Towards Zero Energy and Zero Emission Buildings—Definitions, Concepts, and Strategies

Building Sustainability (N Nord, Section Editor)
First Online:
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Building Sustainability

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper focuses on the definition and application of Zero Energy and Zero Emission Buildings (ZEBs). Based on a review of mainly European and Norwegian definitions, case studies, and pilot buildings, the paper summarizes some main challenges with respect to the implementation of ZEBs; What kind of strategies are used in current pilot projects of ZEBs? How to apply definitions and targets for ZEBs that take into account different available resources and boundary conditions?

Recent Findings

Previous studies have shown that most definitions of ZEBs include only the energy use for operation of buildings, while recent developments also include the embodied energy or emissions in materials. Published analyses of pilot building projects and case studies also show that most ZEBs apply a strategy of first reducing the energy need by applying efficiency measures, and then applying on-site or off-site renewable energy technologies.

Summary

The findings indicate that prescribing a hierarchy of different ambition levels for the definition of ZEBs would be beneficial to allow for flexibility with respect to available resources and different boundary conditions.

Keywords

Zero energy buildings Zero emission buildings Definitions Targets Strategies Review 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Inger Andresen reports grants from Norwegian Research Council.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    European Parliament. Report on A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 (2011/2095(INI)). Brussels: Committee on the environment, Public Health and Food Safety, A7–033/2012; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BPIE. Principles for nearly zero-energy buildings. Paving the way for effective implementation of policy requirements Brussels: Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE); 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EPBD Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 may 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Brussels: European Parliament; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurnitski J. How to define nearly net zero energy buildings nZEB – REHVA proposal for uniformed national implemation of EPBD recast. REHVA Journal. Brussels: Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giuliano D, Bruni E, Sarto L. An Italian pilot project for zero energy buildings: towards a quality-driven approach. Renew Energy. 2013;50:840–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang L, Gwilliam J, Jones P. Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energy and Buildings. 2009;41(11):1215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLeod RS, Hopfe CJ, Rezgui Y. An investigation into recent proposals for a revised definition of zero carbon homes in the UK. Energy Policy. 2012;46:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dokka TH, Sartori I, Thyholt M, Lien K, Lindberg KB. A Norwegian zero emission building definition. In proceedings from PassivhusNorden’13, 15–17 October 2013; Göteborg, Sweden Göteborg: Låganbygg; 2013.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winkelmann, S. Net-Zero Energy Home. Definitions and Performance Metrics Project. Toronto: Net-Zero Energy Home Coalition; 2012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peterson K, et al. A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings. U.S Department of energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riedy C, Lederwasch A, Ison N. Defining zero emission buildings. Review and recommendations: final report. Sydney: Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council; 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas WD, Duffy JJ. Energy performance of net-zero and near net-zero energy homes in New England. Energy and Buildings. 2013;67:551–8. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Bourrelle JS, Musall E, Voss K, Sartori I, Napolitano A. Zero energy building – a review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and Buildings. 2011;43(4):971–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    •• Sartori I, Napolitano A, Voss K. Net zero energy buildings: a consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings. 2012;48:220–32. A well-structured and comprehensive description of main issues that should be taken into account in the definition of ZEBs. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sartori I, Andresen I. Klimaeffekten av bygninger (the climate effect of buildings). In: Hagen KP, Volden GH, editors. Investeringsprosjekter og miljøkonsekvenser (Investment projects and environmental impacts), Concept report 48. Trondheim: Ex ante Academic Publishing; 2016.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sartori I, Hestnes AG. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy and Buildings. 2007;39(3):249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Berggren B, Hall M, Wall M. LCE analysis of buildings – taking the step towards net zero energy buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2013;62:381–91. A comprehensive analysis of the increase of embodied energy compared to the decrease of the energy use related to building operation; partly by a literature review, partly by detailed analysis of eleven case studies; taking the step from a low energy building to a Net ZEB. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cabeza LF, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;29:394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chau C, Leung T, Ng W. A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Appl Energy. 2015;143:395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hernandez P, Kenny P. From net energy to zero energy buildings: defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy and Buildings. 2010;42(6):815–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cellura M, et al. Energy life-cycle approach in net zero energy buildings balance: operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study. Energy and Buildings. 2014;72:371–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibn-Mohammed T, et al. Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—a review of current trends. Energy and Buildings. 2013;66:232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lützkendorf T, et al. Net-zero buildings: incorporating embodied impacts. Building Research & Information. 2015;43(1):62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Himpe E, Trappers L, Debacker W, Delghust M, Laverge J, Janssens A, Moens J, Van Holm M. Life cycle energy analysis of a zero-energy house. Building Research & Information. 2013;41:435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Kristjansdottir T, Fjeldheim H, Selvig E, Risholt B, Time B, Georges L, Dokka TH, Bourelle J, Bohne RB, Cervenka Z. A Norwegian ZEB Definition Embodied Emissions, ZEB report 17. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2014. A detailed descritpon and discussion of factors influencing the emissions from materials use.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Musall E, Weiss T, Lenoir A, Voss K, Garde F, Donn M. Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings: An Overview and Analysis on Worldwide Building Projects. Proceedings from EuroSun Conference, Graz, Austria; 2010. A comprehensive overview of Zero Energy Buildings.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    • Fufa SM, Schlanbusch RD, Sørnes K, Inman M, Andresen I. A Norwegian ZEB Definition Guideline, ZEB report 29. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2016. A detailed description of the Norwegian ZEB defintion . Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    NS-EN 15978:2011. Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method European Committee for Standardization; 2011.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Li DHW, Yang L, Lam JC. Zero energy buildings and sustainalbe development implications – a review. Energy. 2013;54:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.070. A comprehensive review of Zero Energy Buildings. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andresen I, Haanshuus F, Hoel J, Jonassen I, Nilsen NI, Mysen M, Nytræ S, Time B. Design of a Zero Energy Office Building at Haakonsvern, Bergen. In proceedings of PassivhusNorden. Trondheim: Akademika Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    DetailGreen. Sanierum eines Bürogebäudes in Bærum. Energiwende im Tarnkleid (Refurbishment of an office building in Bærum. Energy efficiency in disguise). DetailGreen 1:2015. Munich: Institut für internationale Architektur-Dokumentation GmbH & Co. KG; 2015.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dokka TH, Berggren B, Lassen N. Comparison of five zero and plus energy projects in Sweden and Norway, A technical review. Proceedings of the 7th PassivhusNorden Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark: BYG Rapport R-334; 2015.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fjeldheim H, Kristjansdottir T, Sørnes K. Establishing the life cycle primary energy balance for Powerhouse Kjørbo. Proceedings of the 7th PassivhusNorden Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark: BYG Rapport R-334; 2015.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goia F, Finocchiaro L, Gustavsen A. The ZEB Living Laboratory at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology: a zero emission house for engineering and social science experiments. Proceedings of the 7th PassivhusNorden Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark: BYG Rapport R-334; 2015.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Inman MR, Wiberg AH. Life cycle GHG emissions of material use in the Living laboratory. ZEB report 24. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kristjansdottir T, Andresen I, Amundsen H, Good C. Design phase calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for a zero emission residential pilot building. Proceedings of SBE16-International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment. Hamburg, Germany; 2016.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kristjansdottir TF, Good CS, Inman MR, Schlanbusch RD, Andresen I. Embodied greenhouse gas emissions from PV systems in Norwegian residential zero emission pilot buildings. Sol Energy. 2015;133:155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Meistad T, Strand L. Powerhouse one – Erfaringer med å utarbeide konseptet for et nullenergi-bygg (Powerhouse one – experiences from the design of a zero energy building). ZEB report 11. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nord N, Qvistgaard LH, CAO G. Identifying key design parameters of the integrated energy system for a residential zero emission building in Norway. Renew Energy. 2016;87:1076–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Risholt B, Thomsen J, Kristjansdottir T, Haase M, Lien K, Dokka TH. Energikonsepter for Ådland boligområde (Energy Concepts for Ådland Housing Area), ZEB report no. 15. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sartori I, Merlet S, Thorud B, Haug T, Andresen I. Zero Village Bergen. Aggregated loads and PV generation profiles. ZEB report 28. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sørensen Å, Andresen I, Kristjansdottir T, Amundsen H, Edwards K. ZEB Pilot House Larvik. As-built report. ZEB report XX (in press). Trondheim, Norway: Sintef Academic Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thyholt M, Dokka TH, Rasmussen R. The Skarpnes residential development - a zero energy pilot project. Proceedings of PassivhusNorden’12, Trondheim, Norway; 2012.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Throndsen W, Berker T, Knoll E. Powerhouse Kjørbo. Evaluation of construction process and early use phase. ZEB report 25. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Andresen I, et al. Introduction to Integrated Energy Design, Report within the EU-project INTEND – Integrated Energy Design for Public Buildings, www.intendesign.com.
  46. 46.
    Dokka TH, Grini C. Etterprøving av bygningers energibruk. Metodikk. (Testing and documentation of buildings energy performance). SINTEF Fag 6. Oslo: Sintef Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P. Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential net zero energy building in Denmark. Energy. 2011;36:5600–9. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Jensen RL, Nørgaard J. On-site or off-site renewable energy supply options? Life cycle cost analysis of a net zero energy building in Denmark. Renew Energy. 2012;44:154–65. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zeiler W, Gvozdenović K, de Bont K, Maassen W. Toward cost-effective nearly zero energy buildings: the Dutch situation. Science and Technology for the Built Environment. 2016;22:911–27. doi: 10.1080/23744731.2016.1187552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Standard Norway. NS 3700: 2013 criteria for passive houses and low energy buildings - residential buildings (in Norwegian). Oslo: Standard Norway; 2012.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Standard Norway. NS 3701: 2012 criteria for passive houses and low energy buildings - non-residential buildings (in Norwegian). Oslo: Standards Norway; 2012.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Erhorn H, Erhorn-Kluttig H. Selected examples of Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings. Detailed Report. Report for the Concerted Action on Energy Performance of Buildings, www.epbd-ca.eu; 2014.
  53. 53.
    Sartori I. Noris F, Herkel S. Cost analysis of nZEB/Plus energy buildings, REHVA Journal, Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations, May 2011, Issue 3 (May-Jun) 2015.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    FhG-ISE. Photovoltaic Report. Freiburg: Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, ISE; 2016. Freiburg. Germany.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bayer P, Saner D, Bolay S, Rybach L, Blum P. Greenhouse gas emission savings of ground source heat pump systems in Europe: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16(2):1256–67. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chua KJ, Chou SK, Yang WM. Advances in heat pump systems: a review. Appl Energy. 2010;87:3611–24. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Solli J, Berker T. Economic feasibility and zero emission buildings. A state-of-the-art report. ZEB report 19. Trondheim: Sintef Academic Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Leckner M, Zmeureanu R. Life cycle cost and energy analysis of a net zero energy house with solar combisystem. Appl Energy. 2011;88:232–1. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Georges L, Haase M, Wiberg AH, Kristjansdottir T, Risholt B. Life cycle emissions analysis of two nZEB concepts. Building Research & Information. 2015;43:82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Noris F, Musall E, Salom J, Berggren B, Jensen SØ, Lindberg K, Sartori I. Implications of weighting factors on technology preference in net zero energy buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2014;82:250–62. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Graabak I, Bakken BH, Feilberg N. Zero emission building and conversion factors between electricity consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases in a long term perspective. Environmental and Climate Technologies. 2014;13:12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Salom J, Marszal AJ, Widen J, Canaden J, Lindberg KB. Analysis of load match and grid interaction indicators in net zero energy buildings with simulated and monitored data. Appl Energy. 2014;136:119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Voss K, Musall E. Net zero energy buildings: International projects of carbon neutrality in buildings. Walter de Gruyter; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations