Social safeness and disordered eating: Exploring underlying mechanisms of body appreciation and inflexible eating
- 222 Downloads
Feelings of social safeness and connectedness have been associated with adaptive emotion regulation processes and well-being indicators. Further, literature has demonstrated that interpersonal experiences play an important role in the etiology and maintenance of body and eating psychopathology. However, the study of the role of social variables and emotion regulation processes in the engagement in inflexible eating rules and eating psychopathology is still in its early stages. The current study aims to fill some gaps within the literature and explore the mediator role of body appreciation and inflexible eating rules in the link between social safeness and disordered eating. Participants were 253 women, aged between 18 and 50 years old, who completed a series of online self-report measures. Results from the tested path analysis model showed that social safeness holds a significant effect on eating psychopathology, through the mechanisms of body appreciation and inflexible eating rules. Also, results suggested that women who present higher levels of social safeness tend to present a more positive and respectful attitude towards their body and decreased adoption of inflexible eating rules, which seem to explain lower levels of disordered eating behaviours. These findings seem to present empirical support for the development of intervention programs that promote a positive, affectionate and healthy relationship with one’s body image, in order to prevent the inflexible adherence to eating rules and disordered eating behaviours.
KeywordsSocial safeness Body appreciation Inflexible eating rules Disordered eating
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest.
- 1.Gilbert P (2010) Compassion focused therapy: distinctive features. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gilbert P, McEwan K, Mitra R, Richter A, Franks L, Mills A, Bellew R, Gale C (2009) An exploration of different types of positive affect in students and in patients with bipolar disorders. Clin Neuropsychiatry 6(4):135–143Google Scholar
- 4.Gilbert P (2005) Compassion and cruelty: a biopsychosocial approach. In: Gilbert P (ed) Compassion: conceptualisation, research and use in psychotherapy. Routledge, London, pp 9–74Google Scholar
- 7.Goss K, Gilbert P (2002) Eating disorders, shame and pride: a cognitive-behavioural functional analysis. In: Gilbert P, Miles J (eds) Body shame: Conceptualization, research and treatment. Brunner-Routledge, Hove, pp 219–255Google Scholar
- 14.Gilbert P (2007) The evolution of shame as a marker for relationship security: a biopsychosocial approach. In: Tracy J, Robin R, Tangney J (eds) The self-conscious emotions: theory and research. Guilford, New York, pp 283–309Google Scholar
- 27.Kelly AC, Vimalakanthan K, Carter JC (2014) Understanding the roles of self-esteem, self-compassion, and fear of self-compassion in eating disorder pathology: an examination of female students and eating disorder patients. Eat Behav 15(3):388–391. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.04.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Poínhos R, Franchini B, Afonso C, Correia F, Teixeira VH, Moreira P, Durão C, Pinho O, Silva D, Lima Reis JP, Veríssimo T, de Almeida MDV (2009) Alimentação e estilos de vida da população Portuguesa: metodologia e resultados preliminares [Alimentation and life styles of the Portuguese population: methodology and preliminary results]. Alimentação Humana 15(3):43–60Google Scholar
- 34.Marta-Simões J, Mendes L, Trindade I, Ferreira C.(2016) Validation of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 for Portuguese women. Poster presented at the 3rd IPLeiria’s International Health Congress, LeiriaGoogle Scholar
- 35.Duarte C, Ferreira C, Trindade I, Pinto-Gouveia J. (2015) The backlash of inflexible eating rules: development and validation of a new measure of eating-related inflexibility. Poster session presented at the meeting of the 45th EABCT Congress, Jerusalem, IsraelGoogle Scholar
- 36.Fairburn C, Beglin S (1994) Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?. Int J Eat Disord 16:363–370. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(199412)16:4<363::AID-EAT2260160405>3.0.CO;2-#Google Scholar
- 39.Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 40.Arbuckle J (2006) Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer program]. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 41.Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 42.Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6(1):53–60Google Scholar
- 43.Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 44.Field A (2004) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar