Advertisement

Plant Physiology Reports

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 376–387 | Cite as

Proline and carbohydrate metabolism in rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.) under various drought and recovery conditions

  • Doan Cong DienEmail author
  • Thieu Thi Phong Thu
  • Kyi Moe
  • Takeo Yamakawa
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Drought stress is a main limitation of rice production in many regions worldwide, as most improved rice varieties are not drought tolerant. This study analyzed the effects of various drought stresses and subsequent recovery on dry weight accumulation and biochemical characteristics of different rice varieties (the drought-tolerant variety DA8, the drought-sensitive variety Malagkit Pirurutong, and the fast-recovering variety Kinandang Patong). The water treatments were irrigated (control), drought stress, and subsequent re-watering. The results showed that under the same drought stress level, DA8 retained higher water content than the other varieties. In addition, water content in sheaths was higher than that in leaves. DA8 obtained a higher dry weight accumulation than the other varieties under both the control and drought conditions. Proline content in all varieties increased significantly after drought stress. In addition, it accumulated more in leaves than in sheaths. DA8 expressed a higher ability to accumulate proline than Malagkit Pirurutong or Kinandang Patong. Total soluble sugar and starch contents of the three varieties decreased under drought stress compared to control. However, the change in total soluble sugar and starch levels depended not only on the drought stress condition but also on the environment and variety. Proline-accumulating ability under drought stress may be a useful indicator of the drought tolerance of rice.

Keywords

Drought stress Proline metabolism Rice Soluble sugar Starch 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Monbukagakusho Scholarship from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). The authors would like to thank Dr. Toshihiro Mochizuki, Agricultural Ecology Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, for providing research facilities.

References

  1. Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany,59, 206–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandurska, H., Niedziela, J., Pietrowska-Borek, M., Nuc, K., Chadzinikolau, T., & Radzikowska, D. (2017). Regulation of proline biosynthesis and resistance in drought stress in two barley (Hordeum vulgara L.) genotypes of different origin. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,118, 427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal, K. C., & Nagarajan, S. (1986). Leaf water content, stomatal conductance and proline accumulation in leaves of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in response to water stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology,29, 397–404.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil,39, 205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum, A., & Ebercon, A. (1976). Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. III. Free proline accumulation and drought resistance. Crop Science,16, 428–431.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600030030x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dien, D., Yamakawa, T., Mochizuki, T., & Htwe, A. (2017). Dry weight accumulation, root plasticity, and stomatal conductance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties under drought stress and re-watering conditions. American Journal of Plant Science,8, 3189–3206.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.812215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang, Y., & Xiong, L. (2015). General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and Molecular Science Sciences,72, 673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, K. S., Atlin, G., Blum, A., Fukai, S., Lafitte, R., & Mackill, D. (2003). Breeding rice for drought-prone environments (pp. 1–4). Los Banos: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. González‐Cruz, J., & Pastenes, C. (2012). Water‐stress‐induced thermotolerance of photosynthesis in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants: The possible involvement of lipid composition and xanthophyll cycle pigments. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 77, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, A. D., Nelson, C. E., & Everson, E. H. (1977). Evaluation of free proline accumulation as an index of drought resistance using two contrasting barley cultivars. Crop Science,17, 720–726.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700050012x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hare, P. D., Cress, W. A., & Van Staden, J. (1998). Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant, Cell and Environment,21, 535–553.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00309.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan, F., & Guy, C. L. (2004). β-Amylase induction and the protective role of maltose during temperature shock. Plant Physiology,135, 1674–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kishor, P. B. K., & Sreenivasulu, N. (2014). Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? Plant, Cell and Environment,37, 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koster, K., & Leopold, A. (1988). Sugars and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiology,88, 829–832.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.3.829.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Krasensky, J., & Jonak, C. (2012). Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. Journal of Experimental Botany,63, 1593–1608.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemoine, R., Camera, S., Atanassova, R., Dédaldéchamp, F., Allario, T., Pourtau, N., et al. (2013). Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Frontiers in Plant Science,4, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindenberg, J., Manning, D. B., & Schmidt, H. (2015). The bark to wood ratio of the poplar variety Populus maximowiczii × Populus nigra grown in short rotation coppice and the calorific properties of the resultant woodfuel. In D. B. Manning, A. Bemmann, M. Bredemeier, N. Lamersdorf, & C. Ammer (Eds.), Bioenergy from dendromass for the sustainable development of rural areas (pp. 469–481). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Man, D., Bao, Y. X., Han, L. B., & Zhang, X. (2011). Drought tolerance associated with proline and hormone metabolism in two tall fescue cultivars. HortScience,1, 1027–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthias, T., Diana, P., David, S., Daniel, H., Arianna, N., Tiago, M., et al. (2016). Regulation of leaf starch degradation by abscisic acid is important for osmotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell,28(8), 1860–1878.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthias, T., & Diana, S. (2017). Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytologist,214, 943–951.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oscar, G. B., María, B., María, T., Sanchez, B., María, I. E., & Carmen, M. (2010). The effects of high CO2 levels on anthocyanin composition, antioxidant activity and soluble sugar content of strawberries stored at low non-freezing temperature. Food Chemistry,122, 673–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parida, A., & Dagaonkar, V. S. (2008). Differential responses of enzymes involved in proline biosynthesis and degradation in drought tolerant and sensitive cotton genotypes during drought stress and recovery. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,30, 619–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-008-0157-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parvaiz, A., & Satyawati, S. (2008). Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants. Plant, Soil and Environment,54(3), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rathinasabapathi, B. (2000). Metabolic engineering for stress tolerance: Installing osmoprotectant synthetic pathways. Annals of Botany,86, 709–716.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosa, M., Prado, C., Podazza, G., Interdonato, R., González, J. A., Hilal, M., et al. (2009). Soluble sugars—Metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: A complex network in the life of plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior,4(5), 388–393.  https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.5.8294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schafleitner, R., Gaudin, A., Gutierrez-Rosales, R. O., Alvarado-Aliaga, C. A., & Bonierbale, M. (2007). Proline accumulation and real time PCR expression analysis of genes encoding enzymes of proline metabolism in relation to drought tolerance in Andean potato. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,29, 19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-006-0003-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seck, P. A., Diagne, A., Mohanty, S., & Wopereis, M. (2012). Crops that feed the world 7: Rice. Food Security,4, 7–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0168-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serraj, R., & Sinclair, T. R. (2002). Osmolyte accumulation: Can it really help increase crop yield under drought condtions? Plant, Cell and Environment,25(2), 333–341.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00754.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Siaut, M., Cuine, S., Cagnon, C., Fessler, B., Nguyen, M., Carrier, P., et al. (2011). Oil accumulation in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: characterization, variability between common laboratory strains and relationship with starch reserves. BMC Biotechnology,11, 7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh, T. N., Aspinall, D., & Paleg, L. G. (1973). Stress metabolism. IV. The influence of (2-chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride and gibberellic acid on the growth and proline accumulation of wheat plants during water stress. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences,26, 77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9730077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skirycz, A., Bodt, S. D., Obata, T., Clercq, I. D., Claeys, H., Rycke, R. D., et al. (2010). Developmental stages specificity and the role of mitochondrial metabolism in the response of Arabidopsis leaves to prolonged mild osmotic stress. Plant Physiology,152, 226–244.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Stewart, C. R. (1972). Proline content and metabolism during rehydration of wilted excised leaves in the dark. Plant Physiology,51, 508–511.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.50.6.679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sultan, M. A. R. F., Hui, L., Yang, L. J., & Xian, Z. H. (2012). Assessment of drought tolerance of some triticumg I. Species through physiological indices. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding,48, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010). Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science,15(2), 89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Verbruggen, N., & Hermans, C. (2008). Proline accumulation in plants: Review. Amino Acids,35, 753–759.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, X., Chang, L., Wang, B., Wang, D., Li, P., Wang, L., et al. (2013). Comparative proteomics of Thellungiella halophila leaves from plants subjected to salinity reveals the importanceof chloroplastic starch and soluble sugarsin halophyte salt tolerance. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics,12, 2174–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M112.022475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu, S. M., Liu, L. X., Woo, K. C., & Wang, D. L. (2007). Changes in photosynthesis, xanthophyll cycle and sugar accumulation in two North Australia Tropical species differing in leaf angles. Photosynthetica,45, 348–354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0059-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu, W., Cui, K., Xu, A., Nie, L., Huang, J., & Peng, S. (2015). Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,37, 9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1760-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoshida, S., Douglas, D. A., Cock, J. H., & Kwanchai, A. G. (1976). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice (pp. 46–49p). Los Banos: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Zanella, M., Borghi, G. L., Pirone, C., Thalmann, M., Pazmino, D., Costa, A., Santelia, D., Trost, P., & Sparla, F. (2016). β-Amylase 1 (BAM1) degrades transitory starch to sustain proline biosynthesis during drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 1819–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society for Plant Physiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Nutrition, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, School of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Cultivation Science, Faculty of AgronomyVietNam National University of AgricultureHa NoiViet Nam
  3. 3.Laboratory of Plant Nutrition, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations