Crucial conversations about weight management with healthcare providers: patients’ perspectives and experiences
- 255 Downloads
To elicit patient experiences of weight management discussions with providers and provide recommendations for future weight-related discussions.
1000 patients who recently saw their provider for non-weight specific appointments were mailed measures of demographics, self-reported height and weight, activity level, adherence, perceptions of and recommendations for weight-related discussions, and internalized weight bias. This study was primarily descriptive and utilized a mixed method design including collection of quantitative and qualitative data.
242 patients responded (24 % response rate); 32.4 % overweight (N = 72), 41.9 % obese (N = 93). 47 % of overweight and 71 % of obese patients recalled that their provider discussed weight; 92 % were motivated to follow recommendations and 89 % felt confident doing so. Most patients (75 %) would like their provider to be “very direct/straightforward” when discussing weight, and 52 % would be “not at all offended” if they were diagnosed as “overweight/obese.” Most patients (63 %) reported being “extremely comfortable” discussing weight with providers. Patients with higher BMI had higher levels of internalized weight bias (p < .001) and wanted their provider to “discuss weight sensitively” (p < .05).
This study suggests that patients have important preferences that providers should be mindful of when discussing weight. While these discussions can be challenging, most patients report that they would be comfortable having these conversations directly and most would have enhanced motivation and confidence following these conversations. Communicating about weight is needed and desired by patients; doing so sensitively with those at higher weight is essential.
KeywordsObesity Weight management Communication
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by the Mayo Clinic Department of Medicine.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Jensen MD et al (2014) 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(25 Pt B):2985–3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Smith AW, Borowski LA, Liu B, Galuska DA, Signore C, Klabunde C, Huang TT, Krebs-Smith SM, Frank E, Pronk N, Ballard-Barbash R (2011) U.S. primary care physicians’ diet-, physical activity-, and weight-related care of adult patients. Am J Prev Med 41(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Post RE, Mainous AG 3rd, Gregorie SH, Knoll ME, Diaz VA, Saxena SK (2011) The influence of physician acknowledgment of patients’ weight status on patient perceptions of overweight and obesity in the United States. Arch Intern Med 171(4):316–321. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.549 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Singh S, Somers VK, Clark MM, Vickers K, Hensrud DD, Korenfeld Y, Lopez-Jimenez F (2010) Physician diagnosis of overweight status predicts attempted and successful weight loss in patients with cardiovascular disease and central obesity. Am Heart J 160(5):934–942. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.023 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Godin G (2011) The Godin–Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire. Health Fit J Can 4(1):18–22Google Scholar
- 23.Amireault S, Godin G (2015) The Godin–Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire: validity evidence supporting its use for classifying healthy adults into active and insufficiently active categories. Percept Mot Skills 120(2):604–622. doi: 10.2466/03.27.PMS.120v19x7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hayes RD (1992) The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) measures of patient adherence. http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_adherence_survey.pdf
- 33.UConn Rudd Center For Food Policy and Obesity (2016). http://www.uconnruddcenter.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2016