Advertisement

Is problematic internet use an indicator of eating disorders among Turkish university students?

  • Çiğdem Berber Çelik
  • Hatice Odacı
  • Nihal Bayraktar
Original Article

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between problematic internet use and eating attitudes in a group of university students.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 314 students attending programs at the faculties of education, medicine and communications at the Karadeniz Technical University in Turkey. One hundred forty-seven (46.8 %) were male and 167 (53.2 %) female. The Problematic Internet Use Scale was used to measure problematic internet use levels among university students and the Eating Attitudes Test to determine anorexia nervosa symptoms. Additionally, a Personal Data Form was used to determine age, gender, faculty attended and computer ownership. Data were analyzed on SPSS 15.00. Pearson’s product moments correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression analysis, the independent t test and one-way ANOVA were used for data analysis.

Results

The research findings showed that 46.8 % of students were female and 53.2 % male. Mean age was 20.65 (SD 1.42). Analysis showed a significant positive correlation between problematic internet use and eating attitudes (r = 0.77, p < 0.01). Problematic internet use was found to be a significant predictor of eating attitudes. The results also showed a significant difference in problematic internet use with regard to program variables [F (2,311) = 102.79]. There were no significant differences in problematic internet use in terms of gender or computer ownership.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that problematic internet use is significantly correlated with eating disorders, that problematic internet use does not vary on the basis of gender or computer ownership and that variations arise in problematic internet use depending on the faculty attended.

Keywords

Problematic internet use Eating attitudes University students Gender 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Özcan NK, Buzlu S (2007) Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. Cyberpsychology Behav 10:767–772. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkhaldi MA, AlJabri IM (1998) The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: new evidence from a developing nation. Comput Hum Behav 14:23–42. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00030-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong L, Phillips JG, Saling LL (2000) Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. Int J Hum Comput Stud 53:537–550. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis R (2001) A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Comput Hum Behav 17:187–195. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Internet World Stats (2013) World internet statistics. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  6. 6.
    Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA (2007) An investigation of problematic internet usage behaviors on Turkish university students. In: Proceedings of 7th international educational technology (IETC) conference book. Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, pp 115–120. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED500186
  7. 7.
    Odacı H, Kalkan M (2010) Problematic internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Comput Educ 55:1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Odacı H (2011) Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students. Comput Educ 57:1109–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalbudak E, Evren C, Topcu M, Aldemir S, Coskun KS, Bozkurt M, Evren B, Canbal M (2013) Relationship of Internet addiction with impulsivity and severity of psychopathology among Turkish university students. Psychiatry Res 210:1086–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odacı H, Berber Çelik Ç (2012) Relationship between university students’ problematic internet use and their academic self-efficacy, academic procrastination, and eating attitudes. J New World Sci Acad 7:389–403. http://web.firat.edu.tr/icits2011/papers/27631.pdf
  11. 11.
    Odacı H (2013) The role of computer self-efficacy, self-esteem, and subjective well-being in predicting research self-efficacy among postgraduate students. Asia Pac Educ Res 22:399–406. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0039-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odacı H (2013) Risk-taking behavior and academic self-efficacy as variables accounting for problematic internet use in adolescent university students. Child Youth Serv Rev 35:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aboujaoude E (2010) Problematic internet use: an overview. World Psychiatr 9:85–90. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00278.x Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young KS (2004) Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. Am Behav Sci 48:402–415. doi: 10.1177/0002764204270278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubey RW, Lavin MJ, Barrows JR (2001) Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: early findings. J Commun 51:366–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin SSJ, Tsai CC (2002) Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 18:411–426. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00056-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P (2000) Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Comput Hum Behav 16:13–29. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shapira NA, Lessig MC, Goldsmith TD, Szabo ST, Lazoritz M, Gold MS, Stein DJ (2003) Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety 17:207–216. doi: 10.1002/da.10094 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odacı H, Berber Çelik Ç (2013) Who are problematic internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic internet use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and self-perception. Comput Hum Behav 29:2382–2387. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Odacı H, Çıkrıkçı Ö (2014) Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Comput Hum Behav 32:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Block JJ (2008) Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. Am J Psychiatry 165:306–307. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shapira NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE, Khosla UM, McElroy SL (2000) Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. J Affect Disord 57:267–272. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00107-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CS, Chen CC, Yen CF (2008) Psychiatric comorbidity of Internet addiction in college students: an interview study. CNS Spectr 13:147–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phillips JG, Ogeil RP, Blaszczynski A (2012) Electronic interests and behaviours associated with gambling problems. Int J Ment Health Addict 10:585–596. doi: 10.1007/s11469-011-9356-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Wu HY, Yang MJ (2007) The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, depression, social phobia and hostility. J Adolesc Health 41:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bernardi S, Pallanti S (2009) Internet addiction: a descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Compr Psychiatr 50:510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weidman AC, Fernandez KC, Levinson CA, Augustine AA, Larsen RJ, Rodebaugh TL (2012) Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personal Individ Differ 53:191–195. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park SM, Park YA, Lee HW, Jung HY, Lee JY, Choi JS (2013) The effects of behavioral inhibition/approach system as predictors of Internet addiction in adolescents. Personal Individ Difffer 54:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CC, Chen SH, Yen CF (2005) Proposed diagnostic criteria of internet addiction for adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis 193:728–733. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000185891.13719.54 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kichler JC, Crowther JH (2009) Young girls’ eating attitudes and body image dissatisfaction: associations with communication and modeling. J Early Adolesc 29:212–232. doi: 10.1177/0272431608320121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shroff H, Thompson JK (2006) Peer influences, body-image dissatisfaction, eating dysfunction and self-esteem in adolescent girls. J Health Psychol 11:533–551. doi: 10.1177/1359105306065015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keski-Rahkonen A, Viken RJ, Kaprio J, Rissanen A, Rose RJ (2004) Genetic and environmental factors in breakfast eating patterns. Behav Genet 34:503–514. doi: 10.1023/B:BEGE.0000038488.22974.b1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Keski-Rahkonen A, Hoek HW, Susser ES, Linna MS, Sihvola E, Raevuori A, Bulik CM, Kaprio J, Rissanen A (2007) Epidemiology and course of anorexia nervosa in the community. Am J Psychiatry 164:1259–1265. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06081388 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Becker AE, Grinspoon SK, Klibanski A, Herzog DB (1999) Eating disorders. N Engl J Med 340:1092–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bizuel C, Brun JM, Rigaud D (2003) Depression influences the EDI scores in anorexia nervosa patients. Eur Psychiatry 18:119–123. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(03)00033-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tao ZL, Liu Y (2009) Is there a relationship between Internet dependence and eating disorders? A comparison study of Internet dependents and non-Internet dependents. Eat Weight Disord 14:e77–e83. doi: 10.1007/BF03327803 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen PH (2013) The effects of college students’ in-class and after-class lecture note-taking on academic performance. Asia Pac Educ Res 22:173–180. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0010-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA, Gürcan A (2007) The validity and reliability of the Problematic Internet Usage Scale. ESTP 7:411–416. https://www.edam.com.tr/kuyeb/pdf/en/06310a2407aae70697500de2f74cfccbaneng.pdf
  39. 39.
    Garner DM, Garfinkel PE (1979) The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychol Med 9:273–279. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700030762 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Savaşır I, Erol N (1989) Yeme Tutum Testi: Anoreksi Nervoza Belirtileri İndeksi. J Psychol 7:19–25 (Article in Turkish)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CS, Chen CC (2012) The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. Eur Psychiatry 27:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mathy RM, Cooper A (2003) The duration and frequency of internet use in a nonclinical sample: suicidality, behavioral problems and treatment histories. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train 40:125–135. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1/2.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Black DW, Belsare G, Schlosser S (1999) Clinical features, psychiatric comorbidity, and health-related quality of life in persons reporting compulsive computer use behavior. J Clin Psychiatry 60:839–844. http://www.psychiatrist.com/JCP/article/Pages/1999/v60n12/v60n1206.aspx
  44. 44.
    Hall AS, Parsons J (2001) Internet addiction: college student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. J Ment Health Couns 23:312–317Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hardie E, Tee MY (2007) Excessive internet use: the role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. AJETS 5:34–47. http://www.swinburne.edu.au/hosting/ijets/journal/V5N1/pdf/Article3_Hardie.pdf
  46. 46.
    Hawi NS (2012) Internet addiction among adolescents in Lebanon. Comput Hum Behav 28:1044–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Leung L, Lee PSN (2012) The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media Soc 14:117–136. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chou C, Tsai CC (2002) Developing web-based curricula: issues and challenges. J Curric Stud 34:623–636. doi: 10.1080/00220270210141909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chuang SC, Tsai CC (2005) Preferences toward the constructivist internet-based learning environments among high school students in Taiwan. Comput Hum Behav 21:255–272. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Houle PA (1996) Toward understanding student differences in a computer skill course. J Educ Comput Res 14:25–48. doi: 10.2190/C06X-G9UQ-6BUB-YPTY CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scherer K (1997) College life online: healthy and unhealthy internet use. J Coll Stud Dev 38:655–664Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Çiğdem Berber Çelik
    • 1
  • Hatice Odacı
    • 1
  • Nihal Bayraktar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Science Education, Fatih Faculty of EducationKaradeniz Technical UniversitySöğütlü, TrabzonTurkey
  2. 2.Akçaabat Anatolian Hospitality and Tourism Vocational High SchoolSöğütlü, TrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations