As it is known, Gleason’s theorem is not applicable for a two-dimensional Hilbert space since in this situation Gleason’s axioms are not strong enough to imply Born’s rule thus leaving room for a dispersion-free probability measure, i.e., one that has only values 0 and 1. To strengthen Gleason’s axioms one must add at least one more assumption. But, as it is argued in the present paper, alternatively one can give up the lattice condition lying in the foundation of Gleason’s theorem. Particularly, the lattice structure based on the closed linear subspaces in the Hilbert space could be weakened by the requirement for the meet operation to exist only for the subspaces belonging to commutable projection operators. The paper demonstrates that this weakening can resolve the problem of the dispersion-free probability measure in the case of a qubit.
Quantum mechanics Closed subspaces Lattice structures Probability measures
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The author wishes to thank the anonymous referee for the helpful feedback and insights.
Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
Benavoli, A., Facchini, A., Zaffalon, M.: A Gleason-type theorem for any dimension based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 47, 991–1002 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar