Advertisement

How Spirituality May Mitigate Against Stress and Related Mental Disorders: a Review and Preliminary Neurobiological Evidence

  • Clayton H. McClintock
  • Patrick D. Worhunsky
  • Iris M. Balodis
  • Rajita Sinha
  • Lisa Miller
  • Marc N. PotenzaEmail author
Hot Topic
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article aims to review recent research on the relationship between spirituality and stress and how spirituality may protect against stress-related mental disorders. Preliminary data on neural mechanisms by which spirituality may influence stress processing are also presented.

Recent Findings

Recent neuroscientific research on stress implicates widespread corticostriatal-limbic neural circuitry that includes the salience and the default-mode networks. Acute and chronic stress represents a significant etiological factor for a range of mental disorders, and research suggests that specific brain mechanisms of acute stress in healthy states overlap with mechanisms of psychopathology. Recent studies also indicate that spirituality protects against stress and its adverse consequences. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are presented in a proof-of-concept manner that suggest potential brain mechanisms for how spirituality may influence stress processing. Brain regions identified have been implicated in stress responsiveness, emotional and cognitive processing, and self-referential processing.

Summary

Research indicates that spirituality represents an important resilience factor for stress and its sequelae. Furthermore, preliminary fMRI data suggest a role for how spirituality may operate to attenuate neural responses to stress responsivity, regulate emotion during exposure to stress, and prevent and reduce stress-related psychopathology.

Keywords

Spirituality Stress Psychopathology Neural mechanisms Default-mode network 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Lisa Miller reports research grant from BOT Trust during the conduct of the study. Clayton McClintock, Patrick Worhunsky, Iris Balodis, Rajita Sinha, and Marc Potenza declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

40473_2019_195_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Eliade M. The sacred and the profane; the nature of religion. New York: Harcourt; 1959.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emmons RA. The psychology of ultimate concerns: motivation and spirituality in personality. Guilford Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Otto R. The idea of the holy; an inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational. New York: Oxford University Press; 1958.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tillich P. Dynamics of faith. New York: Harper & Row; 1957.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burchfield SR. The stress response: a new perspective. Psychosom Med. 1979;41(8):12.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197912000-00008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McEwen BS. In pursuit of resilience: stress, epigenetics, and brain plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373(1):56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20–8.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(6):463–75.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71(3):543–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1685–7.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.14.1685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faravelli C, Lo Sauro C, Lelli L, Pietrini F, Lazzeretti L, Godini L, et al. The role of life events and HPA axis in anxiety disorders: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(35):5663–74.  https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v2.i1.13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwako LE, Koob GF. Neuroclinical framework for the role of stress in addiction. Chron Stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif). 2017;1.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2470547017698140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gallup G. Surveying the religious landscape: trends in US beliefs: Morehouse Publishing; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walsh R. Lifestyle and mental health. Am Psychol. 2011;66(7):579–92.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodge DR, Zidan T, Husain A. Validation of the Intrinsic Spirituality Scale (ISS) with Muslims. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(4):1264–72.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carroll MM. Spirituality and clinical social work: implications of past and current perspectives. Arete. 1997;22:25–34 Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/arete/oclc/613902817/.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: the research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;2012:278730.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zinnbauer B, Pargament K, Cole B, Rye M, Butter E, Belavich T. Spirituality and religion: unfuzzying the fuzzy. J Sci Study Relig. 1997;36:549–64.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1387689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pargament K, Sullivan M, Balzer W, Van Haitsma K, Raymark P. The many meanings of religiousness: a policy-capturing approach. J Pers. 1995;63(4):31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hodge DR. The Intrinsic spirituality scale. J Soc Serv Res. 2003;30(1):41–61.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v30n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kass JD, Friedman R, Leserman J, Zuttermeister PC, Benson H. Health outcomes and a new index of spiritual experience. J Sci Study Relig. 1991:203–11.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1387214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saucier G, Skrzypińska K. Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions. J Pers. 2006;74(5):36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benson PL, Scales PC, Syvertsen AK, Roehlkepartain EC. Is youth spiritual development a universal developmental process? An international exploration. J Posit Psychol. 2012;7(6):453–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.732102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilber K. Integral spirituality : a startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. 1st ed. Boston: Integral Books; 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Emmons RA. Is spirituality an intelligence? Motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern. Int J Psychol Relig. 2000;10(1):3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1001_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McClintock CH, Lau E, Miller L. Phenotypic dimensions of spirituality: implications for mental health in China, India, and the United States. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1600.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293–319.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kretz O, Reichardt HM, Schütz G, Bock R. Corticotropin-releasing hormone expression is the major target for glucocorticoid feedback-control at the hypothalamic level. Brain Res. 1999;818(2):488–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01277-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):171–9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801153380307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McEwen BS, Bowles NP, Gray JD, Hill MN, Hunter RG, Karatsoreos IN, et al. Mechanisms of stress in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(10):1353–63.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sinha R. Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1141(1):105–30.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1441.030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dolcos F. The fast and the slow sides of cortisol’s effects on emotional interference and sustained attention. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:268.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hermans EJ, Henckens MJ, Joëls M, Fernández G. Dynamic adaptation of large-scale brain networks in response to acute stressors. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(6):304–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.03.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seo D, Ahluwalia A, Potenza MN, Sinha R. Gender differences in neural correlates of stress-induced anxiety. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1-2):115–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seo D, Tsou KA, Ansell EB, Potenza MN, Sinha R. Cumulative adversity sensitizes neural response to acute stress: association with health symptoms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(3):670–80.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dedovic K, Duchesne A, Engert V, Lue SD, Andrews J, Efanov SI, et al. Psychological, endocrine and neural responses to social evaluation in subclinical depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(10):1632–44.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sinha R, Lacadie C, Skudlarski P, Wexler BE. Neural circuits underlying emotional distress in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1032(1):254–7.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    • Seo D, Rabinowitz AG, Douglas RJ, Sinha R. Limbic response to stress linking life trauma and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;99:38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.08.023. This script-driven imagery study replicated the finding that acute stress involves widespread corticostrial-limbic neural circuitry. Findings also revealed an impact of lifetime trauma on HPA axis activity and neural responses. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lucassen PJ, Pruessner J, Sousa N, Almeida OF, Van Dam AM, Rajkowska G, et al. Neuropathology of stress. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(1):109–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1223-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Blix E, Perski A, Berglund H, Savic I. Long-term occupational stress is associated with regional reductions in brain tissue volumes. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64065.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang L, Dai Z, Peng H, Tan L, Ding Y, He Z, et al. Overlapping and segregated resting-state functional connectivity in patients with major depressive disorder with and without childhood neglect. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(4):1154–66.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Magalhaes R, Barriere DA, Novais A, Marques F, Marques P, Cerqueira J, et al. The dynamics of stress: a longitudinal MRI study of rat brain structure and connectome. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(10):1998–2006.  https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sinha R, Lacadie CM, Constable RT, Seo D. Dynamic neural activity during stress signals resilient coping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(31):8837–42.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600965113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Arnsten AF, Raskind MA, Taylor FB, Connor DF. The effects of stress exposure on prefrontal cortex: translating basic research into successful treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1:89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    •• Van Oort J, Tendolkar I, Hermans E, Mulders P, Beckmann C, Schene A, et al. How the brain connects in response to acute stress: a review at the human brain systems level. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;83:281–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.015. A comprehensive review of research on functional brain networks related to acute stress. The salience network and default mode network were consistently associated with the acute stress response. Included is a discussion on the variety of stress research paradigms and their implications. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goulden N, Khusnulina A, Davis NJ, Bracewell RM, Bokde AL, McNulty JP, et al. The salience network is responsible for switching between the default mode network and the central executive network: replication from DCM. Neuroimage. 2014;99:180–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.052.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    van Marle HJ, Hermans EJ, Qin S, Fernández G. From specificity to sensitivity: how acute stress affects amygdala processing of biologically salient stimuli. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(7):649–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oei NY, Both S, van Heemst D, van der Grond J. Acute stress-induced cortisol elevations mediate reward system activity during subconscious processing of sexual stimuli. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;39:111–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.10.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Andrews-Hanna JR, Smallwood J, Spreng RN. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1316(1):29–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Boehringer A, Tost H, Haddad L, Lederbogen F, Wüst S, Schwarz E, et al. Neural correlates of the cortisol awakening response in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(9):2278–85.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Muscatell KA, Dedovic K, Slavich GM, Jarcho MR, Breen EC, Bower JE, et al. Greater amygdala activity and dorsomedial prefrontal–amygdala coupling are associated with enhanced inflammatory responses to stress. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;43:46–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2014.06.201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vaisvaser S, Lin T, Admon R, Podlipsky I, Greenman Y, Stern N, et al. Neural traces of stress: cortisol related sustained enhancement of amygdala-hippocampal functional connectivity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:313.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00313.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vinkers CH, Joels M, Milaneschi Y, Kahn RS, Penninx BW, Boks MP. Stress exposure across the life span cumulatively increases depression risk and is moderated by neuroticism. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(9):737–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez MI. Delay of gratification in children. Science. 1989;244(4907):933–8.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vaisvaser S, Modai S, Farberov L, Lin T, Sharon H, Gilam A, et al. Neuro-epigenetic indications of acute stress response in humans: the case of microRNA-29c. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146236.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mulders PC, van Eijndhoven PF, Schene AH, Beckmann CF, Tendolkar I. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;56:330–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Balodis IM, Potenza MN. Anticipatory reward processing in addicted populations: a focus on the monetary incentive delay task. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(5):434–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Badura-Brack A, McDermott TJ, Heinrichs-Graham E, Ryan TJ, Khanna MM, Pine DS, et al. Veterans with PTSD demonstrate amygdala hyperactivity while viewing threatening faces: a MEG study. Biol Psychol. 2018;132:228–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. Stress-and allostasis-induced brain plasticity. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:431–45.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-052209-100430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Radley J, Morilak D, Viau V, Campeau S. Chronic stress and brain plasticity: mechanisms underlying adaptive and maladaptive changes and implications for stress-related CNS disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;58:79–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Southwick SM, Charney DS. The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression. Science. 2012;338(6103):79–82.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222942.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Reutter K, Bigatti S. Religiosity and spirituality as resiliency resources: moderation, mediation, or moderated mediation? J Sci Study Relig. 2014;53(1):17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yadav R, Khanna A, Singh D. Exploration of relationship between stress and spirituality characteristics of male and female engineering students: a comprehensive study. J Relig Health. 2017;56(2):388–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0174-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    • Hill TD, Ellison CG, Burdette AM, Taylor J, Friedman KL. Dimensions of religious involvement and leukocyte telomere length. Soc Sci Med. 2016;163:168–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.032. Cross-sectional study of 1252 adults which found that religious involvement was associated with greater telomere length, demonstrating a link between religiosity and healthy aging. This is the first population-based study on religiosity and/or spiritiuality and cellular aging. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Koenig HG, Nelson B, Shaw SF, Saxena S, Cohen HJ. Religious involvement and telomere length in women family caregivers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016;204(1):36–42.  https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lavretsky H, Epel ES, Siddarth P, Nazarian N, Cyr NS, Khalsa DS, et al. A pilot study of yogic meditation for family dementia caregivers with depressive symptoms: effects on mental health, cognition, and telomerase activity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(1):57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jacobs TL, Epel ES, Lin J, Blackburn EH, Wolkowitz OM, Bridwell DA, et al. Intensive meditation training, immune cell telomerase activity, and psychological mediators. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36(5):664–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tull ES, Doswell WM, Cort MA. Spirituality moderates the relationship of psychosocial stress to metabolic risk factors among Afro-Caribbean immigrants in the US Virgin Islands. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015;2(1):132–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-014-0056-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tang YY, Tang R, Posner MI. Mindfulness meditation improves emotion regulation and reduces drug abuse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163(Suppl 1):S13–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Greeson JM, Webber DM, Smoski MJ, Brantley JG, Ekblad AG, Suarez EC, et al. Changes in spirituality partly explain health-related quality of life outcomes after Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction. J Behav Med. 2011;34(6):508–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9332-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Greeson JM, Smoski MJ, Suarez EC, Brantley JG, Ekblad AG, Lynch TR, et al. Decreased symptoms of depression after mindfulness-based stress reduction: potential moderating effects of religiosity, spirituality, trait mindfulness, sex, and age. J Alternat Complement Med (New York, NY). 2015;21(3):166–74.  https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2014.0285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pascoe MC, Thompson DR, Jenkins ZM, Ski CF. Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;95:156–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Karatsoreos IN, McEwen BS. Psychobiological allostasis: resistance, resilience and vulnerability. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(12):576–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    • Miller L, Balodis IM, McClintock CH, Xu J, Lacadie CM, Sinha R, et al. Neural correlates of personalized spiritual experiences. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29(6):2331–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy102. This study utilized script-driven imagery to examine brain activity associated with spiritual experiences. The inferior parietal lobule and caudate were implicated. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Elsey J, Coates A, Lacadie CM, McCrory EJ, Sinha R, Mayes LC, et al. Childhood trauma and neural responses to personalized stress, favorite-food and neutral-relaxing cues in adolescents. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(7):1580–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Li C-sR, Sinha R. Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: neuroimaging evidence for frontal–limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(3):581–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Brewer JA, Garrison KA, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. What about the “self” is processed in the posterior cingulate cortex? Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:647.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00647.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Barnby JM, Bailey NW, Chambers R, Fitzgerald PB. How similar are the changes in neural activity resulting from mindfulness practice in contrast to spiritual practice? Conscious Cogn. 2015;36:219–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Svob C, Wang Z, Weissman MM, Wickramaratne P, Posner J. Religious and spiritual importance moderate relation between default mode network connectivity and familial risk for depression. Neurosci Lett. 2016;634:94–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    McClintock CH, Worhunsky PD, Xu J, Balodis IM, Sinha R, Miller L, et al. Spiritual experiences are related to sustained engagement of a ventral frontotemporal functional brain network. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Holzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T, Schuman-Olivier Z, Vago DR, Ott U. How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(6):537–59.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611419671.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Vago DR, Zeidan F. The brain on silent: mind wandering, mindful awareness, and states of mental tranquility. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373(1):96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Berkovich-Ohana A, Glicksohn J, Goldstein A. Studying the default mode and its mindfulness-induced changes using EEG functional connectivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(10):1616–24.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Garrison KA, Zeffiro TA, Scheinost D, Constable RT, Brewer JA. Meditation leads to reduced default mode network activity beyond an active task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015;15(3):712–20.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0358-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Panda R, Bharath RD, Upadhyay N, Mangalore S, Chennu S, Rao SL. Temporal dynamics of the default mode network characterize meditation-induced alterations in consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:372.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00372.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Taylor VA, Daneault V, Grant J, Scavone G, Breton E, Roffe-Vidal S, et al. Impact of meditation training on the default mode network during a restful state. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013;8(1):4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lutz J, Brühl AB, Doerig N, Scheerer H, Achermann R, Weibel A, et al. Altered processing of self-related emotional stimuli in mindfulness meditators. NeuroImage. 2016;124:958–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Walsh R, Shapiro SL. The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology: a mutually enriching dialogue. Am Psychol. 2006;61(3):227–39.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    James W. The varieties of religious experience; a study in human nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.; 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hood RW. The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. J Sci Study Relig. 1975:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1384454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kim K, Johnson MK. Extended self: spontaneous activation of medial prefrontal cortex by objects that are ‘mine’. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013;9(7):1006–12.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zeidan F, Vago DR. Mindfulness meditation–based pain relief: a mechanistic account. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373(1):114–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Zeidan F, Salomons T, Farris SR, Emerson NM, Adler-Neal A, Jung Y, et al. Neural mechanisms supporting the relationship between dispositional mindfulness and pain. Pain. 2018;159(12):2477–85.  https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(5):242–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ochsner KN, Silvers JA, Buhle JT. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1251:E1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Williams LE, Bargh JA, Nocera CC, Gray JR. The unconscious regulation of emotion: nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. Emotion. 2009;9(6):847–54.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017745.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Chambers R, Gullone E, Allen NB. Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(6):560–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gard T, Holzel BK, Sack AT, Hempel H, Lazar SW, Vaitl D, et al. Pain attenuation through mindfulness is associated with decreased cognitive control and increased sensory processing in the brain. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(11):2692–702.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Grant JA, Courtemanche J, Rainville P. A non-elaborative mental stance and decoupling of executive and pain-related cortices predicts low pain sensitivity in Zen meditators. Pain. 2011;152(1):150–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Deacon BJ, Fawzy TI, Lickel JJ, Wolitzky-Taylor KB. Cognitive defusion versus cognitive restructuring in the treatment of negative self-referential thoughts: an investigation of process and outcome. J Cogn Psychother. 2011;25(3):218–32.  https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.25.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Pargament KI, Smith BW, Koenig HG, Perez L. Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. J Sci Study Relig. 1998:710–24.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1388152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Barnhofer T, Huntenburg JM, Lifshitz M, Wild J, Antonova E, Margulies DS. How mindfulness training may help to reduce vulnerability for recurrent depression: a neuroscientific perspective. Clin Psychol Sci. 2016;4(2):328–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615595036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Coutinho JF, Fernandesl SV, Soares JM, Maia L, Gonçalves ÓF, Sampaio A. Default mode network dissociation in depressive and anxiety states. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016;10(1):147–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9375-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R. Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insula regions. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(1):57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.11.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Savitz J, Rauch SL, Drevets W. Clinical application of brain imaging for the diagnosis of mood disorders: the current state of play. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(5):528–39.  https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clayton H. McClintock
    • 1
  • Patrick D. Worhunsky
    • 2
  • Iris M. Balodis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rajita Sinha
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • Lisa Miller
    • 1
  • Marc N. Potenza
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Spirituality Mind Body Institute, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, DeGroote School of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Child Study CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Department of NeuroscienceYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  6. 6.Connecticut Mental Health CenterNew HavenUSA
  7. 7.Connecticut Council on Problem GamblingWethersfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations