Advertisement

Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 337–354 | Cite as

Geotechnical Properties of Rubber Reinforced Cemented Clayey Soil

  • Jitendra Singh YadavEmail author
  • Shaik Hussain
  • Ankit Garg
  • S. K. Tiwari
Technical Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on the effect two forms of waste rubber tyres of granulate (Rg) and fibre (Rf) categories on the compaction–strength–consolidation–swell–durability behaviour of uncemented/cemented clayey soil. The effect of incorporation of five proportions 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% Rg/Rf (by weight of soil) and three proportions 0%, 3% and 6% cement (by weight of soil) was assessed. Reduction in maximum dry unit weight (γmax) and optimum water content (ωopt) of clayey soil and cemented clayey soil was observed with the incorporation of ruuber granulates (Rg) and rubber fibres (Rf). Both unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and split tensile strength (STS) of the clayey soil were primarily controlled by the amount of cement and waste rubber tyres and it was found to be decreased with the enhancement in rubber content. But addition of Rg and Rf was found to improve the ductility and strain hardening behaviour of cemented clayey soil, prosperously under unconfined compression. Inclusion Rg was found to be ineffective to overshadow the brittleness of the cemented clayey soil subjected to tensile loads. The inclusion of higher rubber content had lowered the strength of cemented significantly. Decline in the California bearing ratio (CBR) value, swelling pressure (σs) and increment in the compression index (Cc) and weight loss during wet/dry cycles were observed with the incorporation of Rg and Rf in cemented clayey soil. The results of all performed tests were cross checked and compared with various Indian standards to reach at the optimum dose of Rg and Rf that can be added to cemented clayey soil for its possible applications in back filling, construction of embankment (for rural roads), sub-grade course, sub-base course and slide slope of canal. The form of waste rubber tyre i.e. Rg and Rf had significant effect on the geotechnical characteristics of cemented clayey soil. Overall, Rf had outperformed the Rg, considering all evaluated geotechnical properties. Maximum dose of Rg and Rf to be added in cemented clayey soil should not be more than 5% and 7.5%, respectively.

Keywords

Rubber granulates Rubber fibres Cemented clay Geotechnical properties 

Notes

References

  1. Abbaspour, M., Aflaki, E., Moghadas Nejad, F.: Reuse of waste tire textile fibers as soil reinforcement. J Clean Prod. 207, 1059–1071 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbulut, S., Arasan, S., Kalkan, E.: Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibers. Appl Clay Sci. 38, 23–32 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2007.02.001 Accessed 27.11.2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amjera, B., Tiwari, B., Koirala, J., Obaid, Z.: Compaction characteristics, unconfined compressive strengths, and coefficients of permeability of fine-grained soils mixed with crumb-rubber tire. J Mater Civ Eng. 29(1–10), 04017148 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001989 Accessed 27.11.2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM, C496-96: Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Cabalar, A.F., Karabash, Z., Mustafa, W.S.: Stabilising a clay using tyre buffings and lime. Road Mater Pavement Des. 15, 872–891 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.939697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cetin, H., Fener, M., Gunaydin, O.: Geotechnical properties of tire-cohesive clayey soil mixtures as a fill material. Eng Geol. 88, 110–120 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, C.: Mechanical properties of clayey sand treated with cement-rubbershreds. Civ Eng Dimens. 14, 7–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. Foose, G.J., Benson, C.H., Bosscher, P.J.: Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. J Geotech Eng. 122, 760–767 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:9(760) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hennebert, P., Lambert, S., Fouillen, F., Charrasse, B.: Assessing the environmental impact of shredded tires as embankment fill material. Can Geotech J. 51, 469–478 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IRC SP-20-2002 (2002) Rural roads manualGoogle Scholar
  11. IRC: SP 89-2010 Guidelines for soil and granular material stbailization using cement, lime & fly ashGoogle Scholar
  12. IS 2720-10 (1991) Methods of test for soils, part 10: determination of unconfined compressive strength Google Scholar
  13. IS 2720-15 (1965) Methods of test for soils, part XV: determination of consolidation propertiesGoogle Scholar
  14. IS 2720-16 (1987) Methods of test for soils, part 16: laboratory determination of CBRGoogle Scholar
  15. IS 2720-41 (1977) Methods of test for soils, part 41: measurement of swelling pressure of soils Google Scholar
  16. IS 2720–8 (1983) Methods of test for soils, part 8: determination of water content-dry density relation using heavy compactionGoogle Scholar
  17. IS 4332-4 (1968) Methods of test for stabilized soils, part 4: wetting and drying, and freezing and thawing tests for compacted soil-cement mixturesGoogle Scholar
  18. IS 9451 (1994) Guidelines for lining of canals in expansive soilsGoogle Scholar
  19. Jafari, M., Esna-ashari, M.: Cold regions science and technology effect of waste tire cord reinforcement on unconfined compressive strength of lime stabilized clayey soil under freeze–thaw condition. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 82, 21–29 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, H.-K., Santamarina, J.C.: Sand–rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Can Geotech J. 45, 1457–1466 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lv, J., Zhou, T., Du, Q., Wu, H.: Effects of rubber particles on mechanical properties of lightweight aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater. 91, 145–149 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MoRD-Specifications-for-Rural-Roads-2014.Google Scholar
  23. Otoko, G.R., Pedro, P.P.: Cement stabilization of laterite and Chikoko soils using waste rubber fibre. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol. 3, 130–136 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. Özkul, Z.H., Baykal, G.: Shear strength of clay with rubber fiber inclusions. Geosynth Int. 13, 173–180 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2006.13.5.173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubber Asia 2016: Need to regulate end-of-life tyres market in India, https://www.rubberasia.com/2016/06/11/need-to-regulate-end-of-life-tyres-market-in-india/
  26. Saberian, M., Li, J., Thach Nguyen, B., Setunge, S.: Estimating the resilient modulus of crushed recycled pavement materials containing crumb rubber using the Clegg impact value. Resour Conserv Recycl. 141, 301–307 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarvade, P.G., Shet, P.R.: Geotechnical properties of problem clay stabilized with crumb rubber powder. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci. 2, 27–32 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.9756/BIJIEMS.1671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheikh, M.N., Mashiri, M.S., Vinod, J.S., Tsang, H., Asce, M.: Shear and compressibility behavior of sand–tire crumb mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng. 25, 1366–1374 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shu, X., Huang, B.: Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and portland cement concrete: an overview. Constr Build Mater. 67, 217–224 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Signes, C.H., Garzón-Roca, J., Martínez Fernández, P., Garrido de la Torre, M.E., Insa Franco, R.: Swelling potential reduction of Spanish argillaceous marlstone facies tap soil through the addition of crumb rubber particles from scrap tyres. Appl Clay Sci. 132–133, 768–773 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soltani, A., Deng, A., Taheri, A., Sridharan, A.: Consistency limits and compaction characteristics of clays soils containing rubber waste. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Geotech Eng. 172, 1–34 (2018a).  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.18.00042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soltani, A., Deng, A., Taheri, A., Mirzababaei, M.: Rubber powder-polymer combined stabilization of South Australian expansive soils. Geosynth Int. 25, 304–321 (2018b).  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soltani, A., Deng, A., Taheri, A., Sridharan, A.: Swell–shrink–consolidation behavior of rubber–reinforced expansive soils. Geotech Test J. 42, 761–788 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Srivastava, A., Pandey, S., Rana, J.: Use of shredded tyre waste in improving the geotechnical properties of expansive black cotton soil. Geomech Geoengin. 9, 303–311 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.902121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tajdini, M., Nabizadeh, A., Taherkhani, H., Zartaj, H.: Effect of added waste rubber on the properties and failure mode of kaolinite clay. Int J Civ Eng. 15, 1–10 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0057-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tatlisoz, N., Benson, C.H., Edil, T.B.: Effect of fines on the mechanical properties of soil-tire chip mixtures. Test soil Mix with waste or Recycl Mater ASTM Int. 1997(2), 40–47 (1997)Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, B.S., Gupta, R.C.: Long term behaviour of cement concrete containing discarded tire rubber. J Clean Prod. 102, 78–87 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trouzine, H., Asroun, a., Bekhiti, M.: Effects of scrap tyre rubber fibre on swelling behaviour of two clayey soils in Algeria. Geosynth Int. 19, 124–132 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2012.19.2.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, F.C., Song, W.: Effects of crumb rubber on compressive strength of cement-treated soil. Arch Civ Eng LXI. 61, 59–78 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1515/ace-2015-0036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yadav, J.S., Tiwari, S.K.: A study on the potential utilization of crumb rubber in cement treated soft clay. J Build Eng. 9, 177–191 (2017a).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yadav, J.S., Tiwari, S.K.: Effect of waste rubber fibres on the geotechnical properties of clay stabilized with cement. Appl Clay Sci. 149, 97–110 (2017b).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yadav, J.S., Tiwari, S.K.: Evaluation of the strength characteristics of cement-stabilized clay–crumb rubber mixtures for its sustainable use in geotechnical applications. Environ Dev Sustain. 20, 1961–1985 (2017c).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9972-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yadav, J.S., Tiwari, S.K.: The impact of end-of-life tires on the mechanical properties of fine-grained soil: a review. Environ Dev Sustain. 21, 485–568 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0054-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yadav, J.S., Hussain, S., Tiwari, S.K., Garg, A.: Assessment of the load–deformation behaviour of rubber fibre–reinforced cemented clayey soil. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol. 6, 105–136 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00073-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Youwai, S., Bergado, D.T.: Strength and deformation characteristics of shredded rubber tire sand mixtures. Can Geotech J. 40, 254-264 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jitendra Singh Yadav
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shaik Hussain
    • 1
  • Ankit Garg
    • 3
  • S. K. Tiwari
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringManipal University JaipurJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringMalaviya National Institute of Technology JaipurJaipurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringShantou UniversityShantouChina

Personalised recommendations