CAD/CAM Custom Abutments for Esthetic Anterior Implant-Supported Restoration: Materials and Design
- 67 Downloads
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to discuss the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom abutments in the anterior region with a focus on abutment design and material selection. Advantages, disadvantages, and complications of CAD/CAM abutments are also considered.
CAD/CAM abutments are available in various materials and with different connection platforms to the implant in order to meet esthetic, functional, and biological demands. Use of CAD/CAM concepts in the fabrication of custom abutments allows for definite advantages over both stock abutments and conventional cast custom abutments.
CAD/CAM technology should be considered when restoring dental implants in the esthetic zone.
KeywordsCAD/CAM abutments Anterior implants Zirconia abutment Titanium abutment Esthetics
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consents
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.• Lops D, Bressan E, Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Cecchinato D, Romeo E. Soft tissues stability of CAD/CAM and stock abutments in anterior regions: 2-year prospective multicentric cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(12):1436–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12479. Study investigating if the type of abutment affects gingival margin stability in anterior areas.
- 2.Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Thoma DS, Muhlemann S, Jung RE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):106–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12045.
- 7.• Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg: Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(9 Suppl 2):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.158. Review discussing the advantages and disadvantages of stock and cast custom abutments as well as the benefits of using CAD/CAM custom abutments.
- 10.Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J. Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2000;21(10):793–7, 800–1; quiz 2.Google Scholar
- 11.Osorio J, Kerstein RB. Use of CAD/CAM technology in custom abutment manufacturing. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Dental Implant Abutments. 2014:65–101. doi:Book_Doi https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118928547.
- 12.Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Oden A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR. PROCERA: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1998;29(5):285–296.Google Scholar
- 17.Sakamoto S, Ro M, Al Ardah A, Goodacre C. Esthetic abutment design for angulated screw channels: a technical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.018.
- 19.Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010;23(4):299–309.Google Scholar
- 24.Linkevicius T, Apse P. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2008;23(3):449–56.Google Scholar
- 25.Martinez-Rus F, Prieto M, Salido MP, Madrigal C, Ozcan M, Pradies G. A clinical study assessing the influence of anodized titanium and zirconium dioxide abutments and peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):156–63. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Peng M, Zhao WJ, Hosseini M, Zhou WJ, Xiao T, Chuan JL. Influence of restorative materials on color of implant-supported single crowns in esthetic zone: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:5034358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5034358, 1, 7.
- 28.Wittneben JG, Gavric J, Belser UC, Bornstein MM, Joda T, Chappuis V, et al. Esthetic and clinical performance of implant-supported all-ceramic crowns made with prefabricated or CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2017;96(2):163–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516681767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Klotz MW, Taylor TD, Goldberg AJ. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2011;26(5):970–5.Google Scholar
- 31.Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hammerle CHF, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:4–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hammerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(3):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.• Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(8):802–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x. Investigation of 5-year survival rates and technical and biological complication rates of CAD/CAM custom zirconia and titanium abutments.
- 38.Barwacz CA, Brogden KA, Stanford CM, Dawson DV, Recker EN, Blanchette D. Comparison of pro-inflammatory cytokines and bone metabolism mediators around titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments following a minimum of 6 months of clinical function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):e35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar