Advertisement

Current Transplantation Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 319–326 | Cite as

Liver Transplantation for HCC Beyond Milan

  • Paolo Magistri
  • Russell Rosenblatt
  • Karim J. HalazunEmail author
Liver Transplantation (D Mulligan, Section Editor)
  • 16 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Liver Transplantation

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

To describe how the field of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has expanded beyond the Milan criteria.

Recent Findings

The Milan criteria have been the gold standard selection tool for patients with HCC undergoing LT since 1996. However, soon after its creation, the tumor size and number limits imposed by the Milan criteria were expanded upon by new models, such as the University of California-San Francisco criteria and the Metroticket. Still, these models were always limited by radiological inaccuracy in measuring tumor size and number and, more importantly, did not include any measurement of tumor behavior. Biomarkers, such as alpha-fetoprotein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, provide that missing link and act as effective predictors of biological behavior and, therefore, provide an ability to predict tumor recurrence in patients undergoing LT for HCC, allowing for successful expansion beyond Milan.

Summary

More recently, newer scoring systems combine morphometric tumor data with markers of biology. These scoring systems, such as the MORAL score, AFP model, RETREAT score, and Metroticket 2.0, are providing the most accurate pre-LT assessments for HCC recurrence and hold the key to the continued improvement of LT outcomes.

Keywords

Extended criteria Liver transplantation Liver cancer Hepatocellular carcinoma Biomarkers 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Iwatsuki S, Gordon RD, Shaw BW Jr, Starzl TE. Role of liver transplantation in cancer therapy. Ann Surg. 1985;202(4):401–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):693–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNOS/OPTN policy 3.6.4.4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ha J, Yan M, Aguilar M, Tana MM, Liu B, Frenette CT, et al. Race/ethnicity-specific disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma stage at diagnosis and its impact on receipt of curative therapies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50(5):423–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sotiropoulos GC, Malag M, Molmenti E, Paul A, Nadalin S, Brokalaki E, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: is clinical tumor classification before transplantation realistic? Transplantation. 2005;79(4):483–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah SA, JCC T, ID MG, Cattral MS, Cleary SP, Levy GA, et al. Accuracy of staging as a predictor for recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 2006;81(12):1633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwartz ME, D’Amico F, Vitale A, Emre S, Cillo U. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: are the Milan criteria still valid? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:256–62.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young RS, Aldiwani M, Hakeem AR, Nair A, Guthrie A, Wyatt J, et al. Pre-liver transplant biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a potential criterion for exclusion from transplantation? HPB. 2013;15(6):418–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001;33(6):1394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Mariani L, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Samoylova ML, Dodge JL, Yao FY, Roberts JP. Time to transplantation as a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2014;20(8):937–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halazun KJ, Patzer RE, Rana AA, Verna EC, Griesemer AD, Parsons RF, et al. Standing the test of time: outcomes of a decade of prioritizing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, results of the UNOS natural geographic experiment. Hepatology. 2014;60(6):1957–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    •• Halazun KJ, Najjar M, Abdelmessih RM, Samstein B, Griesemer AD, Guarrera JV, et al. Recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):557–64 The MORAL score—a combination of pre- and post-LT criteria consisting of NLR, maximum AFP > 200, and largest tumor size along with pathologic and morphometric data—accurately predicted HCC recurrence post-LT. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Zhou J, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Fan J, et al. Metroticket 2.0 model for analysis of competing risks of death after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yao FY, Xiao L, Bass NM, Kerlan R, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(11):2587–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mazzaferro V. Results of liver transplantation: with or without Milan criteria? Liver Transplant. 2007;13(11 SUPPL. 2).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bittermann T, Niu B, Hoteit MA, Goldberg D. Waitlist priority for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria: a potentially appropriate decision without a structured approach. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(1):79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D’Amico F, Schwartz M, Vitale A, Tabrizian P, Roayaie S, Thung S, et al. Predicting recurrence after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the up-to-seven criteria. Liver Transplant. 2009;15(10):1278–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lei JY, Wang WT, Yan LN. “Metroticket” predictor for assessing liver transplantation to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center analysis in mainland China. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(44):8093–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abelev GI. Alpha-fetoprotein in ontogenesis and its association with malignant tumors. Adv Cancer Res. 1971;14(C):295–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherman M. Alphafetoprotein: an obituary. J Hepatol. 2001;34(4):603–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherman M. The resurrection of alphafetoprotein. J Hepatol. 2010;52(6):939–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berry K, Ioannou GN. Serum alpha-fetoprotein level independently predicts posttransplant survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transplant. 2013;19(6):634–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sapisochin G, Goldaracena N, Laurence JM, Dib M, Barbas A, Ghanekar A, et al. The extended Toronto criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective validation study. Hepatology. 2016;64(6).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grąt M, Kornasiewicz O, Lewandowski Z, Hołówko W, Grąt K, Kobryń K, et al. Combination of morphologic criteria and α-fetoprotein in selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation minimizes the problem of posttransplant tumor recurrence. World J Surg. 2015;38(10):2698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vibert E, Azoulay D, Hoti E, Iacopinelli S, Samuel D, Salloum C, et al. Progression of alphafetoprotein before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a critical factor. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(1):129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dumitra TC, Dumitra S, Metrakos PP, Barkun JS, Chaudhury P, Deschênes M, et al. Pretransplantation α-fetoprotein slope and Milan criteria: strong predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):228–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Merani S, Majno P, Kneteman NM, Berney T, Morel P, Mentha G, et al. The impact of waiting list alpha-fetoprotein changes on the outcome of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2011;55(4):814–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Song PP, Xia JF, Inagaki Y, Hasegawa K, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, et al. Controversies regarding and perspectives on clinical utility of biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:262–74.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Richardson P, Duan Z, Kramer J, Davila JA, Tyson GL, El-Serag HB. Determinants of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in hepatitis C-infected patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(4):428–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocaña A, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 106, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2014.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Halazun KJ, Hardy MA, Rana AA, Woodland DC, Luyten EJ, Mahadev S, et al. Negative impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009;250(1):141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Motomura T, Shirabe K, Mano Y, Muto J, Toshima T, Umemoto Y, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio reflects hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation via inflammatory microenvironment. J Hepatol. 2013;58(1):58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoshizumi T, Ikegami T, Yoshiya S, Motomura T, Mano Y, Muto J, et al. Impact of tumor size, number of tumors and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(7):709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357:539–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xia W, Ke Q, Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang M, Shen Y, et al. Predictive value of pre-transplant platelet to lymphocyte ratio for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13(1):60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xia W, Ke Q, Guo H, Wang W, Zhang M, Shen Y, et al. Expansion of the Milan criteria without any sacrifice: combination of the Hangzhou criteria with the pre-transplant platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zheng S-S, Xu X, Wu J, Chen J, Wang W-L, Zhang M, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiences. Transplantation. 2008;85(12):1726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Castell JV, Gómez-lechón MJ, David M, Fabra R, Trullenque R, Heinrich PC. Acute-phase response of human hepatocytes: regulation of acute-phase protein synthesis by interleukin-6. Hepatology. 1990;12(5):1179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zheng Z, Zhou L, Gao S, Yang Z, Yao J, Zheng S. Prognostic role of C-reactive protein in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(6):653–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    An HJ, Jang JW, Bae SH, Choi JY, Yoon SK, Lee MA, et al. Serum C-reactive protein is a useful biomarker for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transplant. 2012;18(12):1406–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liebman HA, Furie BC, Tong MJ, Blanchard RA, Lo K-J, Lee S-D, et al. Des-γ-Carboxy (abnormal) prothrombin as a serum marker of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(22):1427–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marrero JA, Su GL, Wei W, Emick D, Conjeevaram HS, Fontana RJ, et al. Des-gamma carboxyprothrombin can differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from nonmalignant chronic liver disease in American patients. Hepatology. 2003;37(5):1114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fujiki M, Takada Y, Ogura Y, Oike F, Kaido T, Teramukai S, et al. Significance of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in selection criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(10):2362–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Poté N, Cauchy F, Albuquerque M, Voitot H, Belghiti J, Castera L, et al. Performance of PIVKA-II for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and prediction of microvascular invasion. J Hepatol. 2015;62(4):848–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shirabe K, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, Taketomi A, Aishima SI, et al. The predictors of microvascular invasion in candidates for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma - with special reference to the serum levels of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95(3):235–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sakaguchi T, Suzuki S, Morita Y, Oishi K, Suzuki A, Fukumoto K, et al. Impact of the preoperative des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level on prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. Surg Today. 2010;40(7):638–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pommergaard H-C, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J, Rasmussen A. Serologic and molecular biomarkers for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev. 2016;30(3):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Duvoux C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Decaens T, Pessione F, Badran H, Piardi T, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of milan criteria. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(4).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Notarpaolo A, Layese R, Magistri P, Gambato M, Colledan M, Magini G, et al. Validation of the AFP model as a predictor of HCC recurrence in patients with viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis who had received a liver transplant for HCC. J Hepatol. 2017;66(3):552–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Piñero F, Tisi Baña M, de Ataide EC, Hoyos Duque S, Marciano S, Varón A, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of the alpha-fetoprotein model in a multicenter cohort from Latin America. Liver Int. 2016;36(11):1657–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    • Mehta N, Heimbach J, Harnois DM, Sapisochin G, Dodge JL, Lee D, et al. Validation of a Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplant. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):193–500 The RETREAT score combined AFP level, microvascular invasion, sum of the largest viable tumor diameter, and nuber to accurately predict recurrence post-LT, stratifying patients from low-risk (3%) to high-risk (75%). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mehta N, Dodge JL, Roberts JP, Yao FY. Validation of the prognostic power of the RETREAT score for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence using the UNOS database. Am J Transplant. 2017.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    • Sasaki K, Firl DJ, Hashimoto K, Fujiki M, Diago-Uso T, Quintini C, et al. Development and validation of the HALT-HCC score to predict mortality in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(8):595–603 The HALT-HCC score combined MELD-Na, tumor burden score, and ln AFP to accurately predict HCC recurrence after LT. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nasralla D, Coussios CC, Mergental H, Akhtar MZ, Butler AJ, Ceresa CDL, et al. A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation. Nature. 2018;557(7703):50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Magistri
    • 1
  • Russell Rosenblatt
    • 2
  • Karim J. Halazun
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation UnitUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyWeill Cornell Medicine CollegeNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of SurgeryWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations