Advertisement

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Adsorption and Biomass: Current Interconnections and Future Challenges

  • M. DickoEmail author
  • M. Guilmont
  • F. Lamari
Biomass and Biofuels (P Fokaides, Section Editor)
  • 63 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Biomass and Biofuels

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The present study focuses on investigating the interconnections between adsorption technology and biomass energy production processes. A critical review on the different roles and perspectives of adsorption in these processes and on the potential of biochar as a solid bio-sorbent is investigated.

Recent Findings

Adsorption plays a role in CO2 capture as a purification final step and can be viable for capture at low to medium scale. Promising materials and processes are proposed in the literature. Biochar produced from biomass pyrolysis shows properties comparable with commercialized adsorbents.

Summary

Adsorption in biomass associated with carbon capture and storage (Bio-CCS) is expected to grow if new adsorbents and processes are performant at larger scale. New biomass-based processes involving adsorption can be developed; methanation coupled with methanization is one of them. Biochar is technologically ready for water depollution and soil amendment but further work is needed for CO2 capture applications. These challenges will necessitate adapted policies and R&D to decrease the production costs. Industrial exploitation of biomass necessitates interdisciplinary work.

Keywords

Biomass Adsorption Carbon capture and storage Biochar 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

M. Dicko, M. Guilmont, F. Lamari declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014), Climate Change 2014, Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. IPCC plays a major role as its predictions and recommendation are the starting point of most policies, reflections, etc. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    • Fuss S, Canadell JG, Peter GP, Tavoni M, Andrew RM, Ciais P, et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4:850–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392 A critical paper on climate change mitigation by negative emissions. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Kemper J. Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;40:401–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012 An extensive review on the global status of bio-CCS except the technical part. An inventory and description of worldwide bio-CSS projects. Complementary with the present review. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ZEP and EBTP, 2012. Biomass with CO2 capture and storage (bio-CCS). The way forward for Europe. Zero emissions platform and European biofuels technology platform.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    United Nations. Paris Agreement. Paris: United Nations; 2016. p. 1–27.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendiara T, Gayan P, Garcia-Labiano F, de Diego LF, Perez-Astray A, Izquierdo MT, et al. Chemical looping combustion of biomass: an approach to BECCS. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:6021–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bui M, Fajardy M, Mac DN. Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): opportunities for performance improvement. Fuel. 2018;213:164–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Broutin P, Lebas E, Lecomte F. CO2 capture technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. IFP Publications, 2010, ISBN : 9782710809487. A thorough book on CCS technologies and associated costs. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McLaren D. Procedural justice in carbon capture and storage. Energy Environ. 2012;23(2–3):345–64.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.23.2-3.345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nanda S, Mohanty P, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK. Physico-chemical properties of bio-oils from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with high and slow heating rate. Energy Environ Res. 2014;4:21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck D, Loos M, Meyer L. (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, UK. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chang (IPCC) 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ADEME Biotfuel Project http://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/biotfuel-2016.pdf; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bottoms RR. Process for Separating Acid Gases. 1933. US Patent n°18,958.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dicko M, Coquelet C, Jarne C, Northrop S, Richon D. Acid gases partial pressures above a 50 wt% aqueous methyldiethanolamine solution: experimental work and modeling. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010;289(2):99–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Du Y, Yuan Y, Rochelle GT. Review : Volatility of amines for CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2017;58:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Budzianows WM. Single solvents, solvent blends, and advanced solvent systems in CO2 capture by absorption: a review. Int J Global Warming. 2015;7:184.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2015.067749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruthven DM. Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dicko M, Lamari F, Levesque D. Molecular simulation of the selective adsorption of CO2 in combustion effluents. Récents Progrès en Génie des Procédés, Ed. SFGP, Paris 2013; 104:1–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee SY, Park SJ. A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;23:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levesque D, Lamari F. Pore geometry and isosteric heat: an analysis of carbon dioxide adsorption on activated carbon. Mol Phys. 2009;107(4–6):591–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970902905802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Hinkov I, Darkrim Lamari F, Langlois P, Dicko M, Chilev C, Pentchev I. Carbon dioxide capture by adsorption (review). J Chem Technol Metall. 2016;51(6):609–26 An interesting review on adsorbents and processes on development.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoro KO, Sekoai PT. The potential of CO2 capture and storage technology in South Africa’s coal-fired thermal power plants. Environments. 2016;3(3):24.  https://doi.org/10.3390/environments3030024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma J, Si C, Li Y, Li R. CO2 adsorption on zeolite X/activated carbon composites. Adsorption. 2012;18:503–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-012-9440-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weinberger BP, Darkrim Lamari F, Beyaz Kayiran S, Gicquel A, Levesque D. Molecular modeling of H2 purification on Na-LSX zeolite and experimental validation. AICHE J. 2005;51:142–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gray ML, Soong Y, Champagne KJ, Baltrus J, Stevens RW, Toochinda P, et al. CO2 capture by amine-enriched fly ash carbon sorbents. Sep Purif Technol. 2004;35(1):31–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00113-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ben Mansour R, Habib MA, Bamidele OE, Basha M, Qasem NAA, Peedikakkal A, et al. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations—a review. Appl Energy. 2016;161:225–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li Y, Ruan G, Jalilov AS, Tarkunde YR, Fei TJM. Biochar as a renewable source for high-performance CO2 sorbent. Carbon. 2016;107:344–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Querejeta N, Plaza MG, Rubiera F, Pevida C, Avery T, Tennisson SR. Carbon monoliths in adsorption-based post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2341–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plaza MG, Gonzalez AS, Pis JJ, Rubioera F, Pevida C. Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture. Appl Energy. 2014;114:551–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Trickett CA, Helal A, Bassem AM, Yamani ZH, Cordova KE, Yaghi OM. The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2:17045.  https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 This publication identifies the specific structural and chemical properties of MOFs that have led to the highest capture capacities, the most efficient separations and regeneration processes, and the most effective catalytic conversions. Benchmark on MOFs. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adhikari AK, Lin KS. Improving CO2 adsorption capacities and CO2/N2 separation efficiencies of MOF-74(Ni, CO) by doping palladium-containing activated carbon. Chem Eng J. 2016;284:1348–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Munusamy K, Sethia G, Patil DV, Somayajulu Rallapalli PB, Somani RS, Bajaj HC. Sorption of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen and carbon monoxide on MIL-101(Cr): volumetric measurements and dynamic adsorption studies. Chem Eng J. 2012;195-196:359–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Riboldi L, Bolland O. Overview on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as CO2 capture technology: state-of-the-art, Limits and Potentials. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2390–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1385 A critical article covering post-combustion and pre-combustion cases.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ghougassian PG, Pena Lopez JA, Manousiouthakis VI, Smirniotis P. CO2 capturing from power plant flue gases: energetic comparison of amine absorption with MgO based, heat integrated, pressure–temperature-swing adsorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2014;22:256–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    An H, Feng B, Sub S. CO2 capture by electrothermal swing adsorption with activated carbon fibre materials. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011;5:16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grande CA, Rodrigues AE. Electric swing adsorption for CO2 removal from flue gases. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2008;2:194–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00116-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee KB, Sircar S. Removal and recovery of compressed CO2 from flue gas by a novel thermal swing chemisorption process. AICHE J. 2008;54:2293–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Global CCS Institute, Electric Power Research Institute. CO2 capture technologies: Oxy-combustion with CO2 capture. Section 4. Report. 2012.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nuon Magnum project : https://www.power-technology.com/projects/nuonmagnum-igcc/. Development of a multi-fuel power plant based on coal gasification technology including CO2 capture from physical solvent since it is expected to be the most effective technology.
  40. 40.
    Biomass feedstock for IGCC systems Francesco Fantozzi and Pietro Bartocci University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100167-7.00004-4 in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technologies 2017, Pages 145–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Karg J. Is IGCC a viable option for biomass? Workshop IEA Bioenergy Task 33, Lucerne, 26 October2016 www.ieatask33.org/app/webroot/files/file/2016/IGCC.pdf
  42. 42.
    Oreggioni GB, Brandani S, Luberti M, Baykan Y, Friedrich D, Ahn H. CO2 capture from syngas by an adsorption process at a biomass gasification CHP plant: its comparison with amine-based CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;35:71–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    •• Oreggioni GB, Friedrich D, Brandani S, Ahn H. Techno-economic study of adsorption processes for pre-combustion carbon capture at a biomass CHP plant. Energy Procedia. 2014;63:6738–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.709 An interesting publication demonstrating the possibility to use adsorption at low to medium scales. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grande CA, Blom R, Andreassen KA, Stensrød RE. Experimental results of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for pre-combustion CO2 capture with metal organic frameworks. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2265–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Giroudière F, Ambrosino JL, Fischer B, Pavone D, Sanz-Garcia E, Le Gall A, Soutif E, Vleeming H. HyGenSys: a flexible process for hydrogen and power production with reduction of CO2 Emission Oil & Gas Science and Technology—Rev. IFP Energies Nouvelles 2010;65(5):673–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2009083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rönsch S, Schneider S, Matthischke S, Schlüter M, Götz M, Lefebvre J, et al. Review on methanation—from fundamentals to current projects. Fuel. 2016;166:276–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Jupiter 1000 project : https://www.jupiter1000.eu/english. 2017. Jupiter 1000 is the first industrial demonstrator of power to gas with a power rating of 1 MWe for electrolysis and a methanation process with carbon capture in France. It aims to convert renewable power surplus into green hydrogen and syngas for storage and propositions of technico/economic standards are expected by the consortium. Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Jeguirim M, Limousy L. Biomass chars: elaboration, characterization and applications. Energies. 2017;10(12):2040.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122040 An overview for biochar production methods, characterization techniques, and applications. It aims at demonstrating the diversity of research on biochars. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Renner R. Rethinking biochar. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:5932–3.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0726097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roddy DJ and Manson-Whitton C. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis. Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences Comprehensive Renewable Energy. 2012;5133–153.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Purakayastha TJ, Kumari S, Pathak H. Characterisation, stability, and microbial effects of four biochars produced from crop residues. Geoderma. 2015;239-240:293–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron. 2010;105:Chapter two.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jimenez-Cordero D, Heras F, Alonso-Morales N, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ. Porous structure and morphology of granular chars from flash and conventional pyrolysis of grape seeds. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;54:123–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guizani C, Haddad K, Limousy L, Jeguirim M. New insights on the structural evolution of biomass char upon pyrolysis as revealed by the Raman spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Carbon. 2017;119:519–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yuan H, Lu T, Huang H, Zhao D, Kobayashi N, Chen Y. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2015;112:284–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ghani WAWAK, Mohd A, da Silva G, Bachmann RT, Taufiq-Yap YH, Rashid U, et al. Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization. Ind Crop Prod. 2013;44:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, Shim S, Ra C. Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;79:255–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AA, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, et al. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere. 2014;99:19–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS, Whitaker J. The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil—the role of soil aeration. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;51:125–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lian F, Sun B, Song Z, Zhu L, Qi X, Xing B. Physiochemical properties of herb-residue biochar and its sorption to ionizable antibiotic sulfamethoxazole. Chem Eng J. 2014;248:128–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mohd A, Ghani WA, Resitanim NZ, Sanyang L. A review: carbon dioxide capture: biomass-derived-biochar and its applications. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2013;34:974–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2012.704753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ibarrola R, Shackley S, Hammond J. Pyrolysis biochar systems for recovering biodegradable materials: a life cycle carbon assessment. Waste Manag. 2012;32:859–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nasri NS, Hamza UD, Ismail SN, Ahmed MM, Mohsin R. Assessment of porous carbons derives from sustainable palm solid waste for carbon dioxide capture. J Clean Prod. 2014;71:148–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yang K, Yang J, Jiang Y, Wu W, Lin D. Correlations and adsorption mechanisms of aromatic compounds on a high heat temperature treated bamboo biochar. Environ Pollut. 2016;210:57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bamdad H, Hawboldt K, MacQuarrie S. A review on common adsorbents for acid gases removal: focus on biochar. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;81:1705–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR. Adsorption and transport of methane in biochars derived from waste. Wood. Waste Manag. 2015;43:218–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhang X, Gao B, Zheng Y, Hu X, Creamer AE, Annable MD, et al. Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245:606–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhang X, Gao B, Creamer AE, Cao C, Li Y. Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:102–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Klasson KT, Uchimiya M, Lima IM. Characterization of narrow micropores in almond shell biochars by nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen adsorption. Ind Crop Prod. 2015;67:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zhou L, Richard C, Ferronato C, Chovelon JM, Sleiman M. Investigating the performance of biomass-derived biochars for the removal of gaseous ozone, adsorbed nitrate and aqueous bisphenol A. Chem Eng J. 2018;334:2098–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lu F, Lu P. Experiment study on adsorption characteristics of SO2, NOx by biomass chars. 2010 Int. Conf. Digital Manufacturing & Automation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMA.2010.322
  72. 72.
    Lee JY, Park SH, Jeon JK, Yoo KS, Kim SS, Park YK. The removal of low concentration formaldehyde over sewage sludge char treated using various methods. Korean J Chem Eng. 2011;28(7):1556–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0007-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wang X, Sato T, Xing B. Competitive sorption of pyrene on wood chars. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:3267–72.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0521977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tan XF, Liu SB, Liu YG, Gu YL, Zeng GM, Hua XJ, et al. Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour Technol. 2017;227:359–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Conte P, Hanke UM, Marsala V, Cimò G, Alonzo G, Glaser B. Mechanisms of water interaction with pore systems of hydrochar and pyrochar from poplar forestry waste. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:4917–23.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5010034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cederlund H, Börjesson E, Lundberg D, Stenström J. Adsorption of pesticides with different chemical properties to a wood biochar treated with heat and iron. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227:203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2894-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhang P, Sun H, Yu L, Sun T. Adsorption and catalytic hydrolysis of carbaryl and atrazine on pig manure-derived biochars: impact of structural properties of biochars. J Hazard Mater. 2013;244–245:217–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Larous S, Meniai AH. Adsorption of diclofenac from aqueous solution using activated carbon prepared from olive stones. Int J hydrogen energ. 2016;4:10380–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    O’Connor D, Peng T, Zhang J, Tsang DCW, Alessi DS, Shen Z, et al. Biochar application for the remediation of heavy metal polluted land: a review of in situ field trials. Sci Total Environ. 2018;619–620:815–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Liu N, Zhou C, Fu S, Ashraf MI, Zhao E, Shi H, et al. Study on characteristics of ammonium nitrogen adsorption by biochar prepared in different temperature. Adv Mater Res. 2013;724-725:452–6.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.724-725.452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Li G, Shen B, Li Y, Zhao B, Wang F, He C, et al. Removal of element mercury by medicine residue derived biochars in presence of various gas compositions. J Hazard Mater. 2015;298:162–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sizmur T, Fresno T, Akgül G, Frost H, Moreno-Jiménez E. Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water. Bioresour Technol. 2017;246:34–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Zhang C, Shan B, Tang W, Zhu Y. Comparison of cadmium and lead sorption by Phyllostachys pubescens biochar produced under a low-oxygen pyrolysis atmosphere. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:352–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Tan C, Zeyu Z, Rong H, Ruihong M, Hongtao W, Wenjing L. Adsorption of cadmium by biochar derived from municipal sexage sludge: impact factors and adsorption mechanism. Chemosphere. 2015;134:286–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hasan Johir MA, Belhaj D. Competitive sorption affinity of sulfonamides and chloramphenicol antibiotics toward functionalized biochar for water and wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:306–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Chen J, Zhang D, Zhang H, Ghosh S, Pan B. Fast and slow adsorption of carbamazepine on biochar as affected by carbon structure and mineral composition. Sci Total Environ. 2017;579:598–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fan S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Tang J, Tang J, Li X. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5:601–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rebitanim NZ, Ghani WAK, Rebitanim NA, Mohd Salleh MA. Potential applications of wastes from energy generation particularly biochar in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2013;21:694–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Haddad K, Jellali S, Jeguirim M, Ben Hassen Trabelsi A, Limousy L. Research article: investigations on phosphorus recovery from aqueous solutions by biochars derived from magnesium-pretreated cypress sawdust. J Environ Manag. 2018;216:305–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Cukierman AL, Bonelli PR. Potentialities of biochars from different biomasses for climate change abatement by carbon capture and soil amelioration. Adv Environ Res 2015; 9(4):44:57–80.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tayade PR, Sapkal VS, Sapkal RS, Deshmukh SK, Rode CV, Shinde VM, Kanade GS. A method to minimize the global warming and environmental pollution. J Environ Sci Eng 2012;54(2):287–293.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Xu X, Kan Y, Zhao L, Cao X. Chemical transformation of CO2 during its capture by waste biomass derived biochars. Environ Pollut. 2016;213:533–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Schimmelpfennig S, Müller C, Grünhage L, Koch C, Kammann C. Biochar, hydrochar and uncarbonized feedstock application to permanent grassland—effects on greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth. Agric Ecosyst Plant Growth. 2014;191:39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shahkarami S, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Soltan J. Breakthrough CO2 adsorption in bio-based activated carbons. J Environ Sci. 2015;34:68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, et al. Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;40:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chu G, Zhao J, Huang Y, Zhou D, Liu Y, Wu M, et al. Phosphoric acid pretreatment enhances the specific surface areas of biochars by generation of micropores. Environ Pollut. 2018;240:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Creamer AE, Gao B, Zhang M. Carbon dioxide capture using biochar produced from sugarcane bagasse and hickory wood. Chem Eng J. 2014;249:174–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Feng Y, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Nitrogen enriched biochar modified by high temperature CO2-ammonia treatment: characterization and adsorption of CO2. Chem Eng J. 2014;257:20–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Nguyen MV, Lee BK. A novel removal of CO2 using nitrogen doped biochar beads as a green adsorbent. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2016;104:490–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Shao J, Chen Y, Feng Y, et al. Effects of hydrofluoric acid pre-deashing of rice husk on physicochemical properties and CO2 adsorption performance of nitrogen-enriched biochar. Energy. 2015;91:903–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Wu H, Feng Q. Fabrication of bimetallic Ag/Fe immobilized on modified biochar for removal of carbon tetrachloride. J Environ Sci. 2017;4:346–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Creamer AE, Gao B, Wang S. Carbon dioxide capture using various metal oxhyhydroxide-biochar composites. Chem Eng J. 2016;283:826–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR. Adsorption and transport of methane in biochars derived from waste wood. Waste Manag. 2015;43:218–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bader N, Ouederni A. Optimization of biomass-based carbon materials for hydrogen storage. J Energy Storage. 2016;5:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2015.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Gurudayal BJ, Srankó DF, Towle CM, Lum Y, Hettick M, Scott MC, et al. Efficient solar-driven electrochemical CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10:2222–30.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee01764b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    • Dowd AM, Rodriguez M, Jeanneret T. Social science insights for the BioCCS industry. Energies. 2015;8(5):4024–42.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en8054024 A rare study on bio-CSS acceptance in the literature. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Feenstra CFJ, Mikunda T, Brunsting S. What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands; Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN): Petten, The Netherlands, 2010;1–44.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Selosse S, Maïzi N. Exploring the biomass carbon capture solution to climate policy: a water impact analysis with TIAM-FR. [Research Report] Working Paper 2016-01-19, Chaire Modélisation prospective au service du développement durable. 2016, pp.16 - Les Cahiers de la Chaire. <hal-01286589>.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Smith P, Davis SJ, Creutzig F, Fuss S, Minx J, Gabrielle B, et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang. 2016;6:42–50.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris 13 CNRS LSPMSorbonne Paris CitéVilletaneuseFrance

Personalised recommendations