Physiological responses of commercial sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) varieties to moisture deficit stress tolerance
- 50 Downloads
Physiological responses of 52 commercial sugarcane varieties (Saccharum sp. hybrids) were studied by withholding irrigation after 2 months of growth under green house conditions. Based on the time taken for appearance of wilting symptoms after exposure to moisture deficit stress, varieties were grouped into different groups and susceptible (Co 775 and Co 99010) and highly tolerant (Co 94008, CoT 8201 and ISH 100) varieties were identified. Physiological parameters such as proline, RWC and chlorophyll content were measured 8 days after stress induction and the changes were recorded under unstressed and stressed conditions. RWC and chlorophyll content under stress condition were positively correlated with the time taken for appearance of wilting symptoms. Reduction in RWC and chlorophyll content under stress condition was negatively correlated with the time taken for appearance of wilting symptoms. Hence, RWC and chlorophyll content can be suggested as a good indicator of stress tolerance.
KeywordsCorrelation Moisture deficit stress Physiological responses Sugarcane
We acknowledge the Indian Council for Cultural Relations, New Delhi for the Financial Assistance in the form of Fellowship to the first author. We also thank Dr. S. B. Patil, Head, ARS, Sankeshwar for a sharing sugarcane varieties and Dr. R.V. Koti for his valuable suggestions while planning the experiment.
- Bayoumi, T. Y., Eid, M. H., & Metwali, E. M. (2008). Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 2341–2352.Google Scholar
- Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I physical and mineralogical properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.Google Scholar
- Ceh, B., Cerenak, A., & Majer, D. (2009). Potassium and proline content in hop leaves as biochemical marker for drought stress tolerance. Hmeljarski Bilten, 16, 43–52.Google Scholar
- Gomathi, R., & Vasantha, S. (2010). Screening for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Extension publication no 180, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India.Google Scholar
- Gomathi, R., Vasantha, S., Hemaprabha, G., Alarmelu, S., & Shanthi, R. M. (2011). Evaluation of elite sugarcane clones for drought tolerance. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 1(1), 55–62.Google Scholar
- Hemaprabha, G., Natarajan, U. S., Balasundaram, N., & Singh, N. K. (2006). STMS based genetic divergence among common parents and its use in identifying productive cross combinations for varietal evolution in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Sugarcane International, 24(6), 22–27.Google Scholar
- Manivannan, P., Jaleel, C. A., Chang-Xing, Z., Somasundaram, R., & Azooz, M. M. (2008). Variations in growth and pigment composition of sunflower varieties under early season drought stress. Global Journal of Molecular Sciences, 3, 50–56.Google Scholar
- Panse, V. G., & Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers (pp. 167–174). New Delhi: ICAR Publication.Google Scholar
- Rao, K. C., & Asokan, S. (1978). Studies of free proline association to drought resistance in sugar cane. Sugar Journal, 40, 23–24.Google Scholar
- Swapna, S., & Hemaprabha, G. (2010). Identification of two new drought specific candidate genes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(4), 1164–1170.Google Scholar