Transplantation for the Very Sick Patient—Donor and Recipient Factors
- 12 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Patients with end-stage chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently deteriorate with development of a ‘frail’ state and progress to development of extra-hepatic organ failures. Making the clinical judgement when a patient is ‘too sick’ to proceed with liver transplantation is challenging; we summarise recent studies that may inform decision-making.
Reports quantify the impact of both recipient and donor factors related to early post-transplant survival, with consistent adverse association of advanced donor and recipient age, under-nutrition, sarcopenia and impaired functional status, and requirement for critical care unit admission and organ support. Survival for ‘very sick’ recipients has shown progressive improvement over time, but evidence is increasing of much greater post-transplant resource use and cost.
Factors associated with adverse outcomes in very sick recipients are becoming more clearly delineated. The increasing success of transplantation and exploration of its extended use must be tempered by the recognition of the consequences upon constrained clinical resources.
KeywordsFrailty Performance status Sarcopenia ACLF Outcome prediction
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
- 1.•• Asrani SK, Saracino G, O'Leary JG, et al. Recipient characteristics and morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2018;15:15. Large national study identifying key recipient factors predictive of post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Google Scholar
- 2.•• Bittermann T, Makar G, Goldberg DS. Early post-transplant survival: interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status. J Hepatol. 2015;63(3):601–8. Analysis of UNOS dataset confirming and quantifying impact of hospitalisation on post-transplant outcome. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Aloia TA, Knight R, Gaber AO, Ghobrial RM, Goss JA. Analysis of liver transplant outcomes for United Network for Organ Sharing recipients 60 years old or older identifies multiple model for end-stage liver disease-independent prognostic factors. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(8):950–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.•• Lai JC, Dodge JL, Sen S, Covinsky K, Feng S. Functional decline in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: results from the functional assessment in liver transplantation (FrAILT) study. Hepatology. 2016;63(2):574–80. Prospective study documenting functional deterioration of patients on transplant waitlist and association with increased risk of death, independent of MELD score CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Serper M, Bittermann T, Rossi M, et al. Functional status, healthcare utilization, and the costs of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2017;08:08.Google Scholar
- 21.•• Dolgin NH, Martins PN, Movahedi B, Lapane KL, Anderson FA, Bozorgzadeh A. Functional status predicts postoperative mortality after liver transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2016;30(11):1403–10. Large national study assessing impact of pre-transplant functional status on predictive of post-transplant mortality CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.van Vugt JL, Levolger S, de Bruin RW, van Rosmalen J, Metselaar HJ, JN IJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle mass on outcome in patients awaiting or undergoing liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(8):2277–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Huebener P, Sterneck MR, Bangert K, et al. Stabilisation of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients before liver transplantation predicts post-transplant survival. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;02:02.Google Scholar