Abstract
The outcome of a weak quantum measurement conditioned to a subsequent post-selection (a weak value protocol) can assume peculiar values. These results cannot be explained in terms of conditional probabilistic outcomes of projective measurements. However, a classical model has been recently put forward that can reproduce peculiar expectation values, reminiscent of weak values. This led the authors of that work to claim that weak values have an entirely classical explanation. Here we discuss what is quantum about weak values with the help of a simple model based on basic quantum mechanics. We first demonstrate how a classical theory can indeed give rise to non-trivial conditional values, and explain what features of weak values are genuinely quantum. We finally use our model to outline some main issues under current research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D., Vaidmann, L.: How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1998)
Ferrie, C., Combes, J.: How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014)
Kirkpatrick, K.: Classical three-box ‘paradox’. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 4891900 (2003)
Dressel, J., Jordan, A.N.: Sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the weak value. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 015304 (2012)
Ravon, T., Vaidman, L.: The three-box paradox revisited. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 2873 (2007)
Dressel, J., Agarwal, A., Jordan, A.: Contextual values of observables in quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 240401 (2010)
Dressel, J.: Weak values as interference phenomena. Phys. Rev. A 91, 032116 (2015)
Pusey, M.F.: Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 200401 (2014)
Hoffmann, H., Iinuma, M., Shikano, Y.: Why the “classical” explanation of weak values by Ferrie and Combes does not work: a comment on. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014). arXiv:1410.7126
Ipsen, A.: Disturbance in weak measurements and the difference between quantum and classical weak values. Phys. Rev. A 91, 062120 (2015)
Steinberg, A.M.: How Much Time Does a Tunneling Particle Spend in the Barrier Region? Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2405 (1995)
Choi, Y., Jordan, A.N.: Operational approach to indirectly measuring the tunneling time. Phys. Rev. A 88, 052128 (2013)
Romito, A., Gefen, Y.: Weak measurement of cotunneling time. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085417 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romito, A., Jordan, A.N., Aharonov, Y. et al. Weak values are quantum: you can bet on it. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 3, 1–4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-015-0069-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-015-0069-z