Ethical Implications in Donor and Recipient Utilization for Liver Transplant
- 8 Downloads
Purpose of Review
The inception of liver transplantation although controversial continues to save daily lives of patients in need. Its successful practice is owed to the various medical advancements to cross the complex immunological and surgical barriers. Herein, we discuss the several ethical dilemmas in organ donation and transplantation with application of ethical principles and reflections from the literature
There are several ethical and moral complexities when evaluating living donors and matching deceased donor livers to recipients. The lack of “one size fits all” turns these complexities into controversies and thus requires a well-balanced ethical approach for better acceptance.
Since the practice of transplant is dependent on the moral behaviors of society, i.e., act of organ donation, it confers many ethical issues that the transplant community has to carefully address. These issues are doubly onerous because every act of transplant has two parties involved: the donor and the recipient. Therefore, transplant physicians have to uphold the ethics of physician-patient relationship for the recipient, fair allocation of donor organs, and demonstrate good organ stewardship for the donated gift of the community, i.e., the organ. Thus, practice of organ transplantation is a unique blend of utilitarian and egalitarian principles while also being equitable and in line with the moral code of the Hippocratic Oath.
KeywordsLiver transplant Organ donation Bioethics Organ allocation Autonomy Physician paternalism MELD
I would like to thank Dr. David Mulligan (2019 President Elect, United Network for Organ Sharing; Professor and Chief, Yale New Haven Transplant Center), for his support, including review of this chapter.
This work was supported in part by Health Resources and Services Administration contract 234-2005-37011C.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Beauchamp T CJ. The principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford; 2001.Google Scholar
- 2.Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 64 FR 56659, Oct. 20, 1999, as amended at 64 FR 71626, Dec. 21, 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.The Consensus Statement of the Amsterdam Forum on the Care of the Live Kidney Donor. Transplantation. 2004;78(4):491-2.Google Scholar
- 8.Aalamian Z, Abbey S, Acott P, et al. Enhancing living donation: a Canadian Forum Report and Recommendations [Internet]. Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation: Edmonton, AB; 2006. Available at: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/hc-sc/H14-15-2006E.pdf Google Scholar
- 10.Lopp L. Final report: a common frame of reference for European laws on living organ donation. Work Package 3: Legal Restrictions and Safeguards for Living Donation in Europe/Part1: Comparative analysis of European transplant laws regarding living organ donation: an overview EULOD (Living Organ Donation in Europe); 2012. Available at: http://www.eulod.org/Files/Eulod/Content_Files/p2vCMDeliverable.No7.WWUM.Short.Version.pdf.
- 11.Human Tissue Act [United Kingdom] [Internet]. London, UK: Government of the United Kingdom; 2004. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/section/2.Google Scholar
- 12.Human Tissue (Scotland) Act, Part 1, Sect. 17 and Part 7, Sect. 60.(1) [Internet]. Edinburgh, UK: Government of Scotland; 2006. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2006/4/pdfs/asp_20060004_en.pdf.Google Scholar
- 23.Lué A, Solanas E, Baptista P, Lorente S, Araiz JJ, Garcia-Gil A, et al. How important is donor age in liver transplantation? 2016;22(21):4966.Google Scholar
- 30.• Cucchetti A, Ross LF, Thistlethwaite JR, Vitale A, Ravaioli M, Cescon M, et al. Age and equity in liver transplantation: an organ allocation model. Liver Transpl. 2015;21(10):1241–9 The authors provide a unique perspective to the organ allocation policies for liver reflecting equity and efficiency based on utility. On this paradigm, an age mapping algorithm is proposed for liver allocation to increase lifespan of an organ. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Engel M. Va. Doctor plans company to arrange sale of human kidneys. The Washington Post; September 1983. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/09/19/va-doctor-plans-company-to-arrange-sale-of-human-kidneys/afdfac69-62ed-4066-b296-fcf892eab758/.
- 35.Sullivan W. Buying of kidneys of poor attached. The New York Times; September 1983. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/24/us/buying-of-kidneys-of-poor-attacked.html.
- 36.National Organ Transplantation Act of 1984, Pub L. 98-507, 98 Stat. 2339-2348 (Oct. 19, 1984).Google Scholar
- 37.United States Congress. 2007. Charlie W. Norwood Living Organ Donation Act, Pub. L. No. 110–144, 121 Stat 1814 (2007) [On-line]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ144/PLAW-110publ144.pdf (accessed August 28, 2019).Google Scholar
- 39.• Tong A, Ralph AF, Chapman JR, Wong G, Gill JS, Josephson MA, et al. Focus group study of public opinion about paying living kidney donors in Australia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(7):1217–26 This is the first study of its kind to demonstrate and analyze the public opinion about financial incentivization of organ donors. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Perry P. What you need to know about human organ trafficking. (25th April 2016). Available at https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/what-you-need-to-know-about-human-organ-trafficking.
- 43.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking (UN.GIFT) Available at : https://www.unodc.org/pdf/gift%20brochure.pdf.Google Scholar
- 48.• Batra R. The moral hypocrisy of a transplant surgeon. American College of Surgeons. Available at https://www.facs.org/member-services/yfa/advocacy-essays/rbatra This is an excellent essay that portrays the conflicts of transplant physicians, as they uphold the moral obligation of physician patient relationship while also reflecting civic duties of good organ stewardship. Google Scholar