: the moderating effects of the Five-Factor traits. Eat Behav 11:211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.04.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ferguson CJ (2013) In the eye of the beholder: thin-ideal media affects some, but not most, viewers in the a meta-analytic review of body dissatisfaction in women and men. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2:20–37. doi: 10.1037/a0030766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations