Advertisement

Current Oral Health Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 121–126 | Cite as

CAD/CAM Custom Abutments for Esthetic Anterior Implant-Supported Restoration: Materials and Design

  • Ingeborg J. De KokEmail author
  • Lauren H. Katz
  • Ibrahim S. Duqum
Digital and Esthetic Dentistry (E Anadioti and P Stathopoulou, Section Editors)
  • 67 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Digital and Esthetic Dentistry

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to discuss the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom abutments in the anterior region with a focus on abutment design and material selection. Advantages, disadvantages, and complications of CAD/CAM abutments are also considered.

Recent Findings

CAD/CAM abutments are available in various materials and with different connection platforms to the implant in order to meet esthetic, functional, and biological demands. Use of CAD/CAM concepts in the fabrication of custom abutments allows for definite advantages over both stock abutments and conventional cast custom abutments.

Summary

CAD/CAM technology should be considered when restoring dental implants in the esthetic zone.

Keywords

CAD/CAM abutments Anterior implants Zirconia abutment Titanium abutment Esthetics 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consents

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    • Lops D, Bressan E, Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Cecchinato D, Romeo E. Soft tissues stability of CAD/CAM and stock abutments in anterior regions: 2-year prospective multicentric cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(12):1436–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12479. Study investigating if the type of abutment affects gingival margin stability in anterior areas.
  2. 2.
    Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–51.  https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thoma DS, Muhlemann S, Jung RE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):106–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12045.
  4. 4.
    Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennstrom J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paek J, Woo YH, Kim HS, Pae A, Noh K, Lee H, et al. Comparative analysis of screw loosening with prefabricated abutments and customized CAD/CAM abutments. Implant Dent. 2016;25(6):770–4.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD/CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117(6):715–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg: Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(9 Suppl 2):22–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.158. Review discussing the advantages and disadvantages of stock and cast custom abutments as well as the benefits of using CAD/CAM custom abutments.
  8. 8.
    Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nishimura RD, Chang TL, Perri GR, Beumer J 3rd. Restoration of partially edentulous patients using customized implant abutments. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999;11(6):669–76. quiz 78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J. Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2000;21(10):793–7, 800–1; quiz 2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osorio J, Kerstein RB. Use of CAD/CAM technology in custom abutment manufacturing. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Dental Implant Abutments. 2014:65–101. doi:Book_Doi  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118928547.
  12. 12.
    Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Oden A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR. PROCERA: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1998;29(5):285–296.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drago CJ, Peterson T. Treatment of an edentulous patient with CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthodon: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists. 2007;16(3):200–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00172.x. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(Suppl):110–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapos T, Evans C. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):117–36.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi2014supplg2.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerstein RB, Osorio J. Utilizing computer-generated duplicate titanium custom abutments to facilitate intraoral and laboratory implant prosthesis fabrication. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003;15(4):311–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakamoto S, Ro M, Al Ardah A, Goodacre C. Esthetic abutment design for angulated screw channels: a technical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.018.
  18. 18.
    Drago CJ. Two new clinical/laboratory protocols for CAD/CAM implant restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(6):794–800.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010;23(4):299–309.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cosgarea R, Gasparik C, Dudea D, Culic B, Dannewitz B, Sculean A. Peri-implant soft tissue colour around titanium and zirconia abutments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(5):537–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Medeiros RA, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JV, dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. Analysis of the peri-implant soft tissues in contact with zirconia abutments: an evidence-based literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(3):567–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guilherme NM, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Zheng C, Raigrodski AJ. Assessment of reliability of CAD/CAM tooth-colored implant custom abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):206–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim A, Campbell SD, Viana MA, Knoernschild KL. Abutment material effect on peri-implant soft tissue color and perceived esthetics. J Prosthodon: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists. 2016;25(8):634–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Linkevicius T, Apse P. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2008;23(3):449–56.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinez-Rus F, Prieto M, Salido MP, Madrigal C, Ozcan M, Pradies G. A clinical study assessing the influence of anodized titanium and zirconium dioxide abutments and peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):156–63.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peng M, Zhao WJ, Hosseini M, Zhou WJ, Xiao T, Chuan JL. Influence of restorative materials on color of implant-supported single crowns in esthetic zone: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:5034358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5034358, 1, 7.
  27. 27.
    Schnider N, Forrer FA, Bragger U, Hicklin SP. Clinical performance of one-piece, screw-retained implant crowns based on hand-veneered CAD/CAM zirconia abutments after a mean follow-up period of 2.3 years. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2018;33(1):188–96.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5929.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wittneben JG, Gavric J, Belser UC, Bornstein MM, Joda T, Chappuis V, et al. Esthetic and clinical performance of implant-supported all-ceramic crowns made with prefabricated or CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2017;96(2):163–70.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516681767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klotz MW, Taylor TD, Goldberg AJ. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2011;26(5):970–5.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1215–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hammerle CHF, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:4–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hammerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(3):219–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(8):802–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x. Investigation of 5-year survival rates and technical and biological complication rates of CAD/CAM custom zirconia and titanium abutments.
  34. 34.
    Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P. Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(3):159–76.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Conejo J, Kobayashi T, Anadioti E, Blatz MB. Performance of CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic implant-supported restorations bonded to titanium inserts: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:139–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yamane K, Ayukawa Y, Takeshita T, Furuhashi A, Yamashita Y, Koyano K. Bacterial adhesion affinities of various implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(12):1310–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02574.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nascimento C, Pita MS, Fernandes FH, Pedrazzi V, de Albuquerque Junior RF, Ribeiro RF. Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(3):337–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barwacz CA, Brogden KA, Stanford CM, Dawson DV, Recker EN, Blanchette D. Comparison of pro-inflammatory cytokines and bone metabolism mediators around titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments following a minimum of 6 months of clinical function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):e35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    van Brakel R, Meijer GJ, Verhoeven JW, Jansen J, de Putter C, Cune MS. Soft tissue response to zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo within-subject comparison. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(10):995–1001.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01931.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(4):575–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yuzugullu B, Avci M. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10(2):113–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00071.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Canullo L. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(5):489–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ekfeldt A, Furst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(11):1308–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02114.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingeborg J. De Kok
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lauren H. Katz
    • 1
  • Ibrahim S. Duqum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Prosthodontics, School of DentistryUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations