Impact of social pressure on stereotypes about obese people

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to test the effects of different types of influence on the expression of stereotypes towards people who are obese. It was hypothesized that public social pressure would more significantly impact the expression of stereotypes towards obese people than other types of influence.

Methods

One-hundred fifty-eight undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions or a control condition. Participants completed measures of stereotypes towards obese people prior to and after receiving manipulated feedback depicting purported stereotypes possessed by others (anonymously or publically) or scientific information about the base rates of these stereotypical traits in the obese population (i.e., trait prevalence). Participants also completed a measure of weight bias unrelated to the manipulated feedback.

Results

Explicit beliefs were influenced more when people perceived that others’ views were inconsistent with their own in a public setting than an anonymous setting or when they received trait prevalence feedback. However, levels of weight bias on a separate measure were unchanged.

Conclusion

Strong, public manipulations of social feedback have great potential to impact, at least, the short-term expression of stereotypes towards obese people.

Keywords

Weight stigma Weight bias Social pressure Attitudes change 

References

  1. 1.
    Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17(5):1–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asch SE (1952) Social psychology. Prentice Halls, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turner JC (1991) Social influence. Open University Press, Milton KeyesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stangor C, Sechrist GB, Jost JT (2001) Changing beliefs by providing consensus information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27:486–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haslam SA, Oakes P, McGarty C, Turner JC, Reynolds KJ, Eggins RA (1996) Stereotyping and social influence: the mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by the views of in-group and out-group members. Br J Soc Psychol 35:369–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sechrist GB, Stangor C (2001) Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(4):645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Puhl RM, Schwartz M, Brownell KD (2005) Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol 24(5):517–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crandall CS (1994) Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(5):882–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinn DM, Crocker J (2000) Social stigma and the self: meanings, situations, and self-esteem. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG (eds) The social psychology of stigma. Guilford Press, New York, pp 153–183Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis R, Cash TF, Jacobi L, Bubb-Lewis C (1997) Prejudice towards fat people: the development and validation of the anti-fat attitudes test. Obes Res 5:297–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teachman BA, Gapinkski K, Brownell KD, Rawlins M, Jeyaram S (2003) Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychol 22:68–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J (1988) An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Pers Soc Psychol 55(5):738–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL (2002) Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:62–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bessenhoff GR, Sherman JW (2000) Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cogn 18:329–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen AR (1962) An experiment on small rewards for discrepant compliance and attitude change. In: Brehm JW, Cohen AR (eds) Explorations in cognitive dissonance. Wiley, New York, pp 73–78Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zitek EM, Hebl MR (2007) The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time. J Exp Soc Psychol 43(867):876Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations